Re: Need a statement on Fedora's purpose

2019-04-04 Thread Thomas Dineen
That's it! that's the ticket! Proposed statement on Fedora's purpose: "To cause servers to use more power!" Without this the entire economy collapses! Thomas Dineen On 4/4/2019 1:38 PM, John Harris wrote: On Thursday, April 4, 2019 4:37:01 PM EDT Thomas Dineen wrote: GentlePeople: I t

Re: Need a statement on Fedora's purpose

2019-04-04 Thread John Harris
On Thursday, April 4, 2019 4:37:01 PM EDT Thomas Dineen wrote: > GentlePeople: > > I that you haven't observed this by now! > > Proposed statement on Fedora's purpose: > > "Fedora has no purpose it only exists!" > > Thomas Dineen > > I seem to recall some comical "purpose" for Fedora, wr

Re: Need a statement on Fedora's purpose

2019-04-04 Thread Thomas Dineen
GentlePeople:    I that you haven't observed this by now! Proposed statement on Fedora's purpose: "Fedora has no purpose it only exists!" Thomas Dineen On 4/4/2019 1:19 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 4/5/19 2:09 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 08:39:16AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote

Re: sane : how to remove old scanners ?

2019-04-04 Thread Louis Lagendijk
On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 11:17 -0400, sean darcy wrote: > On fedora 29 , sane-backends 1.0.27. > > scanimage -L shows a number of scanners that are no longer > connected, > and haven't been used in years. > > In what file is this info stored ? Couldn't find any reference under > /etc/sane.d. > >

Re: Need a statement on Fedora's purpose

2019-04-04 Thread Ed Greshko
On 4/5/19 2:09 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 08:39:16AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> An extreme case of this would be F29 going from the 4.X kernel to the 5.X >> kernel. > Note that this isn't *really* an extreme case — there's no bigger difference > in that increase than from

Re: docker-io removed from epel RHEL6

2019-04-04 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 4/4/19 2:59 PM, Brando Mota wrote: > hi! > I can not install the docker-io package in RHEL 6.10 x86_64 because this > package is removed from repo epel. > how to find this package in epel again? > thanks. > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedo

docker-io removed from epel RHEL6

2019-04-04 Thread Brando Mota
hi! I can not install the docker-io package in RHEL 6.10 x86_64 because this package is removed from repo epel. how to find this package in epel again? thanks. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-

Re: how to check for disk fragmentation? [SOLVED]

2019-04-04 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 4/3/19 8:12 PM, home user via users wrote: The results above do raise a question in my mind:  What are those "[user's home]/.local/share/tracker/tracker-miner-fs.log" files?  Anything to do with coin or data mining, or something else malicious? Tracker is a service that indexes your files s

Re: Need a statement on Fedora's purpose

2019-04-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 06:30:21PM -0400, Digimer wrote: > I've had so many bug reports to Fedora go ignored, only to have them > auto-close when the version I filed against goes EOL. I rarely even > bother filing bugs against it anymore. Yeah, this is frustrating, but there's just plain more bugs

Re: Need a statement on Fedora's purpose

2019-04-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 08:51:32PM -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 3/31/19 4:51 PM, David Dusanic wrote: > >Fedora is bleeding edge > Not really. It is the next thing that is stable after the > bleeding edge. Think LibreOffice and Firefox and the kernel. Yeah, thank you Todd and Margo.

Re: Need a statement on Fedora's purpose

2019-04-04 Thread John Harris
On Thursday, April 4, 2019 2:09:37 PM EDT Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 08:39:16AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > An extreme case of this would be F29 going from the 4.X kernel to the 5.X > > kernel. > > Note that this isn't *really* an extreme case — there's no bigger > differe

Re: sane : how to remove old scanners ?

2019-04-04 Thread Ted Roche
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:17 AM sean darcy wrote: > On fedora 29 , sane-backends 1.0.27. > > scanimage -L shows a number of scanners that are no longer connected, > and haven't been used in years. > > In what file is this info stored ? Couldn't find any reference under > /etc/sane.d. > > Is there

Re: Need a statement on Fedora's purpose

2019-04-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 08:39:16AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > An extreme case of this would be F29 going from the 4.X kernel to the 5.X > kernel. Note that this isn't *really* an extreme case — there's no bigger difference in that increase than from 4.19 to 4.20. Linus Torvalds just doesn't like

Re: Need a statement on Fedora's purpose

2019-04-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 03:20:10PM -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >I just had a vendor tell me they do not support Fedora Server > because the the developers of Fedora had stated that it is not > a stable release and is used only as a testing ground for Red > Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL).

Re: F30 and php 7.3

2019-04-04 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 16:06 +, sixpack13 wrote: > upgrade and running F30 without any trouble. F30 has not been released, so any discussion should go to the Fedora Test list. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscri

Re: sane : how to remove old scanners ?

2019-04-04 Thread Tom Horsley
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 12:51:05 -0400 sean darcy wrote: > Any other suggestions ? You could run the command under strace -e trace=%file to see what files it opens (which doesn't help if it is talking to the gconf server or something like that). ___ users ma

Re: how to check for disk fragmentation?

2019-04-04 Thread David Dusanic
home user via users: Good evening, I recall that a few years ago, I somehow checked my Fedora system for disk fragmentation. I also think the tool came with Fedora; i did not have to install it separately. Now, I don't recall the name of the tool that did that. Nor can I find any tool to d

Re: how to check for disk fragmentation? [SOLVED]

2019-04-04 Thread Ed Greshko
On 4/4/19 11:53 PM, home user via users wrote: > (Ed wrote) > > These are produced by the "tracker" packages. > > I, personally, couldn't find a need for them so I erased them > > quite some time ago. > > I assume you deleted the files, not the packages.  Mine were dated 2013, so I > deleted them.

Re: sane : how to remove old scanners ?

2019-04-04 Thread sean darcy
On 4/4/19 11:39 AM, sixpack13 wrote: I'm no expert, but I guess config's to/ for (?) old scanners are also stored in one of your hidden user directory. Crtl + h will unhide e.g. /home// .xsane in my case ___ Great idea, but no cigar. ~/.sane and ~/.sa

F30 and php 7.3

2019-04-04 Thread sixpack13
Hallo upgrade and running F30 without any trouble. ***a big thanks folks !!!*** one inconvenience: I'm runnning baikal to sync calendars, etc. between thunderbird and my android smartphone. => http://sabre.io/baikal/ baikal currently doesn't support php 7.3.x (only 7.2.x) ! there are some inf

Re: how to check for disk fragmentation? [SOLVED]

2019-04-04 Thread home user via users
(Ed wrote) > These are produced by the "tracker" packages. > I, personally, couldn't find a need for them so I erased them > quite some time ago. I assume you deleted the files, not the packages. Mine were dated 2013, so I deleted them. > Do a "dnf info tracker" and "dnf info traker-miners" f

Re: sane : how to remove old scanners ?

2019-04-04 Thread sixpack13
I'm no expert, but I guess config's to/ for (?) old scanners are also stored in one of your hidden user directory. Crtl + h will unhide e.g. /home// .xsane in my case ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email t

Re: how to check for disk fragmentation? [SOLVED]

2019-04-04 Thread home user via users
(Samuel wrote) > There was a program called "e2defrag", but it was for ext2 only. > e2fsck will give you a fragmentation percent at the end. Just > don't forget the "-n" unless the partition is not mounted! I done it. - -bash.5[~]: e2fsck -nf [partition] e2fsck 1.44.2 (14-May-2018) Warning!

sane : how to remove old scanners ?

2019-04-04 Thread sean darcy
On fedora 29 , sane-backends 1.0.27. scanimage -L shows a number of scanners that are no longer connected, and haven't been used in years. In what file is this info stored ? Couldn't find any reference under /etc/sane.d. Is there a way to remove the old scanners from the command line ? sea