Re: google-chrome weirdness

2019-06-01 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
Hi Tom, Not what you asked, but Chrome no longer supports ad blockers to "enhance the user experience". In other words, to more effectively collect data/spy on you. https://developers.slashdot.org/story/19/05/31/2110257/google-struggles-to-justify-why-its-restricting-ad-blockers-in-chrome The

Re: google-chrome weirdness

2019-06-01 Thread Tim via users
On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 21:02 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > Amazing! I actually found it. ~/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf > had this stuff in it (for years and years and years in > order to make fonts look better when fedora was going > through a long "spindly" phase for fonts): > > ...[snip]... > >

Re: google-chrome weirdness

2019-06-01 Thread Tim via users
On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 20:38 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > Google-chrome has started rendering the "Oswald" web > font with all the characters in a string mostly on top > of one another, but only for my user. > > See: https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Oswald > > If I create a completely new user,

Re: Konqueror :-{

2019-06-01 Thread Ed Greshko
On 6/2/19 3:20 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 6/2/19 2:35 AM, Beartooth wrote: >> Second, man:/ brings me a sackload of stuff not from the man >> pages -- and again, that sackload seems to be covered all over with >> googleness, which disimproves my digestion. > Ahah!!! > > I see your problem.

Re: google-chrome weirdness

2019-06-01 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 20:38:31 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote: > So who knows where besides ~/.config/google-chrome > google-chrome will get information? Because something > about my user screws it up even when I try to start > from scratch with no saved profile. Amazing! I actually found it.

google-chrome weirdness

2019-06-01 Thread Tom Horsley
Google-chrome has started rendering the "Oswald" web font with all the characters in a string mostly on top of one another, but only for my user. See: https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Oswald If I create a completely new user, log out and log back in as new user, google-chrome works. That web

Re: dnf workstation collection

2019-06-01 Thread Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
" sixpack13" writes: > sudo dnf groupinstall "Fedora Workstation" I was wondering about that. I did it (without typing "y") on both and upgraded and a system with a fresh install. In the upgraded case I got a large list as expected. The unexpected part was that I had a shorter, but still

Re: Konqueror :-{

2019-06-01 Thread Ed Greshko
On 6/2/19 2:35 AM, Beartooth wrote: > Second, man:/ brings me a sackload of stuff not from the man > pages -- and again, that sackload seems to be covered all over with > googleness, which disimproves my digestion. Ahah!!! I see your problem. In konqueror there ar 2, count them 2, boxes

Re: Fedora 30 and problem with monitor resolution detection in gdm/Gnome?

2019-06-01 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 6/1/19 11:33 AM, Barry Scott wrote: You can look at the details with: $ xrandr --verboes | edid-decode The "Detailed timing" are the monitors prefered mode I recall. # find /sys/devices -name 'edid' /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/drm/card0/card0-HDMI-A-1/edid

Re: Fedora 30 and problem with monitor resolution detection in gdm/Gnome?

2019-06-01 Thread Barry Scott
> On 12 May 2019, at 23:47, Tom Horsley wrote: > > I have similar problems with using my LG OLEDB6P 4K TV as a > monitor. The nouveau driver seems to be confused by the > EDID information. Using X it picks some resolution the > monitor can't even display (invalid signal on monitor), > using

Re: Konqueror :-{

2019-06-01 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 6/1/19 3:25 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 00:02 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/31/19 8:05 PM, Tim via users wrote: On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 19:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: All these things can also be done with a USB thumbdrive, which is generally easier to

Re: dnf workstation collection

2019-06-01 Thread sixpack13
=> dnf grouplist was sudo dnf groupinstall "Fedora Workstation" meant ? maybe followed by an sudo dnf autoremove/distrosync ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: dnf workstation collection

2019-06-01 Thread Ed Greshko
On 6/1/19 8:58 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 05:18 -0700, Wolfgang S Rupprecht wrote: >> Is there a way to make sure a system that was upgraded multiple times >> instead of installed from scratch has all the rpm packages that the >> current workstation collection has? I

Re: dnf workstation collection

2019-06-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 05:18 -0700, Wolfgang S Rupprecht wrote: > Is there a way to make sure a system that was upgraded multiple times > instead of installed from scratch has all the rpm packages that the > current workstation collection has? I notice some things like the > login screen

Re: Why Must I Do "dnf clean all" Before Updating Will Proceed?

2019-06-01 Thread Garry T. Williams
On Friday, May 31, 2019 11:05:20 PM EDT Tim via users wrote: > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 17:18 -0400, Garry Williams wrote: > > But, of course, the issue is why this happens in the first place. > > Does your ISP insert a transparent proxy between you and the > internet? They're well known to cause

dnf workstation collection

2019-06-01 Thread Wolfgang S Rupprecht
Is there a way to make sure a system that was upgraded multiple times instead of installed from scratch has all the rpm packages that the current workstation collection has? I notice some things like the login screen wallpaper program that is present on fresh installs is missing from an upgraded

Re: Konqueror :-{

2019-06-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 00:02 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/31/19 8:05 PM, Tim via users wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 19:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > All these things can also be done with a USB thumbdrive, which is > > > generally easier to create and faster to use. > > > >

Re: Konqueror :-{

2019-06-01 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/31/19 8:05 PM, Tim via users wrote: On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 19:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: All these things can also be done with a USB thumbdrive, which is generally easier to create and faster to use. Well, not all. I wouldn't use one for back-ups. Why not? They are multiple