On 6/12/19 1:43 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Again, I am not sure to understand:
cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz
only add:
BuildRequires: perl-generators
in the .spec file
which does not help.
The spec file you get from cpanspec will need to be modified
Hello,
Again, I am not sure to understand:
cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz
only add:
BuildRequires: perl-generators
in the .spec file
which does not help.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:03:04 -0500
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, stan via users said:
> > The code page was a legitimate issue, but only part of the issue.
> > When I tried utf-8 for the /boot/efi partition booting failed. There
> > must be some hardcoded linking of vfat and ISO8859 so
Once upon a time, stan via users said:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:39:12 -0700
> stan wrote:
> > wasn't the signing, it was a missing code page for 8859-1. This is
> > the default code page for vfat in the kernel, so it couldn't read
> > the /boot/efi partition. Once I added the code page, the boo
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:39:12 -0700
stan wrote:
> The solution is that the kernel is already signed by the build
> process, when it is built from the Fedora kernel spec. The problem
This signature is the problem, as it is a red hat signature and has to
be removed. That was the other part of the
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:13:10 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I am not sure to take the point:
You focus on something else.
> I can run
> cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz
> --add-provide "perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) %{version}-%{release}"
>
> If it is correct.
On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 20:13 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:13:30 -0400
> Doug McGarrett wrote:
>
> > I find that it is difficult if not impossible
> > to make Thunderbird mark every
> > incidence of mail from a particular address as junk and reject it.
>
> This sort of thing
On 12/06/2019 10:10, Frank Elsner wrote:
Hello,
I have learned that there is podman, but all my Fedora 29 systems dont't know
about it :-(
When I try to install I get:
[root@siffux tmp]# dnf install podman
Adobe Systems Incorporated 16 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00
Fedora Modu
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:10:56 +0200 Frank Elsner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have learned that there is podman, but all my Fedora 29 systems dont't know
> about it :-(
And in the meantime I've learned podman has nothing to do with podcats and is
part of the atomic host feature.
Please ignore my prev
Hello,
I have learned that there is podman, but all my Fedora 29 systems dont't know
about it :-(
When I try to install I get:
[root@siffux tmp]# dnf install podman
Adobe Systems Incorporated 16 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00
Fedora Modular 29 - i386 2
10 matches
Mail list logo