Thanks, the selinux relabeling appears to have been it. Everything including
NetworkManager is back on track again!
Thank you very much for your patient efforts!!
Best wishes,
Ranjan
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 20:35:49 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 3/17/20 8:18 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Hi,
On 3/17/20 8:55 PM, home user wrote:
(On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 06:16, George wrote)
(responding to the whole message)
I'll try what you suggest tomorrow. I have only the one workstation. No
cell phone or mobile device, no laptops or notebooks, no wifi, old PCs,
etc. Not even old parts. So
(On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 06:16, George wrote)
(responding to the whole message)
I'll try what you suggest tomorrow. I have only the one workstation.
No cell phone or mobile device, no laptops or notebooks, no wifi, old
PCs, etc. Not even old parts. So the test will be removing the
On 3/17/20 8:35 PM, home user wrote:
(On 3/17/20 3:42 PM, Samuel wrote)
> If this was mentioned in a previous email, I missed it.
You did not miss anything (unless I've forgotten some of what I wrote!)
I forgot: Is nouveau the one that come from rpmfusion or the proprietary
one? I have the
On 3/17/20 8:18 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Hi, thanks. The wheel line reads:
wheel:x:10:username
So I guess it is there. However, I neither have sudo access or network manager.
Also, when I say
reboot,
That wasn't the command I gave you. It was:
/usr/sbin/reboot -f
But since you mentioned
(On 3/17/20 3:42 PM, Samuel wrote)
> If this was mentioned in a previous email, I missed it.
You did not miss anything (unless I've forgotten some of what I wrote!)
I forgot: Is nouveau the one that come from rpmfusion or the proprietary
one? I have the one that comes from rpmfusion, and is
Hi, thanks. The wheel line reads:
wheel:x:10:username
So I guess it is there. However, I neither have sudo access or network manager.
Also, when I say
reboot,
I get:
Failed to connect to bus: Connection refused
Does this shed any light. Thanks!
Mar 17, 2020 10:11:16 PM Samuel Sieb :
>
On 3/17/20 6:16 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
My apologies, but I still don't have sudo access and I have now lost network
manager.
id says exactly the same thing as before except that there is no "7(lp)" before
the context field.
Did the usermod command not work? If you boot with the
On 2020-03-18 10:06, David wrote:
>
> Mr. Ed Greshko and others on that list recommended I post my
> rants here.
>
I feel the need to correct your characterization of what was said on the "test"
list.
First of all, "rants" (as typically defined) aren't very welcome on this list
or most list to
This is a personal usage report.
This is my first post here, although I have been regularly posting
on the test listserve for about a month.
Mr. Ed Greshko and others on that list recommended I post my
rants here.
I use Rawhide in the real world on hardware as my only operating
system.My
My apologies, but I still don't have sudo access and I have now lost network
manager.
id says exactly the same thing as before except that there is no "7(lp)" before
the context field.
My apologies again for any inclarity but because I am not on the network I
cannot cut and paste and have to
On 3/17/20 6:04 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Hi, your latest suggestion resulted in success at the terminal but I don't have
network manager anymore or sudo access. So I have also lost access to the
network. What should I try? Thanks again, Ranjan
You still don't have sudo access? What does
Hi, your latest suggestion resulted in success at the terminal but I don't have
network manager anymore or sudo access. So I have also lost access to the
network. What should I try? Thanks again, Ranjan
___
users mailing list --
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 17:14, home user wrote:
> (On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 06:17, George wrote)
>
> > You need to rule out hardware.
> Impossible.
> Good testing can make a really good case that it's not the hardware (nor
> the driver).
> Complete testing, 100% ruling out, impossible.
>
2 or 3
Hi,
The iso is about 250 MB. The download links can be found here:
https://github.com/teo-en-ming/teo-en-ming-linux/blob/master/ISO%20Download%20Links%20(AUFS%20Support).txt
On 2020-03-18 02:08, Philip Rhoades wrote:
TDTEM,
Interesting! How big is the file system? I would like to try
On 3/17/20 3:19 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:11:46 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:53:26 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
Since I'm not sure which rescue setup you have, I'll give you the easier
method. At the grub menu edit the boot entry and add
On 2020-03-17 23:22, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> On 2020-03-17 22:45, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>> For a while now. firefox has a different behavior (font) for a specific web
>>> site.
>>> Actually, I have 2 machines, with the same installation, but the fonts
>>> used for a specific website differs from
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 14:47, home user wrote:
> (On 3/16/20 11:36 PM, Samuel wrote)
> > I assume you're using the original released F31 live image.
>
> No, I'm using whatever F-30 live image the Fedora Media Writer grabbed
> on March 12. Ah, here it is:
>
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:11:46 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did this.
>
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:53:26 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > On 3/17/20 2:34 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:54:59 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > >> Somehow you got dropped from the wheel
Hi,
I did this.
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:53:26 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 3/17/20 2:34 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:54:59 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >> Somehow you got dropped from the wheel group. Did you uncheck your
> >> administrator access in the user control
On 3/17/20 2:34 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:54:59 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
Somehow you got dropped from the wheel group. Did you uncheck your
administrator access in the user control panel? In any case, if you
don't have another admin user, you will need to use a live or
On 3/17/20 1:13 PM, home user wrote:
is that all? The graphics driver (the one that came from rmpfusion) is
still there, and my impression is that getting those out will be messy,
time-consuming, and risky. Then later I'd have to put them back, also
messy, time-consuming, and risky. If the
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:54:59 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 3/17/20 1:02 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:37:07 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >> On 3/17/20 11:42 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >>> I am on F31 and have always used sudo. This morning, after a while, I
> >>> finally
On 3/17/20 1:02 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:37:07 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 3/17/20 11:42 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I am on F31 and have always used sudo. This morning, after a while, I finally
rebooted and am on the 5.5.8-200.fc31.x86_64 kernel. However, I appear to
(On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 06:17, George wrote)
> You need to rule out hardware.
Impossible.
Good testing can make a really good case that it's not the hardware (nor
the driver).
Complete testing, 100% ruling out, impossible.
I must live with practical limits same as everyone else.
> To narrow
Hi,
Thanks!
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:37:07 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 3/17/20 11:42 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > I am on F31 and have always used sudo. This morning, after a while, I
> > finally rebooted and am on the 5.5.8-200.fc31.x86_64 kernel. However, I
> > appear to have lost my sudo
On 3/17/20 11:42 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I am on F31 and have always used sudo. This morning, after a while, I finally
rebooted and am on the 5.5.8-200.fc31.x86_64 kernel. However, I appear to have
lost my sudo access.
I get: that my username "is not in the sudoers file. This incident will
Hello,
I am on F31 and have always used sudo. This morning, after a while, I finally
rebooted and am on the 5.5.8-200.fc31.x86_64 kernel. However, I appear to have
lost my sudo access.
I get: that my username "is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be
reported."
Not sure how this
On 3/17/20 10:46 AM, home user wrote:
(On 3/16/20 11:36 PM, Samuel wrote)
> I assume you're using the original released F31 live image.
No, I'm using whatever F-30 live image the Fedora Media Writer grabbed
on March 12. Ah, here it is:
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-1.2.iso
I do not know
(On 3/16/20 11:36 PM, Samuel wrote)
> I assume you're using the original released F31 live image.
No, I'm using whatever F-30 live image the Fedora Media Writer grabbed
on March 12. Ah, here it is:
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-1.2.iso
I do not know how up-to-date that actually is.
> Or
Subject: Teo En Ming's Linux From Scratch (LFS) 20200302-systemd
Bootable Live CD/DVD Kernel Panic
Good day from Singapore to all Linux users,
Recently, on 12 March 2020, I have successfully created my own custom
Linux distribution which I affectionately call it Teo En Ming Linux.
My custom
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 5:42 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > I can use Skype by using my headphones microphone and the computer
> > speakers to listen to the audio. However, some people comment that my
> > voice is not so clear on Skype. Is there some way of improving the
> > audio quality on Skype
>
> On 2020-03-17 22:45, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > For a while now. firefox has a different behavior (font) for a specific web
> > site.
> > Actually, I have 2 machines, with the same installation, but the fonts
> > used for a specific website differs from one machine to the other one.
> > The
On 2020-03-17 22:45, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> For a while now. firefox has a different behavior (font) for a specific web
> site.
> Actually, I have 2 machines, with the same installation, but the fonts
> used for a specific website differs from one machine to the other one.
> The preferences are
https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/speeding-container-buildah
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hello,
For a while now. firefox has a different behavior (font) for a specific web
site.
Actually, I have 2 machines, with the same installation, but the fonts
used for a specific website differs from one machine to the other one.
The preferences are identical (as much as I can say).
Is there a
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:17:10 -0300
George N. White III wrote:
> This can be hardware or a driver issue. Graphics is a prime suspect.
> Live distros are useful for checking hardware compatibility.
Freezing display is the symptom I always get with nvidia
hardware and the nouveau drivers. The
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 21:58, home user wrote:
> Let's go back to the core problems and need.
>
> The problems:
> 1. Fedora Live (made last week, on a USB-2 stick) sometimes freezes
> shortly after the boot is done. That is, when I'm typing or scrolling,
> the display stops changing, the cursor
2 steps: file -> RPM and then RPM -> Repo.
File -> RPM
rpm -qf /usr/bin/google-chrome
google-chrome-stable-80.0.3987.132-1.x86_64
RPM -> Repo
dnf info google-chrome-stable | grep -e ^Name -e ^From -e ^Version
Name : google-chrome-stable
Version : 80.0.3987.132
From repo
On 17.03.20 14:33, Neal Becker wrote:
Is there a way to query dnf to tell which which repo a given file or a given
rpm came from?
rpm -qf
=> package name
dnf list installed | grep -i
=> last column shows the repo
could do it
--
sixpack13
On 2020-03-17 21:33, Neal Becker wrote:
> Is there a way to query dnf to tell which which repo a given file or a given
> rpm came from?
You mean like
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf info vlc
Installed Packages
Name : vlc
Epoch : 1
Version : 3.0.9
Release : 33.fc31
Is there a way to query dnf to tell which which repo a given file or a given
rpm came from?
Thanks,
Neal
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 3/16/20 12:16 PM, Beartooth wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 19:28:39 +0100, sixpack13 wrote:
means to download them ???
I really don't think there are any images. It's just an artifact of the
generating process and your mind. The description definitely suggests
that it's algorithmic.
43 matches
Mail list logo
