Re: KDE System Monitor Widget Problem after upgrade to Fedora-33

On Saturday, November 21, 2020 7:24:06 PM EST Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > Th KDE System Monitor Widget does not display Network Speed. You might want to look at the Network Speed widget under Add Widgets. -- Garry T. Williams ___ users mailing list --

Re: Waterfox?

On 2020-11-21 17:11, Tim via users wrote: On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 13:02 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Some sites just refuse to work correctly with Firefox. I haven't come across that since Win98 era. I wonder, though, if they're really rejecting you because you're running Linux. When

Re: Post F32->F33 upgrade rsync w ssh fails

Hi, Max Pyziur wrote: > But in the current world, tougher rather than looser encryption is better. With that in mind, instead of using older/weaker crypto on your Fedora host, you could use newer/stronger crypto from your CentOS 6 client¹. Something like: - Create an ECDSA key ssh-keygen -t

Re: Post F32->F33 upgrade rsync w ssh fails

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Hi On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:14:23 -0500 Max Pyziur wrote: Even though I had done the F33 upgrade sometime ago, I am only now seeing that it appears to have affected my rsync backups. When my CentOS server issues the rsync backup the

Re: Waterfox?

On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 13:02 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Some sites just refuse to work correctly with Firefox. I haven't come across that since Win98 era. I wonder, though, if they're really rejecting you because you're running Linux. When you (try to) browse a site, there's a scad

Re: KDE System Monitor Widget Problem after upgrade to Fedora-33

On 22/11/2020 08:24, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: Th KDE System Monitor Widget does not display Network Speed.  There is a box on the panel where the network load would normally be shown. Relevant Sensors are: "Download Rate" and "Upload Rate". System is * Fedora-33 (as of this afternoon) *

KDE System Monitor Widget Problem after upgrade to Fedora-33

Th KDE System Monitor Widget does not display Network Speed.  There is a box on the panel where the network load would normally be shown.   Relevant Sensors are:  "Download Rate" and "Upload Rate". System is  * Fedora-33 (as of this afternoon) * System Monitor Sensor 1.0 * KDE Frameworks

Re: Waterfox?

On 2020-11-21 06:15, Kevin Becker wrote: On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 16:30 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: For instance, I have both a home and a business Amazon account.  Switching back and forth between the two is a YUGE pain in the   Especially since the cookies and such still get mixed

Re: Post F32->F33 upgrade rsync w ssh fails

Hi On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:14:23 -0500 Max Pyziur wrote: > Even though I had done the F33 upgrade sometime ago, I am only now seeing > that it appears to have affected my rsync backups. When my CentOS server > issues the rsync backup the following error appears: > no hostkey alg > rsync:

Re: Post F32->F33 upgrade rsync w ssh fails

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:14:23 -0500 (EST) Max Pyziur wrote: > Any suggestions on how to resolve this? I f33 install had to fiddle my ~/.ssh/config file to allow "deprecated" key types for my hostgator web page I update with rsync (hostgator is running an old ssh server version) I added these

Post F32->F33 upgrade rsync w ssh fails

Greetings, Even though I had done the F33 upgrade sometime ago, I am only now seeing that it appears to have affected my rsync backups. When my CentOS server issues the rsync backup the following error appears: no hostkey alg rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far)

Re: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

On 11/20/20 3:40 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 4:31 PM Frank Elsner > wrote: > > If it carrys an ISO9660 file system simpy mount it and play with > any player. > > > No that's not what I meant by reading. > > I meant before you

Re: Waterfox?

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:16 AM Kevin Becker wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 16:30 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > For instance, I have both a home and a business Amazon > > account. Switching back and forth between the two > > is a YUGE pain in the Especially since the > >

Re: Waterfox?

On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 16:30 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > For instance, I have both a home and a business Amazon > account.  Switching back and forth between the two > is a YUGE pain in the   Especially since the > cookies and such still get mixed up even when I log > out and into

Re: Waterfox?

It's a binary ready to go once unpacked. WC is a FF-57 type browser, and uses the old FF add-ons. User-agent-switcher doesn't satisfy my bank, even when I disable or remove uBlockOrigin and NoScript, although it helps with many other sites. Speed-wise, I don't notice any obvious speed

Re: How use thin snapshots with a non-thin root filesystem ?

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 2:09 PM Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > It seems I can convert: > > > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/6/html/logical_volume_manager_administration/thinly_provisioned_volume_creation > > But unfortunately, this is a destructive

Re: How use thin snapshots with a non-thin root filesystem ?

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 2:00 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > I'm pretty sure that you can only make a thin snaphot from a thin LV. > It seems I can convert:

Re: How use thin snapshots with a non-thin root filesystem ?

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 2:00 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > I'm pretty sure that you can only make a thin snaphot from a thin LV. > Can my non-thin LV be converted to a thin LV now ? -- Regards, Sreyan Chakravarty ___ users mailing list --

Re: Unusually long boot times with LVM Snapshots

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 2:00 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > My experience is LVM thick (traditional) snapshots are slow. Where LVM > thin provisioning snapshots address quite allot faster. > Yes I just said that. -- Regards, Sreyan Chakravarty ___ users

Re: How use thin snapshots with a non-thin root filesystem ?

On 11/21/20 12:25 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: I am looking into thin snapshots since the older COW snapshots delay my boot enormously. My normal root fs is on a normal "non-thin" volume. So to make a snapshot I have boot into a live cd environment then set my root fs volume to read-only

Re: Unusually long boot times with LVM Snapshots

My experience is LVM thick (traditional) snapshots are slow. Where LVM thin provisioning snapshots address quite allot faster. Chris Murphy ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

How use thin snapshots with a non-thin root filesystem ?

I am looking into thin snapshots since the older COW snapshots delay my boot enormously. My normal root fs is on a normal "non-thin" volume. So to make a snapshot I have boot into a live cd environment then set my root fs volume to read-only and then set it to inactive. Commands: sudo