Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: > This would also be of interest to you... > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672504 > The link was helpful. I have one more question: - Where is this countme variable sent? Is it to Fedora itself (the host getfedora.org), or the package mirrors, that

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On 02/05/2021 10:28, ml-de...@keemail.me wrote: - And, have you read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Better_Counting I went through it; it seems like there's no UUID created—just a "countme" variable. Is that right? This

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On 02/05/2021 10:28, ml-de...@keemail.me wrote: - And, have you read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Better_Counting I went through it; it seems like there's no UUID created—just a "countme" variable. Is that right? Corr

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

- And, have you read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Better_Counting I went through it; it seems like there's no UUID created—just a "countme" variable. Is that right? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe sen

Re: F33->F34: paps output has changed

On Fri, 30 Apr 2021, Garry T. Williams wrote: On Friday, April 30, 2021 12:45:40 PM EDT Max Pyziur wrote: I would be interested in suggestions from other paps users on their preferred Heh. Never tried this program before. I always use a2ps instead. But... I tried --font="monospace 6" --col

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On 02/05/2021 09:35, None via users wrote: I recently got to know that Fedora's DNF creates an UUID to help keep track of the number of unique Fedora users. As per my understanding, before implementing this UUID mechanism, they obtained their user-base estimate through the use of IP addresses.

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On 02/05/2021 09:35, None via users wrote: - Is there any way to opt out of providing data for this user-base statistical analysis? Yes. Go to /etc/yum.repos.d and remove "countme=1" from any of *.repo files. -- Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.

Questions on DNF's UUID

Hello everyone. I recently got to know that Fedora's DNF creates an UUID to help keep track of the number of unique Fedora users. As per my understanding, before implementing this UUID mechanism, they obtained their user-base estimate through the use of IP addresses.     I would appreciate it i

Re: Restored f33 on new drive from a tarball now a problem

On 2021-04-25 4:09 p.m., Robert McBroom via users wrote: I can get to the F33 from an f31 install on the same computer, mounted on /mnt/sysimage and doing the binds to /dev, /proc, and /sys followed by chroot gets me in to look at everything. Everything I look into looks correct. Short of idea

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 01/05/2021 17:28, Jack Craig wrote: On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 2:19 AM Ed Greshko mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote: 2.  Configure your DNS server with, I think the correct term is "views", such that an internal system query returns internal IP addresses (10.0.0.X) and an interna

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 5:25 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 20:07, Tim via users wrote: > > On Sat, 2021-05-01 at 12:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> You are missing the fact that you attempting to run a *public* DNS > >> server. > >> > >> That means that your DNS server must accept queries

A problem with wine and fedora 34

Hello everyone, Just recently I have installed wine on Fedora 34, with gnome 40, and all the defaults, but when ever I install an application and try to start it, this happens: Application could not be started, or no application associated with the specified file. ShellExecuteEx failed: Fil

Re: Upgrading 33 to 34. Small problems

On 2021-05-01 3:08 p.m., Matti Pulkkinen wrote: la, 2021-05-01 kello 14:52 -0400, Frank kirjoitti: Upgraded Fedora 33 to 34 yesterday following the Fedora recommendations. It went well but today I noticed two small problems. Every once in a while sound stops working...pulse audio show no devi

Re: Upgrading 33 to 34. Small problems

la, 2021-05-01 kello 14:52 -0400, Frank kirjoitti: > Upgraded Fedora 33 to 34 yesterday following the Fedora > recommendations. > > It went well but today I noticed two small problems. > > Every once in a while sound stops working...pulse audio show no > devices > at all. Was this after suspen

Upgrading 33 to 34. Small problems

Upgraded Fedora 33 to 34 yesterday following the Fedora recommendations. It went well but today I noticed two small problems. Every once in a while sound stops working...pulse audio show no devices at all. I know pipewire is the default now so I have no idea how to resolve this intermittent

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 5/1/21 10:19 AM, Mike Wright wrote: > On 4/30/21 9:31 PM, Jack Craig wrote: > ps. Here is another set that includes your mailserver data based on the SOA. $TTL 3D; default ttl for records without a specified lifetime $ORIGIN linuxlighthouse.com. @ IN SOA ws.linuxlighthouse.com.

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 4/30/21 9:31 PM, Jack Craig wrote: On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 9:05 PM Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/05/2021 11:46, Jack Craig wrote: adding 108.220.213.121 to /etc/resolv.conf also doesnt seem to help... That file has nothing to do with the DNS server. I thought that list of NSs was the NS li

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 4/30/21 1:32 PM, Jack Craig wrote: almost, but no seegar,... i and continuing to have dig lookups for linuxlighthouse.com a is timing out(refused or servfail) anyone see my misconfiguration?? one error i need to address, my domain is 'linuxlighthouse.com' i have mistakenly tried to include

Re: Restored f33 on new drive from a tarball now a problem

On 4/29/21 6:16 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 30/04/2021 04:17, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 4/26/21 12:23 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 4/25/21 7:23 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: I have never tried using a tar file to restore.  However using tar (both creating and restoring) without using

Re: Exactly what is "tor"?

On 01/05/2021 20:12, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: The Tor Project distribute their own build of Firefox I think. Iǘe used it a few times. If one installs the torbrowser-launcher package and then runs it it will go through the process of downloading their build for you and setting everything up

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 01/05/2021 20:05, Tim via users wrote: On Sat, 2021-05-01 at 17:28 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: If you're not going to serve email and your not going to use email addresses in the linuxlighthouse.com domain then you don't want to define MX records. Or, you have an MX record that points to where

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 01/05/2021 20:07, Tim via users wrote: On Sat, 2021-05-01 at 12:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: You are missing the fact that you attempting to run a *public* DNS server. That means that your DNS server must accept queries from *any* source address. allow-query { any; }; is what you'll nee

Re: btrfs

On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 21:58 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > With fedora32, I created a btrfs partition with gparted > > fdisk see it as of type 83, ie. like a ext4 partition. Partition types can preselect a preferred filing system format, but you can override that and format them with a different s

Re: Exactly what is "tor"?

On Sat, 2021-05-01 at 07:24 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > ToddAndMargo via users writes: > > > Hi All, > > > > I went to tor's web site, but could not figure out > > what exactly it was or how to use it with my browser. > > > > > > Tor is a multi-level proxy with layered encryption. You

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Sat, 2021-05-01 at 12:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > You are missing the fact that you attempting to run a *public* DNS > server. > > That means that your DNS server must accept queries from *any* source > address. > > allow-query { any; }; > > is what you'll need. Supplemental info: You

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Sat, 2021-05-01 at 17:28 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > If you're not going to serve email and your not going to use email > addresses in the linuxlighthouse.com domain then you don't want to > define MX records. Or, you have an MX record that points to where your email is being hosted by something

Re: Exactly what is "tor"?

ToddAndMargo via users writes: Hi All, I went to tor's web site, but could not figure out what exactly it was or how to use it with my browser. Tor is a multi-level proxy with layered encryption. You connect to one Tor node, the connection is proxied to another Tor node, before the fi

Using the logs to detect a problem with webcam on OBS-Studio

Dear All, After having upgraded from F33 to F34, my webcam was still detected by OBS-Studio. However, it did not display any image -- only a black rectangle. It took me a lot of time to find out the cause: The resolution of my webcam on OBS-Studio was configured as "Leave unchanged" and it shou

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 01/05/2021 17:28, Jack Craig wrote: I'll hold off deciding this for the moment, i need some sleep, ... Still, i got a start on views/zones and /etc/named.conf is currently setup as .. * * *view "wan-view" { zone "linuxlighthouse.com " {            type master;    

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 2:19 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 16:31, Ed Greshko wrote: > > After I sent the previous post I realized what I *think* is your goal. If > I recall you're wanting your > DNS server to service queries from inside your network as well as from > outside. > > As curren

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 01/05/2021 17:16, Jack Craig wrote: Well I'm not going to serve mailbut,  I do want to have my DNS properly configured . so chasing down and resolving all these little issues is next If you're not going to serve email and your not going to use email addresses in the linuxlighthouse.com dom

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 01/05/2021 16:31, Ed Greshko wrote: After I sent the previous post I realized what I *think* is your goal.  If I recall you're wanting your DNS server to service queries from inside your network as well as from outside. As currently configured your DNS server is acting as an external/public

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 1:32 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 15:31, Jack Craig wrote: > > seems t be working better, how many holes do you see at this point?? > > Since this now works > Well let's say it's limping along, as you point out below, it has some issues but that's great huge s

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 01/05/2021 15:31, Jack Craig wrote: seems t be working better, how many holes do you see at this point?? Since this now works [egreshko@meimei ~]$ host ws.linuxlighthouse.com ws.linuxlighthouse.com has address 108.220.213.121 ws.linuxlighthouse.com mail is handled by 10 ws.linuxlighthou

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:14 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 12:31, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 9:05 PM Ed Greshko > wrote: > > > > On 01/05/2021 11:46, Jack Craig wrote: > > > adding 108.220.213.121 to /etc/resolv.conf also