On 2021-05-02 2:52 p.m., Ranbir wrote:
On Sun, 2021-04-18 at 14:08 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
That could be it. I gave up though and just did it from my Windows 10
laptop.
I'll say again that I've found using kdeconnect faster and more
reliable than BT.
So, I either use that or sftp from an
Wolfgang Pfeiffer writes:
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 11:09:20AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I just started the upgrade on another laptop, but after plymouth came
up, it bumped down to the system console to run the upgrade. It's
running now just fine, on the system console. I don't recall if
Ed Greshko writes:
On 02/05/2021 23:09, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I was surprised to see that "dnf system-upgrade log" offered me logs going
all the way back to the F30-F31 upgrade in 2019. They certainly don't take
up much space, but I'm just wondering if they ever get cleaned up. I don't
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 11:09:20AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I just started the upgrade on another laptop, but after plymouth came
up, it bumped down to the system console to run the upgrade. It's
running now just fine, on the system console. I don't recall if this
laptop always did that,
On 02/05/2021 23:09, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I was surprised to see that "dnf system-upgrade log" offered me logs going all the way back to the F30-F31 upgrade in 2019. They certainly don't take up much space, but I'm just wondering if they ever get cleaned up. I don't see a dnf option to do that.
On Sun, 2021-04-18 at 14:08 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Today I tried transferring files from both a Samsung phone and Google
> Pixel phone and
> both failed. As I mentioned, it has been awhile since I've tried
> this. Then I recalled
> I had changed my Bluetooth Dongle. I put the old one back
On 03/05/2021 04:56, Doug H. wrote:
That says that ws.linuxlighthouse.com is the one and only name server for the
domain. Whereas whois shows the more normal 2 minimum:
whois LINUXLIGHTHOUSE.COM | grep ^Name
Name Server: WS.LINUXLIGHTHOUSE.COM
Name Server: NS3.ATTDNS.COM
So, even if you let
On Sat, May 1, 2021, at 2:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> BTW, if you decide to go ahead with using views it would be helpful if you
> have
> a system on the "outside" for you to use to test queries.
>
> As I understand it, all your "internal" systems have 10.0.0.X IP addresses.
Yup. Something
On 2021-05-02 8:52 a.m., None via users wrote:
Is there a way to disable non-HTTPS mirrors? I don't see any reason why
your ISP should be able to see what distribution you use, and most
importantly, the exact package versions you're installing/updating. (I
know DNF will only install signed
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 09:35:23PM +0930, Tim via users wrote:
...
If I do (still as the root user): ll /run/user/1000/
ls: cannot access /run/user/1000/gvfs: Permission denied
total 0
drwx--. 2 tim tim 60 May 2 21:25 dconf
d?? ? ? ? ?? gvfs
drwx--. 2 tim
Michal Domonkos wrote:
> Another correction - turns out I didn't read Stan's reply carefully;
he says it's sent to a mirror, however that's not the case :) It's
just the MirrorManager instance that receives it.
Ah, I see. Many thanks for the clarification.
Matthew Miller wrote:
> I hope
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 03:35:48AM +0200, None via users wrote:
> I recently got to know that Fedora's DNF creates an UUID to help keep
> track of the number of unique Fedora users.
It does not. I initially proposed this, similar to what openSUSE does, but
the actual implementation does not use a
I updated a laptop to F34. The laptop uses the spinfinity plymouth theme.
system-upgrade ran while the theme was chugging along, showing brief status
messages in a top level corner, i.e. "Updating ". This is my
regular upgrade experience; and nothin unusual about that.
I just started the
On 2 May 2021 at 21:35, Tim via users wrote:
Subject:Re: Question about broken link files?
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent: Sun, 02 May 2021 21:35:23 +0930
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora
users
From:
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:47 PM Michal Domonkos wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:15 PM stan via users
> wrote:
> > I think the answer to your question is that the variable is sent to
> > the mirror, so yes, a mirror will receive the flag. However, they
> > appear to have gone to great lengths
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:47 PM Michal Domonkos wrote:
> 1) the age of the installation (one of 4 values, see the link above)
Oh, just a little correction - there were some later changes made to
that man page (the age "buckets" in particular) that are not reflected
in the linked PR, so please
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:15 PM stan via users
wrote:
> I think the answer to your question is that the variable is sent to
> the mirror, so yes, a mirror will receive the flag. However, they
> appear to have gone to great lengths to avoid leaking any
> identifiable information. See this link:
>
Since installing fedora 34 I have no input from microphone.
The microphone appears in audiomixer (pavucontrol I assume)
All modules seem to be loaded and playback is fine
the only error message I can see is from dmesg -T
traps: gnome-sound-rec[2335] trap int3 ip:7f9b4652df7f sp:7ffdf71ddc70
On Sun, 2 May 2021 05:12:55 +0200 (CEST)
None via users wrote:
> ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
>
> > This would also be of interest to you...
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672504
> >
> The link was helpful. I have one more question:
>
> - Where is this countme variable
On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 23:21, Max Pyziur wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2021, Garry T. Williams wrote:
>
> > On Friday, April 30, 2021 12:45:40 PM EDT Max Pyziur wrote:
> >> I would be interested in suggestions from other paps users on their
> >> preferred
> >
> > Heh. Never tried this program before.
On 02/05/2021 20:05, Tim via users wrote:
There is no /proc/1853 anything. So was that a broken link pointing to
there, or was it finding something from there, that's now disappeared?
Kinda weird to be searching for stuff in /proc which is so dynamic.
I bet if you ran that same command
On Sun, 2021-05-02 at 18:05 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II via users
wrote:
> Ran the following command in / to see what it finds.
> find . -xtype l >/badlinks
>
> Summary of results of broken links by top directory
> /etc 15
> /home 17
> /proc 170
> /root 2
> /run 145
> /usr 325
> 674
>
> Not an
On 2 May 2021 at 17:12, Qiyu Yan wrote:
Subject:Re: Question about broken link files?
From: Qiyu Yan
To: Community support for Fedora users
Date sent: Sun, 02 May 2021 17:12:41 +0800
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> 在 2021-05-02星期日的 18:05 +1000，Michael
On 02/05/2021 16:05, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
Just upgraded my notebook to sdd drive and then did dnf
update to Fedora 33.
Ran the following command in / to see what it finds.
find . -xtype l >/badlinks
Summary of results of broken links by top directory
/etc 15
/home 17
/proc 170
在 2021-05-02星期日的 18:05 +1000，Michael D. Setzer II via users写道：
> Just upgraded my notebook to sdd drive and then did dnf
> update to Fedora 33.
>
> Ran the following command in / to see what it finds.
> find . -xtype l >/badlinks
>
> Summary of results of broken links by top directory
> /etc
Just upgraded my notebook to sdd drive and then did dnf
update to Fedora 33.
Ran the following command in / to see what it finds.
find . -xtype l >/badlinks
Summary of results of broken links by top directory
/etc 15
/home 17
/proc 170
/root 2
/run 145
/usr 325
674
Not an awful lot, but
26 matches
Mail list logo
