Re: Restored f33 on new drive from a tarball now a problem

On 2021-05-03 9:33 p.m., Robert McBroom via users wrote: To happy to soon, Did an update to get current and on reboot and login the entire system is read only. Looking at directories with emacs and all permissions look fine but any attempt to write fails. Check the log to see why.

Re: Restored f33 on new drive from a tarball now a problem

On 5/1/21 9:59 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 4/29/21 6:16 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 30/04/2021 04:17, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 4/26/21 12:23 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 4/25/21 7:23 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: I have never tried using a tar file to restore.  However usin

Re: F34 cannot load kernel modules

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:01 AM Paul Smith wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 7:58 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > > > I have just upgraded from F33 to F34, and everything seems to be > > > working fine except when booting: a message appears saying: > > > > > > Failed to load kernel modules. > > > >

Re: dnf system-upgrade dependency resolution failure

On 5/3/21 4:28 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I'm trying to update a system that has some locally-built packages. They get installed from a local repository. I rebuilt all the packages in mock for F34. Problem 1: problem with installed package libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc33.20210503063

Re: dns wrap up

On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 13:42 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > $TTL 3D; default ttl for records without a specified lifetime > $ORIGIN linuxlighthouse.com. > linuxlighthouse.com. CAA 0 issue "letsencrypt.org" > @ IN SOA ws.linuxlighthouse.com. root.linuxlighthouse.com. ( >

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 11:56 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > i think you are right, i've been wondering about the ns3's behaviour > as the dnscheck page keeps telling me i have only one responding dns. > as it is part of the at&t dns, i have been ignoring this; now is the > time to deal with it > >

Re: dns wrap up

On 04/05/2021 06:13, Ed Greshko wrote: *5. dns config file* ; $TTL 3D; default ttl for records without a specified lifetime $ORIGIN linuxlighthouse.com . linuxlighthouse.com . CAA   0 issue "letsencrypt.org

Re: dns wrap up

On 5/3/21 1:42 PM, Jack Craig wrote: as this thread is approaching 100 msgs, time for a wrap up. below is where i *Think* i am, ;) *1. thanks to all that have provided dns configuration/testing insights* *2. i am not going to serve email* *3. i am not going to use views in named.conf, /

Re: dns wrap up

On 04/05/2021 04:42, Jack Craig wrote: *3. i am not going to use views in named.conf, /etc/hosts trimmed to include only 127.0.0.1 & ::1 * How many hosts are internal?  If you don't define 10.0.0.x ip/hostnames in your /etc/hosts then how will you get the internal address of internal hosts?

dns wrap up

as this thread is approaching 100 msgs, time for a wrap up. below is where i *Think* i am, ;) *1. thanks to all that have provided dns configuration/testing insights* *2. i am not going to serve email* *3. i am not going to use views in named.conf, /etc/hosts trimmed to include only 127.0

Re: Running Fedora in Memory

On 5/3/21 1:24 PM, Earl Ramirez wrote: What do you mean by "in memory"?  And how much memory? Currently the LiveOS can run off a USB/DVD what I am asking is if the OS can be loaded into RAM so that the removable media is no longer needed. I expect you could and I think I've done it with a ne

Re: on to letsencrypt

thx ed, i spent a whole day a week or so a couple weeks back to verify this secondary dns. i could swear that they said then i provide primary, they provide secondary. i'll pursue this more directly now. On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 1:24 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 04/05/2021 02:56, Jack Craig wrote: >

Re: Running Fedora in Memory

> > What do you mean by "in memory"?  And how much memory? Currently the LiveOS can run off a USB/DVD what I am asking is if the OS can be loaded into RAM so that the removable media is no longer needed. At a minimum of 2GB. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part __

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 04/05/2021 02:56, Jack Craig wrote: That says that ws.linuxlighthouse.com is the one and only name server for the domain. Whereas whois shows the more normal 2 minimum: >whois LINUXLIGHTHOUSE.COM | grep ^Name Name Ser

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 04/05/2021 03:54, Mike Wright wrote: On 5/3/21 11:56 AM, Jack Craig wrote: *as an aside, if i add  'www in a  108.220.213.121'* oops, missed that one ;D Yes.  That is the right way to add a host.  Just duplicate the ws line and change the ws to www. fyi, the line below ws ... without

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 5/3/21 11:56 AM, Jack Craig wrote: *as an aside, if i add 'www in a 108.220.213.121'* oops, missed that one ;D Yes. That is the right way to add a host. Just duplicate the ws line and change the ws to www. fyi, the line below ws ... without a host specified is the one that also a

Re: on to letsencrypt

> Date: Monday, May 03, 2021 12:32:22 -0700 > From: Mike Wright > > On 5/3/21 11:56 AM, Jack Craig wrote: > > >> >> *is my registrar or attdns the player to whine to? > > Your registrar. Your "control panel" should allow you to update > your nameservers yourself. I don't think "whine to" i

Re: Running Fedora in Memory

On 5/3/21 12:20 PM, Earl Ramirez wrote: Has anyone used Fedora in memory? I saw that there are couple OSes that are capable of doing this and wonder if this is possible to achieve this with Fedora. What do you mean by "in memory"? And how much memory? __

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 5/3/21 11:56 AM, Jack Craig wrote: *is my registrar or attdns the player to whine to? Your registrar. Your "control panel" should allow you to update your nameservers yourself. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs

Running Fedora in Memory

Dear All, Has anyone used Fedora in memory? I saw that there are couple OSes that are capable of doing this and wonder if this is possible to achieve this with Fedora. Thanks -- Kind Regards, Earl A. Ramirez 2021-05-03T21:14:59 (CEST +0200) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: F34 - what happened to Switch User?

On 5/3/21 6:36 AM, Temlakos wrote: On 5/3/21 9:12 AM, Tim via users wrote: On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 07:48 -0400, Temlakos wrote: What am I missing? If Switch User is still there, where did it go? If you lock the screen, is there a switch user option in there? No. It has every option except that:

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 1:58 PM Doug H. wrote: > On Sat, May 1, 2021, at 2:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > BTW, if you decide to go ahead with using views it would be helpful if > you have > > a system on the "outside" for you to use to test queries. > > > > As I understand it, all your "internal"

Re: Have virtual consoles been moved?

On 04/05/2021 00:07, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 10:16 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 02:39:19PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: IIRC in every previous Fedora release console 1 (i.e. what you get if hitting Ctrl-Alt-F1) has been the default, and F2 e

Re: Have virtual consoles been moved?

On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 10:16 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 02:39:19PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > IIRC in every previous Fedora release console 1 (i.e. what you get > > if > > hitting Ctrl-Alt-F1) has been the default, and F2 etc. got you > > additional text consol

Re: Have virtual consoles been moved?

If it's relevant, I'm running KDE Plasma on X11 as it's still no usable on wayland for me. --- Best regards, Alex ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, May 3rd, 2021 at 16:16, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 02:39:19PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > IIRC in ev

Re: Fedora 34, kde, wayland, klipper, no primary selection

Aleksandar Kostadinov wrote: > Hi, > > I just upgraded from Fedora 32. Now KDE uses wayland. I configure in > clipboard settings to sync primary seletion to no avail. Primary > selection only usable within the same window. > > I read on the internet it should be working. It works in some situat

Re: Have virtual consoles been moved?

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 02:39:19PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > IIRC in every previous Fedora release console 1 (i.e. what you get if > hitting Ctrl-Alt-F1) has been the default, and F2 etc. got you > additional text consoles as required. Now I find that the default is F2 > and F1 is a blank

Re: Have virtual consoles been moved?

On 03/05/2021 22:01, Ed Greshko wrote: On 03/05/2021 21:39, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: IIRC in every previous Fedora release console 1 (i.e. what you get if hitting Ctrl-Alt-F1) has been the default, and F2 etc. got you additional text consoles as required. Now I find that the default is F2 and

Re: Have virtual consoles been moved?

Yes, I've noticed that as well at least on KDE release, F1 - blank; F2 - default; F3 - tty3 with console --- Best regards, Alex ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, May 3rd, 2021 at 15:39, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > IIRC in every previous Fedora release console 1 (i.e. what you get

Re: Have virtual consoles been moved?

On 03/05/2021 21:39, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: IIRC in every previous Fedora release console 1 (i.e. what you get if hitting Ctrl-Alt-F1) has been the default, and F2 etc. got you additional text consoles as required. Now I find that the default is F2 and F1 is a blank screen. This is on KDE/Pl

Have virtual consoles been moved?

IIRC in every previous Fedora release console 1 (i.e. what you get if hitting Ctrl-Alt-F1) has been the default, and F2 etc. got you additional text consoles as required. Now I find that the default is F2 and F1 is a blank screen. This is on KDE/Plasma. Has there been a policy change or is somethi

Re: F34 - what happened to Switch User?

On 5/3/21 9:12 AM, Tim via users wrote: On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 07:48 -0400, Temlakos wrote: What am I missing? If Switch User is still there, where did it go? If you lock the screen, is there a switch user option in there? No. It has every option except that: sleep, hibernate, restart, shutdow

Re: F34 - what happened to Switch User?

On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 22:42 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 07:48 -0400, Temlakos wrote: > > What am I missing? If Switch User is still there, where did it go? > > If you lock the screen, is there a switch user option in there? The OP already asked on the KDE list and was told

Re: F34 - what happened to Switch User?

On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 07:48 -0400, Temlakos wrote: > What am I missing? If Switch User is still there, where did it go? If you lock the screen, is there a switch user option in there? -- uname -rsvp Linux 5.11.16-100.fc32.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Apr 21 13:43:38 UTC 2021 x86_64 Boilerplate: All un

Re: Receiving files via Bluetooth

On Sun, 2021-05-02 at 19:56 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > Even faster is to plug it into a USB port and directly transfer the > files. I had to get into the secret developer mode to make that work on my Samsung phone. -- uname -rsvp Linux 5.11.16-100.fc32.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Apr 21 13:43:38 UTC 2

F34 - what happened to Switch User?

Everyone: Last week I did my usual command-line upgrade, from F33 to F34. Most things still work, and some (like the KDE clipboard) work better. But of course the Applications menu changed radically. It took time for me to find the new places for things, and one thing I never found: Switch U

dnf system-upgrade dependency resolution failure

I'm trying to update a system that has some locally-built packages. They get installed from a local repository. I rebuilt all the packages in mock for F34. Problem 1: problem with installed package libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc33.20210503063931.x86_64 - libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.2

Re: After latest dnfupate Firefox taking about 2:43 to load??

On 3 May 2021 at 19:22, Michael D. Setzer II via user wrote: To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Date sent: Mon, 03 May 2021 19:22:18 +1000 Subject:After latest dnfupate Firefox taking about 2:43 to load?? Priority: normal Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users

Re: Exactly what is "tor"?

On 5/1/21 5:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/05/2021 20:12, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: The Tor Project distribute their own build of Firefox I think. Iǘe used it a few times. If one installs the torbrowser-launcher package and then runs it it will go through the process of downloading their

After latest dnfupate Firefox taking about 2:43 to load??

Running firefox with strace shows it hitting these two poll lines, where it just sits doing nothing for a long time? Actually, pauses after displaying up to the NULL,8 then it goes on until it hits the second one. First on has always been fd=10, but have seen fd=14 or fd=13 for second?? ppoll(