Re: MP3 player mounts on /run - why?

2021-07-02 Thread Geoffrey Leach
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 19:15:29 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2021-07-02 5:59 p.m., Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > The Thunar file manager mounts a MP3 player on > > /run/media/. Can anyone give me a clue as to why the > > choice? The UUID is X52, which I assume is OK, although I've never > > seen one so

Re: MP3 player mounts on /run - why?

2021-07-02 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 2021-07-02 5:59 p.m., Geoffrey Leach wrote: The Thunar file manager mounts a MP3 player on /run/media/. Can anyone give me a clue as to why the choice? The UUID is X52, which I assume is OK, although I've never seen one so short. That's the standard mount point for user mounts. The is

MP3 player mounts on /run - why?

2021-07-02 Thread Geoffrey Leach
The Thunar file manager mounts a MP3 player on /run/media/. Can anyone give me a clue as to why the choice? The UUID is X52, which I assume is OK, although I've never seen one so short. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-02 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Samuel Sieb writes: On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system, are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this already been dealt with? qemu has support for a TPM 2.0 either as a passthrough or

Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-02 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system, are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this already been dealt with? qemu has support for a TPM 2.0 either as a passthrough or an emulation. I

Re: Questions on creating RPM Package??

2021-07-02 Thread Michael D. Setzer II via users
On 2 Jul 2021 at 7:35, stan via users wrote: Date sent: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 07:35:17 -0700 To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject:Re: Questions on creating RPM Package?? Organization: zohofree Send reply to: Community support for

Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-02 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 12:30 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 18:24:03 +0200 > Walter H. via users wrote: > > > I have successfully installed Win 11 build 21996.1 as a VMware > > Guest; > > (used the ISO that was leaked several days ago) > > > > On 02.07.2021 18:02, Patrick

Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-02 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 18:24 +0200, Walter H. via users wrote: > I have successfully installed Win 11 build 21996.1 as a VMware Guest; > (used the ISO that was leaked several days ago) > > On 02.07.2021 18:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for

Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-02 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 18:24:03 +0200 Walter H. via users wrote: > I have successfully installed Win 11 build 21996.1 as a VMware Guest; > (used the ISO that was leaked several days ago) > > On 02.07.2021 18:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for

Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-02 Thread Walter H. via users
I have successfully installed Win 11 build 21996.1 as a VMware Guest; (used the ISO that was leaked several days ago) On 02.07.2021 18:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system, are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or

Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-02 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system, are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this already been dealt with? poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

[389-users] Re: Replica's nsslapd-referral uri is ldap: instead of ldap:

2021-07-02 Thread Collins, Brian (CAI - Atlanta)
One more update to this for now. But first, I want to commend the 389 team once more for all their work. My never-ending bull-headed nature kept me poking around on this. I found that I can do another ldapmodify, and in dn: cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dexample\2Cdc\3Dcom,cn=mapping tree,cn=config I can

Re: Questions on creating RPM Package??

2021-07-02 Thread stan via users
On Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:30:14 +1000 "Michael D. Setzer II via users" wrote: > Thanks for the reply. Comments below > > On 1 Jul 2021 at 18:35, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > Subject: Re: Questions on creating RPM > Package?? > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > From:

[389-users] Re: Replica's nsslapd-referral uri is ldap: instead of ldap:

2021-07-02 Thread Collins, Brian (CAI - Atlanta)
Once a backend/suffix is replicated, the replication plugin apparently controls the referrals on the backends (which makes sense). I'm not sure why we don't honor the agreement's configuration. There could be a good reason for it, but we need to look into it closer... FYI: Indeed, and in this

[389-users] Re: Replica's nsslapd-referral uri is ldap: instead of ldap:

2021-07-02 Thread Pierre Rogier
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 3:55 PM Mark Reynolds wrote: > > On 7/2/21 9:39 AM, Collins, Brian (CAI - Atlanta) wrote: > > Thanks Mark. That is now done. > > https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/4825 > > Thanks! > > > > An interesting side note here: even if I remove the reference to auth02 in

Re: System always "Resumes from hibernation" on startup

2021-07-02 Thread stan via users
On Thu, 01 Jul 2021 17:25:30 -0700 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > On Thu, 2021-07-01 at 07:26 -0700, stan via users wrote: > > On Thu, 01 Jul 2021 07:13:38 -0700 > > Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > > > > The system always tries to restore from hibernation on startup; > > > this causes about a 1-1/2

[389-users] Re: Replica's nsslapd-referral uri is ldap: instead of ldap:

2021-07-02 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 7/2/21 9:39 AM, Collins, Brian (CAI - Atlanta) wrote: Thanks Mark.  That is now done. https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/4825 Thanks! An interesting side note here: even if I remove the reference to auth02 in my fixdeferral.ldif and re-apply it, the reference to auth02

[389-users] Re: Replica's nsslapd-referral uri is ldap: instead of ldap:

2021-07-02 Thread Collins, Brian (CAI - Atlanta)
Thanks Mark. That is now done. https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/4825 An interesting side note here: even if I remove the reference to auth02 in my fixdeferral.ldif and re-apply it, the reference to auth02 returns. On a whim, I added a third nsslapd-referral and appied that. After

[389-users] Re: Replica's nsslapd-referral uri is ldap: instead of ldap:

2021-07-02 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 7/2/21 8:35 AM, Collins, Brian (CAI - Atlanta) wrote: Thanks for the quick reply, Mark. Also, thank you to you and the folks at Red Hat for all the work in the newer releases.  Two things stand out: dsconf and not having to run X.  There is much more, but those two are a great benefit.

Live on USB with another data partition

2021-07-02 Thread Petr Menšík
Hi! I am trying to make my 64GB flash drive bootable to Fedora. It is quite easy to write iso image using dd to flash drive. However, I would like to use the unused flash drive space for normal files on VFAT partition. I would like to keep booting both over legacy MBR and UEFI on the same time.

Re: Questions on creating RPM Package??

2021-07-02 Thread Michael D. Setzer II via users
Thanks for the reply. Comments below On 1 Jul 2021 at 18:35, Samuel Sieb wrote: Subject:Re: Questions on creating RPM Package?? To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org From: Samuel Sieb Date sent: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 18:35:01 -0700 Send

Re: NM, wpa_supplicant flooding error log

2021-07-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 01:50:57PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 02/07/2021 09:45, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 05:36:30AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: Well, what I would do in this case is to first do "lspci -v" and compare my hardware specs and driver in use with that reported in