Re: network mystery!!??

On 28/03/2022 11:33, Samuel Sieb wrote: Is it really just me?  I see various people responding.  Do you actually understand what his setup is?  It doesn't make any sense at all to me. It is not only you.  I haven't grasped the setup either. However, I would note that everything was working

Re: network mystery!!??

On 3/26/22 23:35, Jack Craig wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:14 PM Samuel Sieb > wrote: On 3/26/22 22:57, Jack Craig wrote: > (internet)---lan connect--- nighthawk>--lan connect-[netgear switch]-- Now we're getting somewhere.  Can you also

Very Weird Video Problem: SOLVED

I'm posting this just because it was so weird, in the hopes that maybe it helps someone somewhere down the road. Earlier today, videos embedded in web pages just stopped playing on my laptop. E.g., if I go to YouTube and click on any video at all, it won't start. Or, better, the ad won't. It

Re: network mystery!!??

On 28Mar2022 08:42, Cameron Simpson wrote: >I'm wondering if you're worrying about routing when you should be >worrying about the port forward. Just to follow up to my own post, here's a description of my home LAN: public-ip-addr NBN-modem 192.168.1.0/24 |

Re: maybe OT

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 4:47 PM Paolo Galtieri wrote: > > I'm having issues with a VM. > > The VM was originally created under VMware and has worked fine for a > while. Today when I booted it up instead of seeing the usual MATE login > screen I get a login prompt: > > f34-01-vm: > > no matter

Re: network mystery!!??

I'm wondering if you're worrying about routing when you should be worrying about the port forward. Routing: can the server ping, say, 1.1.1.1? Can other hosts at various points on your LAN? If so, your routes are just fine. Also, where are your NAT points? There has to be one on the innermost

Re: Fedora 35 swapon: /swapfile: swapon failed: Invalid argument

On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 6:36 AM Brad Bell wrote: > > I am doing algorithmic differentiation with very large tapes and my jobs > sometimes run out of memory. So the workload is producing a substantial amount of anonymous pages. It's kinda hard to tell what to do to optimize without a decent

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 2:41 AM Tim via users wrote: > Tim: > >> Your ISP may be ignoring pings, many other services in between, and > >> even your own router. > > Jack Craig: > > but why can i traceroute up to my side of the me<-->isp lan > > segment?? > > Because some of the equipment

rtkt-daemon spamming on log file

Hi Checking up my logfile with journalctl -f I noticed a flood of "rtkit-daemon[1034]: Supervising 16 threads of 13 processes of 1 users." Why is that happening? Don't know when it started but it is kind of annoying when I try to keep track of events on my desktop Is there any better way to stop

Re: pipewire and wireplumber

R. G. Newbury wrote: >> And did that version have an exception for when the sacrifice is to >> be undertaken if being undertaken *in California*? Joe Zeff: > Having spent most of my 72 years in California, I know that the most > important thing is to make sure you're using black candles. >

Re: network mystery!!??

Tim: >> Your ISP may be ignoring pings, many other services in between, and >> even your own router. Jack Craig: > but why can i traceroute up to my side of the me<-->isp lan > segment?? Because some of the equipment responds, others don't. If you look back at your first posting (repasted

Re: network mystery!!??

On 27/03/2022 15:52, Ed Greshko wrote: On 27/03/2022 15:15, Jack Craig wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:12 AM Jack Craig wrote:     On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:06 AM Ed Greshko wrote:     On 27/03/2022 15:04, Jack Craig wrote:     >     >     > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at

Re: network mystery!!??

On 27/03/2022 15:15, Jack Craig wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:12 AM Jack Craig wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:06 AM Ed Greshko wrote: On 27/03/2022 15:04, Jack Craig wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:53 PM Ed Greshko wrote: >

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:12 AM Jack Craig wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:06 AM Ed Greshko > wrote: > >> On 27/03/2022 15:04, Jack Craig wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:53 PM Ed Greshko >> wrote: >> > >> > On 27/03/2022 14:40, Jack Craig wrote: >> > > but

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:06 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 27/03/2022 15:04, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:53 PM Ed Greshko > wrote: > > > > On 27/03/2022 14:40, Jack Craig wrote: > > > but srvr is on 10.0.0.101, att rtr is between 192.168.1.254 and >

Re: network mystery!!??

On 27/03/2022 15:04, Jack Craig wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:53 PM Ed Greshko wrote: On 27/03/2022 14:40, Jack Craig wrote: > but srvr is on 10.0.0.101, att rtr is between 192.168.1.254 and 108.90.204.76. > > still make sense?? I see To test, I want you to

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:53 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 27/03/2022 14:40, Jack Craig wrote: > > but srvr is on 10.0.0.101, att rtr is between 192.168.1.254 and > 108.90.204.76. > > > > still make sense?? > > I see > > To test, I want you to make the server a static ip address of >

Re: network mystery!!??

On 27/03/2022 14:40, Jack Craig wrote: but srvr is on 10.0.0.101, att rtr is between 192.168.1.254 and 108.90.204.76. still make sense?? I see To test, I want you to make the server a static ip address of 108.220.213.121 and then connect it to the BGW210-700. It seems the BGW210-700

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:06 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 27/03/2022 13:57, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 10:20 PM Ed Greshko > wrote: > > > > On 27/03/2022 12:19, Jack Craig wrote: > > > after much wailing and gnashing of teeth, att did send a tech and > for

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:14 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 3/26/22 22:57, Jack Craig wrote: > > (internet)---lan connect--- > nighthawk>--lan connect-[netgear switch]-- > > Now we're getting somewhere. Can you also assign the following IP > addresses from your original email into that

Re: network mystery!!??

On 3/26/22 22:57, Jack Craig wrote: (internet)---lan connect---nighthawk>--lan connect-[netgear switch]-- Now we're getting somewhere. Can you also assign the following IP addresses from your original email into that diagram? 10.0.0.101ws.linuxlighthouse.com

Re: network mystery!!??

On 27/03/2022 13:57, Jack Craig wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 10:20 PM Ed Greshko wrote: On 27/03/2022 12:19, Jack Craig wrote: > after much wailing and gnashing of teeth, att did send a tech and for general internet access its fine. > just not working with my configuration...