LibreOffice Base questions

Followed the thread on libreoffice-base and noted that I did not have libreoffice-base and libreoffice-math installed. Tried manual install on F35 system sudo dnf install libreoffice-base libreoffice-math and got this strange result Error: Problem: conflicting requests  - package

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

Tom Horsley writes: On Tue, 17 May 2022 20:46:02 -0400 Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Yes, and yes. And the lock-ups occur when the system is idle overnight and > does absolutely nothing whatsoever. That's the sort of thing that would make me want to run "journalctl -l -f" on an xterm remotely

openvpn vs F36

After updating F35->F36 my openvpn client is no longer connecting. I did look at https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/openssl-error-when-connecting-to-vpn-via-networkmanager-fedora-36/21123 And followed the last response

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On Tue, 17 May 2022 20:46:02 -0400 Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Yes, and yes. And the lock-ups occur when the system is idle overnight and > does absolutely nothing whatsoever. That's the sort of thing that would make me want to run "journalctl -l -f" on an xterm remotely connected from another

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

Thomas Dineen writes: « HTML content follows » Gentlemen: Its not just the heat sink, consider also the heat sink fan? is it big enough? That thing is a monster. is it working properly, at full Speed? Also do you have case fans? Again working properly? Yes, and yes. And the lock-ups

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

Gentlemen: Its not just the heat sink, consider also the heat sink fan? is it big enough? is it working properly, at full Speed? Also do you have case fans? Again working properly? Is the heat sink clogged with dirt and dust? Remember spring is here and were getting warmer days. This could

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On 5/17/22 17:12, Sam Varshavchik wrote: ToddAndMargo via users writes: On 5/17/22 04:57, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Plus the monster heat sink I strapped on the 16 core CPU Not to ask too stupid a question, but did you remember the thermal grease?  xsensors will tell you. Not only did I

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

ToddAndMargo via users writes: On 5/17/22 04:57, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Plus the monster heat sink I strapped on the 16 core CPU Not to ask too stupid a question, but did you remember the thermal grease? xsensors will tell you. Not only did I remember it, but when ordering all the parts

Re: Fedora 36: NetworkManager dispatcher: SELinux avc denied after update

Il giorno mar, 17/05/2022 alle 19.42 +0200, Zdenek Pytela ha scritto: > If the /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/15-vpn-disp file is not a > part of any package, the following command should set the correct > label: > >   # restorecon -v /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/15-vpn-disp > > but that

Re: Fedora 36 ViurtualBox needs libvpx.so.6

My 35 system says this package, has the so.6 in it: libvpx-1.10.0-2.fc35.x86_64 On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 4:25 PM Terry Polzin wrote: > sudo dnf install libvpx.so.6 > Last metadata expiration check: 1:34:35 ago on Tue 17 May 2022 03:47:01 PM > EDT. > No match for argument: libvpx.so.6 > Error:

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On 5/17/22 06:02, stan via users wrote: SSH into the system to see if it responds? I can run Thunar and geany and a few other simple interface programs over teh Intrnet to customer's sites wi6th SSH and X11. Here is a sample thunar run line: thunar

Re: Fedora 36 ViurtualBox needs libvpx.so.6

sudo dnf install libvpx.so.6 Last metadata expiration check: 1:34:35 ago on Tue 17 May 2022 03:47:01 PM EDT. No match for argument: libvpx.so.6 Error: Unable to find a match: libvpx.so.6 On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 5:21 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/17/22 13:51, Joe Zeff wrote: > > On 5/17/22 12:57,

Re: Fedora 36 ViurtualBox needs libvpx.so.6

On 5/17/22 13:51, Joe Zeff wrote: On 5/17/22 12:57, Terry Polzin wrote: sudo dnf install /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:18 ago on Tue 17 May 2022 02:56:57 PM EDT. No match for argument: /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 Error: Unable to find a match: /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On 5/17/22 05:41, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I swapped the CPU, and I have nothing to do but fiddle my thumbs for the next two weeks. My experience with such a test is that it will be the one time when it takes three times as long to reproduce and I jump to conclusions thinking I have found the

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On 5/17/22 04:57, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Plus the monster heat sink I strapped on the 16 core CPU Not to ask too stupid a question, but did you remember the thermal grease? xsensors will tell you. ___ users mailing list --

Re: Fedora 36 ViurtualBox needs libvpx.so.6

On 5/17/22 12:57, Terry Polzin wrote: sudo dnf install /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:18 ago on Tue 17 May 2022 02:56:57 PM EDT. No match for argument: /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 Error: Unable to find a match: /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 Try it again without the path.

Re: Fedora 36 ViurtualBox needs libvpx.so.6

On 5/17/22 12:26, Terry Polzin wrote: Who said I was a Gnome user?  I'm an XFCE user. On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 3:16 PM Samuel Sieb > wrote: On 5/17/22 11:57, Terry Polzin wrote: > sudo dnf install /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 > Last metadata expiration check:

Re: Fedora 36 ViurtualBox needs libvpx.so.6

Who said I was a Gnome user? I'm an XFCE user. On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 3:16 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/17/22 11:57, Terry Polzin wrote: > > sudo dnf install /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:18 ago on Tue 17 May 2022 02:56:57 > > PM EDT. > > No match for

Re: Fedora 36 ViurtualBox needs libvpx.so.6

On 5/17/22 11:57, Terry Polzin wrote: sudo dnf install /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:18 ago on Tue 17 May 2022 02:56:57 PM EDT. No match for argument: /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 Error: Unable to find a match: /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 Right, the 1.11 version in F36 is

Re: Fedora 36 ViurtualBox needs libvpx.so.6

sudo dnf install /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:18 ago on Tue 17 May 2022 02:56:57 PM EDT. No match for argument: /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 Error: Unable to find a match: /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 2:54 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/17/22 11:08,

Re: Fedora 36 ViurtualBox needs libvpx.so.6

On 5/17/22 11:08, Terry Polzin wrote: So where does this library come from?  It would appear that earlier versions of VirtualBox used libvpx.so.5 which was part of compat-libvpx5,  there doesn't seem to be a compat-libvpx6 package # rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.6 libvpx-1.10.0-2.fc35.x86_64

Re: How does one request a new RPM package group?

> On May 17, 2022, at 10:20 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 12:36 PM Scott Beamer > wrote: >> >> Thanks. Should I file an issue in both places? > > I'd take it to the KDE SIG. They can make the necessary comps changes. > Great. Thank you.

Fedora 36 ViurtualBox needs libvpx.so.6

So where does this library come from? It would appear that earlier versions of VirtualBox used libvpx.so.5 which was part of compat-libvpx5, there doesn't seem to be a compat-libvpx6 package ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Fedora 36: NetworkManager dispatcher: SELinux avc denied after update

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 1:07 PM Dario Lesca wrote: > After update to Fedora 36 I have a selinux problem with my personal > NetworkManager dispatcher script > > Into logs I get this error: > > mag 17 12:56:30 dodo.home.solinos.it audit[160270]: AVC avc: denied { > getattr } for pid=160270

Re: How does one request a new RPM package group?

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 12:36 PM Scott Beamer wrote: > > Thanks. Should I file an issue in both places? I'd take it to the KDE SIG. They can make the necessary comps changes. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis

Re: How does one request a new RPM package group?

On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 09:35 -0700, Scott Beamer wrote: > > On 5/17/22 8:08 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:01 AM Scott Beamer > > wrote: > > > I'd like to see an RPM package group added that would include all > > > the > > > KDE-specific games.  Something like the way the

Re: How does one request a new RPM package group?

On 5/17/22 8:08 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:01 AM Scott Beamer wrote: I'd like to see an RPM package group added that would include all the KDE-specific games. Something like the way the Debian/Ubuntu "kdegames" packages depends on all the official KDE games. They're

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 10:03 AM stan via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2022 07:46:09 -0400 > Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > > And I had something like this happen when a power supply was going > flaky. The voltages had drifted out of spec as it decayed. > I too

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

setup crashdumps. there is a wiki someplace for how to set them up and how to test that crashdumps are working right. And leave the screen on the text console, you may get a kernel dump. If you get a kernel dump and/or kernel message on the screen odds are it is a software issue. Usually on a

Re: How does one request a new RPM package group?

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:01 AM Scott Beamer wrote: > > I'd like to see an RPM package group added that would include all the > KDE-specific games. Something like the way the Debian/Ubuntu "kdegames" > packages depends on all the official KDE games. > > They're not included with either of the

How does one request a new RPM package group?

Greetings, I'd like to see an RPM package group added that would include all the KDE-specific games.  Something like the way the Debian/Ubuntu "kdegames" packages depends on all the official KDE games. They're not included with either of the current KDE package groups and it's a pain to 

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On Tue, 17 May 2022 07:46:09 -0400 Sam Varshavchik wrote: > No, everything's frozen, no response. It usually hangs overnight, > with the monitor sleeping. No response from the keyboard, no pings > from the network. The only thing to do is to hit reset and reboot. > > Nothing gets logged in

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

ToddAndMargo via users writes: HAve yo tried turning off all teh "sleep" and "suspend" features and set everything to always on. Also, do you have a UPS power supply? Is your VCR blinking? Yes, the whole thing's on a UPS. I adjusted all the appropriate sleep and suspend settings. Its

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 8:02 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote: > It's been a long time since I've encountered this kind of obtuseness. > This > is not new, but I thought that this kind of blindness was in the > rear-view > mirror. I guess not. > > One of their motherboards keeps locking up on me. After

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On 5/17/22 04:57, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Is your case closed when this happens?  Open cases do not cool properly. I have plenty of cooling on this thing, five 120mm fans. Two came with the case, it had space for four more, and I shoved three more in. I had to get 1:3 fan power multipliers,

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On 5/17/22 04:46, Sam Varshavchik wrote: ToddAndMargo via users writes: On 5/17/22 03:13, Sam Varshavchik wrote: ToddAndMargo via users writes: Are all your fans working?  Frozen fans on video cards are a YUGE cause of freeze ups. It's a brand new Radeon 7750 card. I have not closely

Re: Problems with Borg backup on F36

On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 13:11 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote: > 17.05.22, 11:48 +0200, Patrick O'Callaghan: > > > On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 16:08 -0600, James Szinger wrote: > > > > Also, my systems are using borgbackup-1.1.17-1.fc35 and > > > borgbackup-1.2.0-1.fc36.  How did you get 1.2.0 on F35? >

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

ToddAndMargo via users writes: On 5/17/22 03:13, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I keep the system doing nothing, and it freezes up randomly every 3-10 days. On Windows machines, if fans are frozen and not cooling properly, you turn your back to them for a bit, then turn back, touch the keyboard,

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

ToddAndMargo via users writes: On 5/17/22 03:13, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Ryzen 3950X CPU I have found that AMD processors' only reason for existence is to keep Intel's prices down. It is not that AMD can't make a good CPU, it is because they are expected to be cheaper and so everything else

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

ToddAndMargo via users writes: On 5/17/22 03:13, Sam Varshavchik wrote: ToddAndMargo via users writes: Are all your fans working?  Frozen fans on video cards are a YUGE cause of freeze ups. It's a brand new Radeon 7750 card. I have not closely inspected its tiny fan, but everything's

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On 5/17/22 03:13, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I keep the system doing nothing, and it freezes up randomly every 3-10 days. On Windows machines, if fans are frozen and not cooling properly, you turn your back to them for a bit, then turn back, touch the keyboard, and they freeze up. Gives the user

Re: Problems with Borg backup on F36

17.05.22, 11:48 +0200, Patrick O'Callaghan: On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 16:08 -0600, James Szinger wrote: Also, my systems are using borgbackup-1.1.17-1.fc35 and borgbackup-1.2.0-1.fc36.  How did you get 1.2.0 on F35? I simply updated with dnf and there it was. Didn´t do anything special. 1.1x

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On 5/17/22 03:13, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Ryzen 3950X CPU I have found that AMD processors' only reason for existence is to keep Intel's prices down. It is not that AMD can't make a good CPU, it is because they are expected to be cheaper and so everything else that goes with them is also

Fedora 36: NetworkManager dispatcher: SELinux avc denied after update

After update to Fedora 36 I have a selinux problem with my personal NetworkManager dispatcher script Into logs I get this error: mag 17 12:56:30 dodo.home.solinos.it audit[160270]: AVC avc: denied { getattr } for pid=160270 comm="nm-dispatcher"

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

On 5/17/22 03:13, Sam Varshavchik wrote: ToddAndMargo via users writes: Are all your fans working?  Frozen fans on video cards are a YUGE cause of freeze ups. It's a brand new Radeon 7750 card. I have not closely inspected its tiny fan, but everything's quiet on that front. The system hangs

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

Hi I used to build workstations and servers for the Computacenter in St Albans England. 200 machines a night. I've just had a long session with a Gigabyte board and an NVIDIA card. A GK107GL Quadro K600 card which refused to work with anything. I tried Debian 11. Linux Mint. Arch Linux and

Re: Gigabyte: "we cannot offer full support on Linux"

ToddAndMargo via users writes: Are all your fans working? Frozen fans on video cards are a YUGE cause of freeze ups. It's a brand new Radeon 7750 card. I have not closely inspected its tiny fan, but everything's quiet on that front. The system hangs when it's idle, pretty much overnight.

Re: nvidia driver disabled ion F36 upgrade?

On 15/05/2022 15:21, Barry wrote: On 14 May 2022, at 09:15, Barry Scott wrote: I have been using the nvidia driver from rpmfusion on f35 without problem. Just upgraded to F36 and its using nouveau. There is a nvidia-fallback service that ran and did the modprobe nouveau. (Nice that this

Re: Problems with Borg backup on F36

On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 16:08 -0600, James Szinger wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2022 20:56:10 +0100 > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 18:20 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote: > > > 16.05.22, 17:45 +0200, Patrick O'Callaghan: > > >   > > > > I updated to F36 a few days ago and

Re: fractional scaling in Fedora 36

On 5/14/22 04:03, Tim via users wrote: On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 08:47 -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote: My questions: 1. Is there another way to enable fractional scaling? (Gnome and Wayland) In my opinion scaling is a bad hack to avoid properly sizing a GUI to the current screen resolution and

Re: BDFDoor virus

On 5/17/22 01:31, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 5/17/22 01:14, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/17/22 01:04, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/bpfdoor-stealthy-linux-malware-bypasses-firewalls-for-remote-access/ Any comments? SELinux tag this guy? Do

Re: BDFDoor virus

On 5/17/22 01:14, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/17/22 01:04, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/bpfdoor-stealthy-linux-malware-bypasses-firewalls-for-remote-access/ Any comments? SELinux tag this guy? Do you have to be tricked to installing the daemon?

Re: BDFDoor virus

On 5/17/22 01:15, Luna Jernberg wrote: Will be patched upstream in the new kernels coming tommorow Patched how? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: BDFDoor virus

Will be patched upstream in the new kernels coming tommorow On 5/17/22, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/17/22 01:04, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/bpfdoor-stealthy-linux-malware-bypasses-firewalls-for-remote-access/ >> >> >> >> Any comments? >> >>

Re: BDFDoor virus

On 5/17/22 01:04, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/bpfdoor-stealthy-linux-malware-bypasses-firewalls-for-remote-access/ Any comments? SELinux tag this guy? Do you have to be tricked to installing the daemon? Or can it just come up the wire at you?

BDFDoor virus

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/bpfdoor-stealthy-linux-malware-bypasses-firewalls-for-remote-access/ Any comments? SELinux tag this guy? Do you have to be tricked to installing the daemon? Or can it just come up the wire at you? ___