On 12/27/2022 10:20 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
It doesn't. There might be a tag you could add to get systemd to
automount it, but I don't know off-hand. Or I think there's an
automount system that you can setup to mount it when you access the
directory.
Try adding auto to the options. HTH
On 12/27/22 17:44, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 17:39:06 -0800
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Almost surely true. I had exactly the same problem with a USB mounted
hard drive. I put an entry for it into /etc/fstab and have had no
problems..
$ cat /etc/fstab
...
LABEL=Rosewill
I am looking at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThinkPad_X_series
And it seems the x140e is the last of thinkpads worth getting?
the X250 maybe, but the X260 looses the vga so I would need an adapter
from HDMI. Also I have lots of x140e power supplies and I would have to
get extra ones for
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 17:39:06 -0800
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Almost surely true. I had exactly the same problem with a USB mounted
> hard drive. I put an entry for it into /etc/fstab and have had no
> problems..
>
> $ cat /etc/fstab
> ...
> LABEL=Rosewill /srv/Rosewill/ ext4 nofail,defaults
>
> It looks like if you add it to /etc/fstab, then Gnome auto-mounting
> won't touch it.
Confirmed! Works like a charm, thank you very much!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, 2022-12-27 at 13:53 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 12/27/22 13:35, Amadeus WM via users wrote:
> >
> > > You could check the "don't prompt or run programs" checkbox, but
> > > that
> > > will apply to all devices. You might be able to create a udev
> > > rule to
> > > isolate that
On 12/27/2022 6:39 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/27/22 14:59, Bill Cunningham wrote:
On 12/27/2022 5:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/27/22 14:15, Bill Cunningham wrote:
I have found directories in /usr that are named after
architectures. So something has changed; is it ok to delete these?
On 12/27/22 14:59, Bill Cunningham wrote:
On 12/27/2022 5:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/27/22 14:15, Bill Cunningham wrote:
I have found directories in /usr that are named after architectures.
So something has changed; is it ok to delete these? One is "x86_64",
something and one is another
On Tue, 2022-12-27 at 18:00 -0500, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>
> On 12/27/2022 5:56 PM, Barry wrote:
> >
> > > On 27 Dec 2022, at 22:15, Bill Cunningham
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > I have found directories in /usr that are named after
> > > architectures. So something has changed; is it ok to
On 12/27/2022 6:00 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote:
On 12/27/2022 5:56 PM, Barry wrote:
On 27 Dec 2022, at 22:15, Bill Cunningham
wrote:
I have found directories in /usr that are named after
architectures. So something has changed; is it ok to delete these?
One is "x86_64", something and
On 12/27/2022 5:56 PM, Barry wrote:
On 27 Dec 2022, at 22:15, Bill Cunningham wrote:
I have found directories in /usr that are named after architectures. So something has
changed; is it ok to delete these? One is "x86_64", something and one is
another architecture. Are these for the
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 14:31:16 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> If they are installed by the package manager, you shouldn't be deleting
> them.
> Do you mean "x86_64-w64-mingw32" and "i686-w64-mingw32"?
> Did you install wine?
Those files and directories are related to mingw not wine.
And there are
On 12/27/2022 5:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/27/22 14:15, Bill Cunningham wrote:
I have found directories in /usr that are named after architectures.
So something has changed; is it ok to delete these? One is "x86_64",
something and one is another architecture. Are these for the system
> On 27 Dec 2022, at 22:15, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>
> I have found directories in /usr that are named after architectures. So
> something has changed; is it ok to delete these? One is "x86_64", something
> and one is another architecture. Are these for the system installing? They
> were
On 12/27/22 14:15, Bill Cunningham wrote:
I have found directories in /usr that are named after architectures. So
something has changed; is it ok to delete these? One is "x86_64",
something and one is another architecture. Are these for the system
installing? They were not in f36.
If they
I have found directories in /usr that are named after architectures. So
something has changed; is it ok to delete these? One is "x86_64",
something and one is another architecture. Are these for the system
installing? They were not in f36.
B
___
On 12/27/22 13:35, Amadeus WM via users wrote:
You could check the "don't prompt or run programs" checkbox, but that
will apply to all devices. You might be able to create a udev rule to
isolate that specific device.
That's right, and I didn't mention this in the original post. I would only
Time to install Fedora37 and on what?
I have a Lenovo x140e upgraded with 16Gb mem (even though spec says 8Gb
max) and 500GB SSD, but I am looking for something perhaps newer and
perhaps won't hang at times.
Requirements are:
12" format
eraserhead pointing device (I hate touchpads!)
VGA
> You could check the "don't prompt or run programs" checkbox, but that
> will apply to all devices. You might be able to create a udev rule to
> isolate that specific device.
That's right, and I didn't mention this in the original post. I would only
want to not mount that one specific drive.
On 12/27/22 12:29, Amadeus WM via users wrote:
I have a USB drive that I use for backup and in gnome (42.4) it gets
automatically mounted on /run/media//. However, I want to
export that as an NFS drive. Obviously this means that the drive be
mounted under a directory independent of the user, and
I have a USB drive that I use for backup and in gnome (42.4) it gets
automatically mounted on /run/media//. However, I want to
export that as an NFS drive. Obviously this means that the drive be
mounted under a directory independent of the user, and whether or not the
user has started a gnome
21 matches
Mail list logo
