On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 09:08:44AM -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
I'm reading articles saying procmail is dangerous and unmaintained
(https://anarc.at/blog/2022-03-02-procmail-considered-harmful/).
Quote from the page above - seems to be old and, to put it mildly,
wrong:
"procmail is unmaintained
On 1/26/24 14:39, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/26/24 09:07, Jon Ingason via users wrote:
Did following:
$ dnf search procmail
Fedora 39 - x86_64 9.3 MB/s | 89 MB
= Namn Exakt matchad: procmail
procmail.x86_64 : Mail processing program
=
On 1/26/24 09:07, Jon Ingason via users wrote:
Did following:
$ dnf search procmail
Fedora 39 - x86_64 9.3 MB/s | 89 MB
= Namn Exakt matchad: procmail
procmail.x86_64 : Mail processing program
=== Namn & Sammanfattning M
Den 2024-01-26 kl. 17:26, skrev Thomas Cameron:
On 1/26/24 10:10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I used procmail for years and never had an issue with it. However I
don't like unmaintained software so removed it when support was
dropped. The problem with Sieve (and several other options) is that
the
On 1/26/24 10:10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I used procmail for years and never had an issue with it. However I
don't like unmaintained software so removed it when support was
dropped. The problem with Sieve (and several other options) is that
they're server-side, so if your server doesn't suppo
On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 09:08 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> I'm reading articles saying procmail is dangerous and unmaintained
> (https://anarc.at/blog/2022-03-02-procmail-considered-harmful/).
>
> I get why a setuid root:mail binary is potentially dangerous, but
> procmail has been in use for de
I'm reading articles saying procmail is dangerous and unmaintained
(https://anarc.at/blog/2022-03-02-procmail-considered-harmful/).
I get why a setuid root:mail binary is potentially dangerous, but
procmail has been in use for decades and I don't think I've ever heard
of it being used for an e
