On 6/29/24 6:36 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
My /boot partition is 512MB, which in F39 was more than ample for 5
kernels and a rescue image, but in F40 that partition is now to small
for a new rescue image to be created when a new kernel is installed. The
rescue image in F40 seems to be
Hi,
My /boot partition is 512MB, which in F39 was more than ample for 5
kernels and a rescue image, but in F40 that partition is now to small
for a new rescue image to be created when a new kernel is installed. The
rescue image in F40 seems to be around 102MB in size which is more that
dou
On 6/29/24 8:34 AM, Tim via users wrote:
I'd like to know why this:
dnf remove gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.20.3-1.fc36.x86_64 gstreamer1-
plugins-bad-free-extras-1.20.3-1.fc36.x86_64 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-
freeworld-1.20.3-1.fc36.x86_64
Wants to do all of this (quoted below), it's a virtual
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 1:02 PM Frédéric wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I created a USB stick with a live version of Fedora 40. I tried both
> the default version and the KDE Spin. I tried using dd and using
> mediawriter. Same result: I cannot boot on the USB drive if my BIOS is
> configured in UEFI as it is
Hi,
I created a USB stick with a live version of Fedora 40. I tried both
the default version and the KDE Spin. I tried using dd and using
mediawriter. Same result: I cannot boot on the USB drive if my BIOS is
configured in UEFI as it is to boot from my hard disk on Fedora 38. It
says that there is
Beartooth composed on 2024-06-29 14:51 (UTC):
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:44:01 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Renaming ~/.mozilla/seamonkey is a sledgehammer. SeaMonkey has a
>> -profilemanager switch same as Firefox, for adding, deleting & modifying
>> profiles, including moving them to a more conve
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 01:04:47 +0930
Tim via users wrote:
> As to why I want to remove them, I'm trying to narrow down why playing
> some video files *sometimes* crash my system hard.
Instead of trying to do thing the "right" way with dnf, you could just
move the codec files to a different director
> On 29 Jun 2024, at 03:18, Ryan Bach via users
> wrote:
>
> https://community.clearlinux.org/t/apx-and-avx10-compiled-binaries-coming-to-clear-linux-this-week/9421
>
> Does Fedora 41 have x86-64-1-4 optimized rpms to select from?
There are two parts to this. The first is that all Fedora RPM
I'd like to know why this:
dnf remove gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.20.3-1.fc36.x86_64 gstreamer1-
plugins-bad-free-extras-1.20.3-1.fc36.x86_64 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-
freeworld-1.20.3-1.fc36.x86_64
Wants to do all of this (quoted below), it's a virtual system destruct
for the want of removing so
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:44:01 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Beartooth composed on 2024-06-28 15:51 (UTC):
>
>>> Beartooth wrote:
>
Seamonkey under the last several releases of Fedora Linux does not
display pix. It says, inter alia, "Error: could not load." It also
gives me a link
On Sat, 2024-06-29 at 02:18 +, Ryan Bach via users wrote:
> https://community.clearlinux.org/t/apx-and-avx10-compiled-binaries-coming-to-clear-linux-this-week/9421
>
> Does Fedora 41 have x86-64-1-4 optimized rpms to select from?
The current release of Fedora is 40. Questions regarding the fu
11 matches
Mail list logo
