Re: nmcli and system-connections

On 7/3/24 7:02 PM, Alex wrote: > However, I also have virtual interfaces on eth1:1 and others. What are the next steps? Interface aliases are pretty much deprecated (see the thread about ifconfig), you’d just assign multiple IPs/prefixes to eth1. I do see

Re: nmcli and system-connections

> > >> > However, I also have virtual interfaces on eth1:1 and others. What are >> the next steps? >> >> Interface aliases are pretty much deprecated (see the thread about >> ifconfig), you’d just assign multiple IPs/prefixes to eth1. > > > I do see that now, after another few hours trying to make

Re: nmcli and system-connections

> > > > > However, I also have virtual interfaces on eth1:1 and others. What are > the next steps? > > Interface aliases are pretty much deprecated (see the thread about > ifconfig), you’d just assign multiple IPs/prefixes to eth1. I do see that now, after another few hours trying to make this

Re: Local, system e-mails only delivered on reboot--SOLVED

On 7/3/24 5:52 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:45:30 -0400 Tim Evans wrote: Se, we find where the bogus domain name comes from. AND, changing it to my actual domain name, then running the sendmail queue clears everything out of the queue. But will the network software put back

Re: Local, system e-mails only delivered on reboot--SOLVED

On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:47 PM Tim Evans wrote: > > On 7/3/24 4:10 PM, Tim via users wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 10:04 -0400, Tim Evans wrote: > >> Jul 03 09:45:07 kestrel sendmail[1526]: 45T7V2ou003307: > >> to=, delay=4+06:14:04, xdelay=00:00:00, > >> mailer=esmtp, pri=9500566,

Re: Local, system e-mails only delivered on reboot--SOLVED

On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:45:30 -0400 Tim Evans wrote: > Se, we find where the bogus domain name comes from. AND, changing it to > my actual domain name, then running the sendmail queue clears everything > out of the queue. But will the network software put back the bogus resolv.conf behind your

Re: nmcli and system-connections

On Jul 3, 2024, at 12:15, Alex wrote: > However, I also have virtual interfaces on eth1:1 and others. What are the > next steps? Interface aliases are pretty much deprecated (see the thread about ifconfig), you’d just assign multiple IPs/prefixes to eth1. -- Jonathan Billings --

Re: Local, system e-mails only delivered on reboot--SOLVED

On 7/3/24 4:10 PM, Tim via users wrote: On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 10:04 -0400, Tim Evans wrote: Jul 03 09:45:07 kestrel sendmail[1526]: 45T7V2ou003307: to=, delay=4+06:14:04, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=9500566, relay=kestrel.mynetworksettings.com., dsn=4.4.1, stat=Deferred: Connection

Re: Local, system e-mails only delivered on reboot

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 10:04 -0400, Tim Evans wrote: > Jul 03 09:45:07 kestrel sendmail[1526]: 45T7V2ou003307: > to=, delay=4+06:14:04, xdelay=00:00:00, > mailer=esmtp, pri=9500566, relay=kestrel.mynetworksettings.com., > dsn=4.4.1, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by >

Re: Local, system e-mails only delivered on reboot

On 7/3/24 11:25 AM, George N. White III wrote: On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 12:16 PM George N. White III > wrote: On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:43 AM Tom Horsley mailto:horsley1...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:04:30 -0400 Tim Evans wrote:

Re: install fedora 40 raid1+lvm

> Am 03.07.2024 um 18:34 schrieb François Patte > : > > Bonjour, > > Where can I find some details on the installation of fedora 40, I would like > to have raid1 arrays and lvm. For Fedora server you may have a look at: https://pboy.fedorapeople.org/InstGuideF33-Hetzner-en.pdf Not really

livecd-iso-to-disk with data-persistence

Hi folks, on a Fedora 40 XFCE I'm running livecd-iso-to-disk to create a bootable stick with persistent home and persistent overlay. In the direcotry where I downloaded Fedora-Xfce-Live-x86_64-40-1.14.iso I run the following command:     sudo livecd-iso-to-disk --efi --format --reset-mbr

Re: remove a disk from raid1 array

You need to add this to the grub kernel boot line: bootdegraded=true otherwise the default behavior is to freak out and not work. On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 5:17 AM François Patte wrote: > > Bonjour, > > I need to remove a disk from a raid1 array and restart the computer > *without* that disk and

Re: Local, system e-mails only delivered on reboot

On 7/3/24 07:21, Tom Horsley wrote: ...sendmail is utterly cryptic, I still have nightmares about the Bat book. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

install fedora 40 raid1+lvm

Bonjour, Where can I find some details on the installation of fedora 40, I would like to have raid1 arrays and lvm. Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06

[389-users] Re: Enable SSHA hashing scheme

On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:48 PM Ralf Spenneberg wrote: > Actually I just upgrade the system from centos7 to almalinux9 using > elevate. Essentially this is similar to a copy of the /etc/dirsrv and > /var/lib/dirsrv directories and started the new ldapserver. > We don't support or test in-place

Re: [F40] Cannot boot live version from USB drive with UEFI BIOS

> Are you using windows to create the usb stick? No, I created them from F38 with either dd or mediawriter. > Was the f36 image a lot smaller then all the newer versions? I do not remember but I think they were all more than 2Mb. I've now solved the issue by installing F36, then upgrading to

nmcli and system-connections

Hi, I've just upgraded a fedora39 server to fedora40 and my network stopped working because I was still using the legacy network-scripts ifcfg format. I've gone through the migration using nmcli but not all connections were migrated properly and no files were written to

[389-users] Re: [EXT] Re: Replication weirdness with 3.0.1 mdb instance

No, I'm not seeing any error messages on the supplier. On both sides it seems like everything is OK, it just doesn't fully replicate the database. Tim Darby From: Pierre Rogier Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2024 7:22 AM To: General discussion list for the 389

Re: Local, system e-mails only delivered on reboot

On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 12:16 PM George N. White III wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:43 AM Tom Horsley wrote: > >> On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:04:30 -0400 >> Tim Evans wrote: >> >> > Suggestions for further digging? Thanks. >> >> Probably not really helpful, but sendmail is utterly cryptic, I

Re: Local, system e-mails only delivered on reboot

On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:43 AM Tom Horsley wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:04:30 -0400 > Tim Evans wrote: > > > Suggestions for further digging? Thanks. > > Probably not really helpful, but sendmail is utterly cryptic, I started > using postfix years ago because it was easier to configure. > I

[389-users] Re: Replication weirdness with 3.0.1 mdb instance

Hi, I suspect it may be a bug that we are just discovering: Have you checked the error on the supplier you are initializing from ? Are you seeing something like: [03/Jul/2024:16:07:57.719471684 +0200] - ERR - check_suffix_entryID - Unable to retrieve entryid of the suffix entry dc=example,dc=com

Re: Local, system e-mails only delivered on reboot

On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:04:30 -0400 Tim Evans wrote: > Suggestions for further digging? Thanks. Probably not really helpful, but sendmail is utterly cryptic, I started using postfix years ago because it was easier to configure. Maybe run as root: fgrep -R mynetworksettings /etc to see if it

Local, system e-mails only delivered on reboot

[I posted a similar question a couple of months back, but mistakenly thought I had resolved the issue] One of my F40 systems fails to deliver local, system-generated e-mails (logfiles and such) UNTIL it gets rebooted. sendmail-8.18.1-1.fc40.x86_64 is installed for local e-mail handling. On

[389-users] Re: Enable SSHA hashing scheme

Ralf Spenneberg wrote: > Actually I just upgrade the system from centos7 to almalinux9 using > elevate. Essentially this is similar to a copy of the /etc/dirsrv and > /var/lib/dirsrv directories and started the new ldapserver.  > Directly afterwards I was not able to login using the cn=Directory >

[389-users] Re: Enable SSHA hashing scheme

Actually I just upgrade the system from centos7 to almalinux9 using elevate. Essentially this is similar to a copy of the /etc/dirsrv and /var/lib/dirsrv directories and started the new ldapserver. Directly afterwards I was not able to login using the cn=Directory Manager. I checked the hashed

Re: Hypothetical boot question

> On Jul 2, 2024, at 19:31, Mike Wright wrote: > > On 7/2/24 07:44, Frank Bures wrote: >> Hi, >> I was wondering if it was possible to boot the existing F40 installation >> from a USB. I tried to research this but everything I was able to find >> dealt with booting a live image of F40 from

remove a disk from raid1 array

Bonjour, I need to remove a disk from a raid1 array and restart the computer *without* that disk and without any other disk Up to now, if I stop the computer, unplug the disk and restart, the computer does not start complaining that it has not find all the disks. Do I have to remove

[389-users] Re: Enable SSHA hashing scheme

Hi Ralf, On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 2:29 PM Ralf Spenneberg wrote: > Hi there, > I am trying to update a ldap tree from 389ds 1.3.11 (centos7) to 2.4.5 > (almalinux9). After migrating the tree all passwords stop working including > the Directory Manager. The old tree used SSHA. Setting the >

physicalfitt

I am nikewell a PR consultant at physicalfitt With over 6 years of experience in the PR and digital industry, I specialize in helping teams achieve their goals by streamlining processes and implementing effective strategies https://www.physicalfitt.com/ --

[389-users] Re: Enable SSHA hashing scheme

Hi William, I know that. But it would be great if for migration purposes the old hashes would work. I do not know the passwords of all users in the existing tree. What I would like to use afterwards is the nsslapd-enable-upgrade-hash: on feature. So, is there a possibility to support SSHA