On Tuesday 24 November 2015 02:27:58 Tim wrote:
> Tim:
> >> If I install two or more different desktops, which display manager
> >> should it enable by default, then? Does it ask you that question?
>
> Allegedly, on or about 23 November 2015, Paul Cartwright sent:
> > I switched from GDM to light
On Tuesday 24 November 2015 00:07:00 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 19:23 +, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> > I must be missing the point here, but I have always found that after
> > installing multiple desktops and leaving gdm as the login manager,
> &
On Wednesday 25 November 2015 13:57:49 Timothy Murphy wrote:
> imjournal: fscanf on state file `/var/lib/rsyslog/imjournal.state' failed
A quick google gives something that may be relevent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095784
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Saturday 16 Jan 2016 02:19:59 Tim wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 10:34 +, Christopher Ross wrote:
> > # rpm -qi fedora-release
>
> Occasionally, even *that* package gets updated, so it's not an indicator
> of install time. Unless someone else knows of something intended to show
> you the i
On Saturday 16 Jan 2016 02:19:59 Tim wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 10:34 +, Christopher Ross wrote:
> > # rpm -qi fedora-release
>
> Occasionally, even *that* package gets updated, so it's not an indicator
> of install time. Unless someone else knows of something intended to show
> you the i
On Monday 25 Jan 2016 19:06:11 Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
> LOL!!!
>
> I feel you bruce :)
>
> I think a LOT of people are struggling (and frustrated, rightfully so) with
> SELinux and simply place it in permissive mode. There is nothing wrong with
> doing this. Don't buy into the fear mongering hype.
On Monday 25 Jan 2016 19:06:11 Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
> LOL!!!
>
> I feel you bruce :)
>
> I think a LOT of people are struggling (and frustrated, rightfully so) with
> SELinux and simply place it in permissive mode. There is nothing wrong with
> doing this. Don't buy into the fear mongering hype.
On Friday 19 Feb 2016 06:41:04 Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 17 February 2016, g sent:
> > gone are the 'good old days' of boxes 4 and 5 5" drive bays where one
> > could install install 3" drives in removable drive carriers and swap
> > drives.
>
> Yet computer cases are still ridiculously
On Thursday 10 Mar 2016 13:31:36 stan wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:08:00 +
>
> Jonathan Allen wrote:
> > I agree - the print job never seems to leave the laptop. There is
> > nothing that I can see in the server logs that shows an access or
> > attempt to access the printers apart from th
Try man 1 intro
man 2 intro
man 3 intro
man 7 intro
man 8 intro
Regards
Andy
On Tuesday 23 December 2014 08:52:42 Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 12/23/2014 08:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > FWIW, "man man" does tell one the purpose of each of the sections.
>
>1 Executable programs or s
On Monday 12 January 2015 19:25:45 Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know the process number of an application that actually is
> running (Netbeans in my case), with the purpose to kill it (when is froze).
>
> But am am not able to know this process number..
>
> - In the window
On Friday 16 January 2015 16:31:03 Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/15/2015 11:28 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> > Selinux requires at least basic knowledge and administration. Most of
> > the people I installed Linux for didn't even know it was there or what
> > it's good for.
>
> If you do not use file s
Hi,
I am running fedora 20 X86_64
I have an Intel Processor:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6700 @ 2.66GHz.
I have an AMD radeon based GPU card :
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] RV535 [Radeon X1650 PRO] (Secondary)
(rev 9e)
I have two monitors :
ACER Technolgies – on DVI-0 (1920x1080)
Views
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 14:31:32 poma wrote:
> On 20.01.2015 12:52, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am running fedora 20 X86_64
> >
> > I have an Intel Processor:
> > Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6700 @ 2.66GHz.
> >
> > I have an AMD radeo
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 15:10:15 poma wrote:
> On 20.01.2015 14:44, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 January 2015 14:31:32 poma wrote:
> >> On 20.01.2015 12:52, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I am running fedora 20 X86_64
> >&g
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 14:31:09 Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2015 15:10:15 poma wrote:
> > On 20.01.2015 14:44, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 20 January 2015 14:31:32 poma wrote:
> > >> On 20.01.2015 12:52, Andrew R Paterson w
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 16:20:26 poma wrote:
> On 20.01.2015 15:46, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 January 2015 14:31:09 Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 20 January 2015 15:10:15 poma wrote:
> >>> On 20.01.2015 14:44, Andrew R Paterson wrote
Is this any use?
http://realmike.org/blog/2011/02/09/live-desktop-streaming-via-dlna-on-gnulinux/comment-page-1/
andy
On Sunday 01 February 2015 23:57:31 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 00:12 +0100, poma wrote:
> > On 01.02.2015 23:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Sun, 201
On Wednesday 04 February 2015 00:55:29 Tim wrote:
> Jim Lewis wrote:
> >> Quick question about DHCP reservations: I have laptops with both
> >> wired and wireless NICs, is it okay to have the router assign the
> >> same IP to both interface?
>
> I wrote:
> > I seem to recall being able to do that,
On Friday 20 February 2015 12:35:30 gol...@aon.at wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to share one directory to watch movies and listen to music on tv. I
> habe a mediabox, which is connected and have an own ip in the same ip
> range. The problem is, i could not access without username and password.
> In the m
I have to say I find this disucssion interesting
I have spent what amounts to a small fortune (for me!) making sure that when I
upgrade from one version of LINUX to another (initially slackware but so far
fedora 9 - 20) that I can minimise the risk of (anaconda or whatever the
current insta
This poroblem occurs on other unices as well, try using the bg option in your
nfs fstab entry.
Andy
On Sunday 22 February 2015 21:39:13 Pete Travis wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2015 1:01 AM, "Jens Neu" wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > maybe since 2 weeks (close to upgrade to Twenty_One), my nfs shares are
>
On Monday 23 February 2015 09:10:24 Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> I have to say I find this disucssion interesting
> I have spent what amounts to a small fortune (for me!) making sure that when
> I upgrade from one version of LINUX to another (initially slackware but so
> far fedora
On Monday 23 February 2015 14:03:17 Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Andrew R Paterson
>
> wrote:
> > I have to say I find this disucssion interesting
> > I have spent what amounts to a small fortune (for me!) making sure that
> > when I
On Monday 23 February 2015 15:45:26 Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Andrew R Paterson
>
> wrote:
> > But maybe the problem is that not many people install/reinstall/fedup
> > often
> > enough to get familiar with it.
>
> Nor should they. T
On Friday 06 March 2015 06:20:48 Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 03/06/2015 05:28 AM, Daniel Jonsson wrote:
> > The problem is that when I boot either of the computers, it gets stuck
> > during the Plymouth splash screen, when the Fedora logo is being filled
> > up. It can be stuck there for tens of mi
One assumes that if you are migrating a filesystem to RAID, you are installing
a new disk (for e.g. RAID 1) (you need multiple disks - as in the acoronym
RAID).
So, if you install your new disk alongside your existing disk, create a RAID
mirror with only one partition (from the new disk) create
Hi,
I have recently upgraded from FC20 to FC21 using fedup - it was a
pleasantly smooth upgrade..
However. I do not appear to be being notified of any pending package
updates (maybe there arent any? - doubtfull!)..
And so (using KDE) I am trying to run system-config-services to c
On Friday 22 May 2015 12:04:52 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/22/2015 11:48 AM, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> > Is this a dbus problem?
> > have I got some other problem with my system config?
> > Am I just being stupid?
> > Any clues?
>
> I don't use package-kit, so
12:25 PM, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Thanks for that - I know of yumex (and agree - its very nice).
> > yum check-update however demonstrates why I get the feeling there is a
> > dbus
> > related problem.
>
> Good! If nothing else, you'
Hi,
this stupid argument rears its head again - snapshots vs "backups".
At least now someone advocating time-consuming "backups" has come up with a
logical argument - You "usually" put the system into a static state before
performing a "backup".
Trouble is - the "backup" usually means you
On Sunday 16 August 2015 21:14:38 Martin Cigorraga wrote:
> Hello Craig,
>
> Could you please copy the output it produces when you launch the
> application from the command line?
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015, 17:17 Craig Lanning wrote:
> > Something has happened in the last couple of months that cau
32 matches
Mail list logo
