Re: [389-users] New 389 ds install - cannot logon to adm console

2011-01-14 Thread Brian LaMere
well hello all, seems I'm having this problem myselffresh install, and when I go to the configuration tab of the 389-console it tells me: The user uid=admin,ou=Administrators,ou=TopologyManagement,o=NetscapeRoot does not have permission to perform this operation. When I click ok, a box

Re: [389-users] Replication

2011-01-14 Thread Brian LaMere
Odd, I got MMR working with SSL...and I only referenced that documentation (well, and assistance from this list and the IRC room...). It was 1.2.6, but surely that didn't really change things? Sounds like everyone is agreeing (even if indirectly) that the documentation is outdated though - is it

Re: [389-users] Replication

2011-01-14 Thread Brian LaMere
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/14/2011 10:32 AM, Brian LaMere wrote: Odd, I got MMR working with SSL...and I only referenced that documentation which documentation? the documentation that references things which are no longer true

Re: [389-users] superior attributes (not object classes)

2010-09-02 Thread Brian LaMere
that alpha 389-ds package is replaced in the repos; then I can just see if those problems (two of which I can reproduce easily, the third is a problem I can't get to go away) still exist. Thanks, and sorry! Brian LaMere -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https

[389-users] superior attributes (not object classes)

2010-08-31 Thread Brian LaMere
, Brian LaMere ps - I have 2 more emails I'm sending; since they are on different subjects, I thought I'd break them into different emails. Please let me know if this was a bad idea and I won't do it again. -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: [389-users] attributes from 00core.ldif put in 99users.ldif after schema update

2010-08-31 Thread Brian LaMere
if it happens again if loaded on an ec2 i686 instance... However, if what I'm using is an unstable version, it could just be that it was triggered by doing a reload (regardless of content), and had nothing to do with my schema at all. Is that more likely? Brian LaMere -- 389 users mailing list 389