anonymous access to them (or bind with any valid user -- a much more
involved fix).
Now, we move on...
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Gary Algier <gaali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mark:
>
> Thanks for the information. I got as far as step [2] and ran into a road
> block.
>
ny ideas why identical content, but on a different server, would result in
not being able to enumerate? And only for Solaris 10 clients?
Gary
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Mark Reynolds <marey...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Gary
>
> On 07/28/2016 03:55 PM, Gary Algier wrote:
easily "promote" B?
All the docs I find talk about multimaster. I don't think I am ready to go
there yet.
--
Gary Algier
--
389-users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
for the authentication.
Another option would be if the user did not need to be found in the passwd
data. I don't really need it for pass through auth anyway. Unfortunately,
pam fails if the user can't be found.
Any ideas?
--
Gary Algier
--
389-users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Well, I solved my own problem. I ran strace and saw it was opening files
in /root/.389-console. A simple "rm -rf /root/.389-console¨ fixed it.
Gary
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Gary Algier <gaali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, I found it in epel-testing but it does not work.
&
this.
I don't even know what kind of tool I am asking for or I might be able to
search for it and answer my own question.
Any pointers would be appreciated.
Gary Algier
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/14/2015 12:41 PM, Gary Algier wrote:
Hello,
I am in search of a tool to solve a new directory server issue in
relation to Active Directory...
For a long time here at work, we have had LDAP as our
. Is there anyone who has
successfully made this replication work that might be willing to help?
--
Gary Algier, WB2FWZg...@ulticom.com +1 856 787 2758
Ulticom Inc., 1020 Briggs Rd, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Fax:+1 856 866 2033
--
389 users mailing list
389-users
On 11/02/14 15:33, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 11/02/2014 02:22 PM, Gary Algier wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for help with creating a replication agreement between a
Solaris DS and a 389 DS. I says in the FAQ:
Sun DS 5.2
On 01/16/14 11:07, Louis-Marie Plumel wrote:
My environment is 99 % under linux and authentication is full LDAP.
For some 30 workstations under windows, i had to create an AD under 2008 R2.
For some reasons, i have to synchronize password beetween LDAP and AD. Linux
users will keep
a trust which will then negate having AD users change
their passwords. Just make sure you have fully redundant IPA and AD servers
so authentication will not break.
Dan
On 01/16/2014 12:08 PM, Gary Algier wrote:
On 01/16/14 11:07, Louis-Marie Plumel wrote:
My environment is 99 % under linux
DS.
--
Gary Algier, WB2FWZ gaa at ulticom.com +1 856 787 2758
Ulticom Inc., 1020 Briggs Rd, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Fax:+1 856 866 2033
Nielsen's First Law of Computer Manuals:
People don't read documentation voluntarily.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users
On 07/13/12 11:42, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/13/2012 09:41 AM, Gary Algier wrote:
Hello:
I just installed a fresh install of the 389 DS from EPEL and I see no schema:
-
# ldapsearch -x -h localhost -s sub -b cn=schema -w
On 07/16/12 12:10, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/16/2012 10:03 AM, Gary Algier wrote:
On 07/13/12 11:42, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/13/2012 09:41 AM, Gary Algier wrote:
Hello:
I just installed a fresh install of the 389 DS from EPEL and I see no schema
-release:CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
--
Gary Algier, WB2FWZ gaa at ulticom.com +1 856 787 2758
Ulticom Inc., 1020 Briggs Rd, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Fax:+1 856 866 2033
Nielsen's First Law of Computer Manuals:
People don't read documentation voluntarily.
--
389 users mailing list
system.
The problem with the second choice is that you could have people with
the same UID as system processes. When they do an ls -l they may see
that their files belong to smolt or nagios or similar. Also, they
would be able to edit files that perhaps should be off limits to them.
--
Gary
Timestamps in LDAP are generally represented by a string of digits followed by
Z. This is approximately an ISO 8601 format (ISO puts a T between the date
and time).It breaks down as in:
20110523133732Z
MMDDHHMMSSZ
2011 year
05 month
23 day of month
13 hour
37
Management
Suite (OIM) which is currently doing this function along with lots of other
unnecessary things.
Can anyone point me to where to find the old password sync tool? Or is there
a way to use the current one without replication, etc?
Thanks,
Gary
--
Gary Algier, WB2FWZ gaa
18 matches
Mail list logo
