On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 09:36 -0500, John Mellor wrote:
> Question for the repo managers,
>
> Why do I sometimes see invalid checksums for drpm downloads? E.g:
> This excerpt from the update this morning:
>
> > /var/cache/dnf/updates-7fc4c739b3909d9f/packages/selinux-policy-
> >
On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 18:54 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/1/19 5:27 AM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > On Friday, May 31, 2019 11:05:20 PM EDT Tim via users wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 17:18 -0400, Garry Williams wrote:
> > > > But, of course, the issue is why this happens in the first
On Fri, 2019-01-25 at 20:24 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 1/25/19 6:45 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > Is there a quicker way to protect my data when I give the drives away,
> > other than smashing the drives to bits?
>
> The quickest would be to encrypt the drives from the beginning. When
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 14:53 -0500, David A. De Graaf wrote:
> When a new Fedora is released, I immediately fetch the Live Xfce
> Spin .iso. As a Gnome hater, I want to avoid that entrapment.
> I've always found Xfce perfectly suited for me.
>
> This crucial piece of the release is missing at all
I don't have an NVME drive, but I came across this the other day:
https://community.wd.com/t/linux-support-for-wd-black-nvme-2018/225446/8
I have no idea what brand your NVME drive is, but perhaps this will
help.
Jonathan
On Sat, 2018-10-13 at 12:54 -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> And this
On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 11:02 -0600, JD wrote:
>
> On 09/15/2018 10:38 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 09:53 -0600, JD wrote:
> > > Fedora keeps old revisions of SW for EOL'ed releases.
> > >
> > > Does rpmfusion have a link f
On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 09:53 -0600, JD wrote:
> Fedora keeps old revisions of SW for EOL'ed releases.
>
> Does rpmfusion have a link for these EOL'ed releases?
http://archive.rpmfusion.org/
Found the link here: https://lisas.de/~adrian/?p=1321
Jonathan
On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 19:38 -0800, Dave Close wrote:
> I've been trying to get a new working PXE installation for F23 and it
> isn't working. I just noticed what might be the problem. Although
> I downloaded the vmlinuz and initrd.img from the F23 server
> version archive, when the installation
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:37 +0530, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> I used the standard Fedora gui interface to find the printer on my
> network, choose IPP, and follow all the prompts to find the printer
> make
> and model, and said yes to the recommended driver, screenshot here:
>
On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 17:04 -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2015-06-19 16:29, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/19/2015 01:13 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
I'm increasingly unconvinced that it has anything whatsoever to
do with
X. More like it can't start a login session. I'd guess that
Not sure why it's not enabled, but I would suggest opening a bug report
at
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedoracomponent=xbmc.
Jonathan
On 10/22/2014 07:47 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
XBMC for fedora as supplied by the RPM-fusion respository appears to not
have support
On 06/23/2014 12:49 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
I undertook a search for the string blueray in both yum and
dnf and both, in my view, behaved strangely.
From yum I received the following messages:
yum search Blueray
snip
This doesn't deal with yum/dnf messages, but if
On 06/09/2014 04:15 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they
have got recently in Yum? Or even something else! We've put together a
very short and simple survey. Let your
On Tue, 2013-12-31 at 11:24 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
Has anyone found a way to:
journalctl | grep last 10 minutes
journalctl --since -600
Jonathan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 16:43 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 19, 2013, at 4:14 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at a4:01 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
wrote:
Does anyone know exactly what's happening during the rebuild? I
On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 15:32 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
So what is the solution ?
I tried fedora 16, fedora 18, fedora 19 (gnome3), all give the same result
a \Phi is shown when a \Delta should be displayed.
Thank.
I've figured it out. I had wine-symbol-fonts installed, which provides
On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 15:48 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Humm,
removing wine-symbol-fonts, will remove wine!
and rootplot, root etc
I am not sure about such a soluton!!
I know nothing about root (aside from the fact that its documentation
subpackage is ridiculously large), but yum remove
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 18:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:18:37 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
but is wrong with evince.
The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:09 -0700, Jerome Yanga wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Jerome Yanga jerome.ya...@gmail.comwrote:
I have tried many configs and have failed to pxe boot a live Fedora 19 cd.
I need help in the boot parameters. Here is my current one.
LABEL
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 00:55 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
14 out of 118 - who cares?
so there was some invalid delta-files - that's why yum is designed
to fall back to the ordinary full RPM in such cases
snip
Should I file a bugzilla against yum (or something else)?
clearly: NO
The
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 18:33 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
I can assure you, I am not manually modifying anything installed by
those packages to cause this mismatch. I do notice they are all
32 bit packages, but I'm running 64 bit. Is yum trying to apply
a 64 bit delta to a 32 bit package or
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 08:55 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 12:36:25 +0300
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
I believe that's exactly what yum is doing. Now that yum-presto has
been merged into yum for Fedora 19, your best bet would be to file a bug
against yum itself.
Yea, I
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 21:48 -0500, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
I had F17 and updated it last week to F18. It was perfectly stable
and I had no problems with Gnome.
I did a fresh install of F18 (fresh drive) on Sunday and since then
Gnome 3 has locked up hard on me six times (three
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 17:00 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
I let it sit powered off for a while and tried rebooting running just
on battery, and this time it got past where it failed previously.
This time it ran file system checks on the various file systems, but
for some reason it also decided
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 19:24 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
Jonathan Dieter jdieter at lesbg.com writes:
Anyhow, a quick check in yum shows that both product-id and
subscription-manager aren't in the Fedora repositories. Removing them
(again, assuming you're on a Fedora machine) should fix
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 12:44 -0600, JD wrote:
# yum -y update
Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, downloadonly, etckeeper,
langpacks, presto, priorities, product-id, refresh-packagekit,
: subscription-manager
Updating certificate-based repositories.
Unable to read consumer
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 15:22 +, Paul Smith wrote:
I have installed
yum install gstreamer*
and tried several MP3 without any success. On F14 all these MP3 files
could be played with Totem.
FWIW, when I upgraded from F15 to F16, I was unable to play *any* media
through Totem (despite
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 19:44 +, Paul Smith wrote:
It is working now -- thanks for your help!
Paul
You're welcome
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 14:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
It appears that Mozilla upstream is going to force our hand here.
Apparently, Mozilla declared Firefox 4 EOL alongside the release of
Firefox 5 [1].
This is going to cause a lot of pain, especially with regards to
extensions.
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 23:06 -0700, JD wrote:
On 04/15/2011 10:58 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 22:33 -0700, JD wrote:
On 04/15/2011 09:04 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
http://cedarandthistle.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/on-binary-delta-algorithms/
Read the article and parts
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 22:33 -0700, JD wrote:
On 04/15/2011 09:04 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
http://cedarandthistle.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/on-binary-delta-algorithms/
Read the article and parts of the thesis.
So, the final version of the algorithm
still remains with the University of
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 11:04 -0600, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
On 01/30/2011 02:35 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 12:21 -0600, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
Hello all..
We have some RPM packages which have been built on a system with RPM
version 4.4.2.3 and are being installed
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 12:21 -0600, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
Hello all..
We have some RPM packages which have been built on a system with RPM
version 4.4.2.3 and are being installed on F14 based systems with
4.8.1.. We are creating the delta RPM packages on the F14 system with
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 21:05 +, Ron Yorston wrote:
Is there a problem with openoffice.org and delta RPMs? I've just
done a yum update on F14 and all the OOo packages were downloaded in
their entirety, whereas about 30 others came in as deltas. And it's
not like OOo is small. And this is
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 06:59 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
The delta rpms may be the problem but also the solution.
The deltarpms are not the problem. If the deltarpm doesn't build to a
byte-for-byte copy of the original rpm, the signature won't match and
yum will refuse to install it.
Jonathan
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 23:09 +0200, Dj YB wrote:
Hello,
my internet connection is pay per traffic so I prefer to use deltas when
possible.
Is it possible to know before you say 'yes' to the update process, what
packages are going to be fully downloaded and what packages have deltas?
I'm
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 01:49 -0400, David wrote:
Is it possible to make a deltaiso without having both the older ISO and
the Newer ISO on a local system.
Example. Fedora-14-Alpha-x86_64-Live.iso was downloaded. A
Fedora-14-Alpha-2-x86_64-Live.iso is availible for download.
Can a deltaiso
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 06:51 -0400, David wrote:
On 8/29/2010 2:30 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 01:49 -0400, David wrote:
Is it possible to make a deltaiso without having both the older ISO and
the Newer ISO on a local system.
Example. Fedora-14-Alpha-x86_64-Live.iso
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 21:56 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
The Fedora project (or an interested user) creates the deltaiso.
To clarify, this is theoretical. The Fedora project is *not* creating
official deltaisos right now. However, any deltaiso should build into a
byte-for-byte copy of the new
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:53 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
Maybe, but netgear doesn't seem to have the iso files for fedora 2 on their
open source download site, so it might be a bit difficult for someone
wanting to replicate their development environment to do it.
(Unless maybe there is a
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:59 +0300, Dj YB wrote:
hello,
since installation all updates had to be downloaded almost entirely and not
used the benefit of delta's
is anyone else seeing this problem or is something temporary in the repos?
how could I investigate the source of the problem if it
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:16 -0400, Jesse Palser wrote:
Hi,
I installed Fedora 13 Release Candidate # 2 32bit.
Where is OpenOffice in this release?
yum install openoffice.org-writer openoffice.org-calc \
openoffice.org-impress
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:12 -0400, Jesse Palser wrote:
Hi,
Why is OpenOffice not a default program ?
I believe it's because there's limited space on the LiveCD, and
OpenOffice pushes it over the top.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
users
43 matches
Mail list logo
