2013/7/30 Raman Gupta rocketra...@gmail.com:
On 07/30/2013 12:00 AM, poma wrote:
On 30.07.2013 05:47, Raman Gupta wrote:
I cannot blacklist the module, because the snd_hda_intel module that
drives the Intel sound card on my motherboard also recognizes the ATI
cards, according to lspci-v.
2012/3/10 Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
2012/3/9 Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk:
So you can stop a third party tampering with the modules on your system,
while keeping the ability to do so yourself. It's all about
I saw that the x86 modules can (_should_) be signed int the future. We
all know the pros and cons of signing but I'm wondering if all this
_crap_ has anything to do with the microsoft's idea to use a signed
bootloader, drivers, etc in the latest windoof 8. I think all of you
have heard that
2012/3/9 Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:07:55 +0100
...
will be locked down by default and require some undefined
screwing around to unlock. For x86 the spec currently does require they
can be unlocked...
...
Module signing itself isn't just useful for that though -
2012/3/9 Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk:
So you can stop a third party tampering with the modules on your system,
while keeping the ability to do so yourself. It's all about who owns the
keys. If you own the keys it becomes a useful security feature to some
users.
Alan
Put in other
2011/9/30 David Lehman dleh...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 10:57 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
As the title says, I'd like to reinstall fedora 15 with the netinstall
image because it's about 100mb (kernel and initrd) instead of the
install dvds. My problem is that those files located in
http
2011/9/29 Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com:
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 15:03 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:41:22 -0600,
Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com wrote:
Bash will expand $(inane -r) for you - you can pass it any kernel you have
headers installed for.
I
As the title says, I'd like to reinstall fedora 15 with the netinstall
image because it's about 100mb (kernel and initrd) instead of the
install dvds. My problem is that those files located in
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/x86_64/os/isolinux/
have long been
2011/9/28 Phil Meyer pme...@themeyerfarm.com:
On 09/28/2011 02:57 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
As the title says, I'd like to reinstall fedora 15 with the netinstall
image because it's about 100mb (kernel and initrd) instead of the
install dvds. My problem is that those files located in
http
2011/9/28 Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com:
Bash will expand $(inane -r) for you - you can pass it any kernel you have
headers installed for.
I wanted to jump in to suggest you reconsider motherboard driven fakeraid.
The mainboard becomes a single point of failure, and replacing it or
2011/9/28 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 21:25:56 +0200,
Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
That's the whole idea behind it. It's on a intel-p67 chipset with the
build-in intel-raid1. I tend to use an mdadm array but I'm not sure
which will be simpler to set
2011/7/6 Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com:
On 07/05/2011 10:08 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
2011/7/5 Jakub Jelinekja...@redhat.com:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:41:41PM +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
2011/6/12 Joshua C.joshua...@googlemail.com:
As the subject says I cannot recompile grub. Everytime I get
2011/7/5 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:41:41PM +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
2011/6/12 Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com:
As the subject says I cannot recompile grub. Everytime I get checking
whether the C compiler works... no. I explicitely installed all
packages
2011/7/4 Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com:
On 07/05/2011 07:41 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
2011/6/12 Joshua C.joshua...@googlemail.com:
As the subject says I cannot recompile grub. Everytime I get checking
whether the C compiler works... no. I explicitely installed all
packages from
http
2011/6/13 Andrew Parker andrewpar...@bigfoot.com:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
After upgrading to f15 the nm-applet cannot automatically connect to
hidden wlan networks. It sees them and I can connect to them manually.
The connect automatically
2011/6/12 James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@gmail.com:
You can't. The filesystem is marked as RO. Is this a CD/DVD media? If
it is NOT, you have to mount the media as Read-Write so that the label
can be updated.
James.
No, this started after I upgraded from f14 to f15. My grub entry says:
As the subject says I cannot recompile grub. Everytime I get checking
whether the C compiler works... no. I explicitely installed all
packages from
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/grub/0.97/74.fc15/data/logs/x86_64/root.log
and have attached those in the packages.log file. The only
2011/6/12 James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@gmail.com:
The kernel is first mounted read only so that it can be validated as not
corrupt and then remounted as read-write if it passed the check. I
would not change this unless you are certain that the kernel will never
become corrupted. This does
Hi
I'm greeted with Unable to fix label of /run: read-only file system.
every time I boot the system. After relabelling the system several
times and upgrading to the lastes selinux-policy (-29.fc15) I still
get this. There's though no obvious impact on the performance.
Does anyone have any idea
After I upgraded ot f15 I see that all messages are sent to dmesg but
after several days the /var/log/messages is still empty. So my logs
get deleted after every restart. How to fix this?
--joshua
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
When booting I get Starting Show Plymouth Boot Screen failed, see
'systemctl status plymouth-start.service' for details. The plymouth
seems to work fine though. Here is more information:
$ systemctl status plymouth-start.service
plymouth-start.service - Show Plymouth Boot Screen
Loaded:
2011/1/30 Matthew Saltzman m...@clemson.edu:
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 20:16 +0200, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote:
Using audacity for example . At first i could here no sound . But then
when i went to preferences and chose the usb camera , things worked
correctly . So i guess we can assume that the
Hi,
looking through the logs of the latest nightly compose builds I saw
that the x86_64 isos consist of i386 packages. Has someone switched
them over by accident?
--joshua
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
2010/9/2 James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
Joshua C. wrote:
From my point of view it looks like a fedora bug, not a wine bug. I
haven't tested the code from winehq but there were some commits with
some font changes in the lastest koji.
I got the same error with gnome and it also
2010/8/31 James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
Joshua C. wrote:
I found something very interesting. As I said eralier I tried the same
packages some months ago and everything worked fine. So I just tested
all the packgaes until i found the working one. To clarify before I
start: wine
2010/8/30 James Mckenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
Actually I need to run a simple batch file. That's why I used a
kde-livecd-f14-x86_64 and installed wine-core.i686 wine-wow.i686,
wine-common and wine-fonts. All dpendencies were pull automatically
Hi
I needed to use wineconsole and after installing the latest available
packages (1.3.1-1) I got the following message when trying to start
wineconsole cmd:
err:wineconsole:WINECON_Fatal Couldn't find a decent font, aborting
Installing different fonts and export LANG= en_US.UTF-8 didn't help.
2010/8/29 James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
Joshua C. wrote:
Hi
I needed to use wineconsole and after installing the latest available
packages (1.3.1-1) I got the following message when trying to start
wineconsole cmd:
err:wineconsole:WINECON_Fatal Couldn't find a decent font
2010/8/30 James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
Joshua C. wrote:
2010/8/29 James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
Joshua C. wrote:
Hi
I needed to use wineconsole and after installing the latest available
packages (1.3.1-1) I got the following message when trying to start
Hi,
I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to take.
We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core apps then
intel might have the lead. When it comes to scalability then amd is on
the
2010/8/8 Michael Miles mmami...@gmail.com:
JD wrote:
On 08/08/2010 10:21 AM, Michael Miles wrote:
I myself was going to replace my Phenom 2 965 with the 1090T as it was a
simple chip replacement but I decided to wait for the Bulldozer series.
The 1090T is a big improvement but in reality
2010/5/31 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Sun, 30 May 2010 22:01:12 +0200
Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
I expected this but without seeing the failed logs one can only guess.
Sorry, perhaps a 'state' file or something would be good to have.
I don't know. If the iso
Under http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/ are
supposed to be the nightly-builds of the latest code. However, a
quick look at the logs shows that those are build once in a week or
even not that often.
Can someone explain why? It's just a signle script to be run. I really
cannot
2010/5/30 Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com:
On 30/05/10 09:54, Joshua C. wrote:
--snip--
Can someone explain why? It's just a signle script to be run. I really
cannot understand where the problem is to build every night the isos?
More than likely the Release of F13, has brought the person
2010/5/30 Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com:
It's also based on tester feedback.
Package foo doesn't work.
If Package foo+1 doesn't make it into the build system for a week,
there's a weeks builds down the swanee.
That's why eyes rather than automation is used.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
2010/5/30 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Sun, 30 May 2010 10:54:37 +0200
Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
Under http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/ are
supposed to be the nightly-builds of the latest code. However, a
quick look at the logs shows that those
2010/5/30 Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com:
On 30/05/10 15:08, Joshua C. wrote:
--snip--
This is not exactly correct. It foo+1 isn't in the build system then
the automatic script will throw out an error.
No because how will an auto script know to expect foo+1.
It will accept fooX
37 matches
Mail list logo
