I don't know about all of them, but I can tell you that the system-config-*
packages are pretty much all obsolete (lvm, boot and firewall definitely
are), and smart has been obsolete on Fedora for a number of versions now (I
used to use it as my package manager, to be honest). I believe systemd-ui
Yeah, I for one noticed that Anaconda frequently has trouble updating the
status message when it's installing. In fact, you can force it to update
if you quickly go into and then leave the Root Password and/or User
sections. I thought it was fixed in 21, but maybe I'm thinking of
Only problem with 22 I've run into so far is that there's something wrong
with NFS. Otherwise, everything seems to be fine.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:14 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> Has anyone run fedup to 22?
>
> If yes, any problems with f22?
>
> Thanx.
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedorapr
Sorry, I meant the former. I used to like going through Smart to see what
packages are available, but without the RPM groupings it's harder to do in
Yumex (plus Fedora is phasing them out).
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Tim wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 16:58 -0500, Kelly M
I've mentioned it here before, but I'm not a huge fan of the current
options for checking out and installing Fedora packages. I notice a lot of
people mention just using yum/dnf directly, but I'm wondering what people
normally use to just check out new packages.
So how do people on this list norm
r
Flash with it...
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Stephen Morris
wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 12:24 AM, Kelly Miller wrote:
>
>> You could grab the Fresh Player Plugin as well, which allows Firefox to
>> use Chrome's Pepper Flash plugin (which is up to date).
>>
> I have
You could grab the Fresh Player Plugin as well, which allows Firefox to use
Chrome's Pepper Flash plugin (which is up to date).
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
> www.cnn.com is telling me that my version of flash-player is out of date
> with security risks so it won't dis
roups, but it's been
broken and appears to be abandoned, so it's no good anymore.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Robin Laing wrote:
> On 2014-10-17 20:12, Kelly Miller wrote:
>
>> I've been wondering about this for quite some time, but my recent troubles
>> with find
I've been wondering about this for quite some time, but my recent troubles
with finding a good GUI installer for Fedora 20 has brought it to the
forefront. Why is it that none of the GUI's for yum & dnf support the old
RPM groups? Were they left out of yum and PackageKit or something? And
can so
Yeah, they did... and refuted every single point made there, multiple
times. But people keep dragging it up, over and over again. See the topic
"New Group Calls For Boycotting SystemD".
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Balint Szigeti
wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 08:12 -0400, Tom Horsley wrot
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Robert Myers wrote:
> There is no fundamental difference that I know of between Ubuntu and
> Fedora with regard to virtualization.
>
> With regard to flash support, Ubuntu supports it more or less
> transparently and, if you want to use it on Fedora, you can spend
11 matches
Mail list logo
