Hello Michael,
On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 13:59 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 00:31:48 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > If I do not require the autoreconf step for a rebuild on CentOS 6 then
> > it is surely redundant on Fedora 22?
>
> No. On F22 i
Hello Michael,
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 12:10 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It explains itself, if you notice the patches that are applied, and the
> file name of the patches.
>
> libsndfile is patched to link with the system libgsm (from package "gsm")
> instead of building with a bundled copy.
Hi,
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 22:47 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Having pointed you at the "gsm" package, you can look up its package
> description. ;-p
:)
> > So what about the autoreconf step? Is that really necessary?
>
> The unbundling-gsm patch touches Makefile template/include files, so
Hi,
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 23:43 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 23:28:19 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > I skipped the autoreconf step on my C6 build and the build went fine.
> > What will the skipping of the autoreconf step have resulted in?
>
>
Hi,
The lisbsndfile-1.0.25-14.fc22 spec removes the GSM610 code and then
does an autoreconf.
What is the GSM610 code and why is it removed?
What is the autoreconf step supposed to accomplish? Build seems fine on
CentOS 6 without it.
Regards,
Leonard.
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna
