On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> That is because he said it to me in an e-mail off-list. All of Fedora is
> free is it not. As far as I know I can ask the Fedora developers to do
> anything I want them to do and they can ignore the request.
You can ask any developer on any
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> I have heard that argument before. The fwaact is currently tomcat is
> actively being developed and gnote is not. Rahul assurews us that
> sinchronation is in gnotes future and he inmplies that Snowy might work
> with gnotewws . We will have
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> It's just that some people are too lazy to read and understand two or three
> man pages.
Which two or three man pages cover everything selinux related?
I like SELinux, but its got its rough edges for example:
"/bin/bash is using a leaked
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> If I want to know about Fedora announcements I can use the mailing list.
> If I want to track Fedora goings on I can use RSS/ATOM feeds.
> I imagine the Fedora powers that be can also set up a twitter account.
I think that in this context, there
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> The exception would be the /boot
> partition, but it should be possible to keep my old kernels, yes?
I haven't tried this, but if everything else works, you ought to be
able to make an image of /boot using dd. (/boot being a relatively
small
To sum up this thread:
"I think cloud computing means Y, and Y is good because..."
"But I think cloud computing means X, and X is bad because..."
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/us
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Les wrote:
> Moreover you pointed out one of the real issues: month to month rental
> or lease or whatever you want to call it. And that is not counting the
> connection costs, storage premium if you are a non-standard user, or the
> lack of control, or the
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Tim wrote:
> This (the above, plus the whole of your message that I didn't quote) all
> sounds like they've just renamed mainframe computing as clouds.
Well the web probably sounded like they had just renamed gopher.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproje
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> When people invest their money into something, they want to be "in charge" of
> it. And if they are supposed to share it with others, there is bound to be a
> lot of friction.
One of the key ideas that makes Amazon's EC2 and S3 successful
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:27 PM, wrote:
> Just in general, what's the point in having server-disks (either local or
> "in-the-cloud" encrypted?
> As soon as you start them up, all we be de-crypted and your system is only
> protected by normal security measures.
>
> Only usefull purpose might be
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Ok, I understand what you are saying, but what you actually describe is an
> organizational issue, while I was having in mind a little bit more technical
> aspect.
No, what I'm describing is a situation. That situation developed over
time
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> It was a legitimate question, since I read somewhere that Ubuntu was using
> some kind of cloud service and how does one disable it.
>
> Is there some kind of guarantee that Fedora will not force one to store /home
> on a "Cloud server s
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Specifically, assuming that I have my own hardware to set the whole thing up,
> what is the difference between having a server (possibly virtualized), and
> having a server "on the cloud"? And what is the main benefit of the latter
> over
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> A properly-designed cloud computing solution is one where the virtual
> machines being hosted in the cloud can be fully encrypted so that the
> hosting provider cannot (feasibly) glean any information from them.
I do not see a point of
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Maurice wrote:
> For those locations running GLPI, are you using OCS Inventory NG as a
> companion tool (for inventory gathering)?
I am. I have a virtual machine running GLPI and OCS Server. I've
setup GLPI to import from OCS frequently (every hour or so).
For
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Though maybe smarter packaging by the rpm fusion people could
>> make using the proprietary nVidia drivers more newbie friendly.
> Definitely, as there is a whole lot of room for improvements (at least
> as far as I can see from my point
16 matches
Mail list logo
