Re: New Fedora DVD 64 Install replaced my previous GRUB2 info! (Dual Boot)

2011-07-12 Thread Nat Gross
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Nat Gross wrote: > I know that things just look bleak right now, someone please help me > see all my operating systems upon boot. > > Ok, the details: > Windows 7 Ultra system with ONE 1-TB hard drive. Purchased that way. > When the last Ubuntu

Re: New Fedora DVD 64 Install replaced my previous GRUB2 info! (Dual Boot)

2011-07-12 Thread Nat Gross
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 12:28 -0400, Nat Gross wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Mike Chambers wrote: >> > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:09 -0400, Nat Gross wrote: >> >> O >> >> UPDATE ON THE

Re: New Fedora DVD 64 Install replaced my previous GRUB2 info! (Dual Boot)

2011-07-12 Thread Nat Gross
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:09 -0400, Nat Gross wrote: >> O >> UPDATE ON THE SITUATION: >> I have since re-installed Fedora 15, this time telling it to erase all >> other LINUX partitions, but it still boots directl

Re: New Fedora DVD 64 Install replaced my previous GRUB2 info! (Dual Boot)

2011-07-12 Thread Nat Gross
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Nat Gross wrote: > I know that things just look bleak right now, someone please help me > see all my operating systems upon boot. > > Ok, the details: > Windows 7 Ultra system with ONE 1-TB hard drive. Purchased that way. > When the last Ubuntu

New Fedora DVD 64 Install replaced my previous GRUB2 info! (Dual Boot)

2011-07-11 Thread Nat Gross
I know that things just look bleak right now, someone please help me see all my operating systems upon boot. Ok, the details: Windows 7 Ultra system with ONE 1-TB hard drive. Purchased that way. When the last Ubuntu (11.4 I think) was released I installed it on the system in order to practice KDE

Re: F 15. 64 bit versus 32 bit.

2011-05-24 Thread Nat Gross
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 18:07, Jerry Feldman wrote: >> My statement is: >> 64-bit operating systems on X86-64 are faster than the same OS in 32-bits. > > How abonut a 32-bit JVM inside a 64-bit OS? Is that even possible? > (just thinking a

Re: F 15. 64 bit versus 32 bit.

2011-05-24 Thread Nat Gross
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 17:40, Jerry Feldman wrote: >> The bottom line here is you can't make a blanket statement >> that 64-bit code is slower. And if you have a decent optimizing >> compiler, your performance could improve. > > I donĀ“t m

Re: F 15. 64 bit versus 32 bit.

2011-05-24 Thread Nat Gross
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:49 -0400, Nat Gross wrote: >> Planning to install Fedora 15 on a new partition dual boot win 7. >> Hardware AMD 1090 (6 core) with 8 gig ram. >> Doing Java programming and plan to us

Re: F 15. 64 bit versus 32 bit.

2011-05-24 Thread Nat Gross
1. Thank you ALL for the quick positive response! 2. I am a bit confused as to when to use 32 bit components on a 64 bit os. Besides Flash, Java has the same option, and many more. On the 64 bit architecture, would I use 64 bit Java as well? Thanks again. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedor

F 15. 64 bit versus 32 bit.

2011-05-24 Thread Nat Gross
Planning to install Fedora 15 on a new partition dual boot win 7. Hardware AMD 1090 (6 core) with 8 gig ram. Doing Java programming and plan to use KVM machines with Fedora as the host os. Of course regular stuff on the web including videos, etc. So, the question is. Is it still advisable to go 32