On 02/10/2014 10:41 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 02/10/2014 12:09 PM, Robert P. J. Day issued this missive:
grr ... following the instructions here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel
on how to build a custom kernel (so
On 01/03/2014 08:29 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/03/2014 09:28 AM, Kevin Martin wrote:
If it's just going to be the same old thing then why bother?
It's new, it's different, it's *shiny!* For some people, that's all
that matters.
It's built on top of a scalable, fast and smart depsolver (libso
On 01/03/2014 07:28 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 01/03/2014 10:58 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 01/03/2014 05:04 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 01/03/2014 08:53 AM, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 01/03/2014 03:47 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
This is a Fedora-20 64 bit XFCE system.
Only
On 01/03/2014 05:04 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 01/03/2014 08:53 AM, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 01/03/2014 03:47 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
This is a Fedora-20 64 bit XFCE system.
Only once has this produced an update for me:
[root@box10 bobg]# dnf update
Resolving dependencies
On 10/09/2013 08:39 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 09/10/13 13:11, Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote:
On 9 October 2013 14:02, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
"root.log" returns a lot of information but I don't see what the
fault is.
Hi:
Paste both on paste (http://
On 04/24/2013 10:40 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/24/2013 03:35 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Which is just plain wong in case of nilfs, as it has no inode limit.
What does 'stat -f /' return on that system?
Well this is a strange beast:
[root@turre mnt]# stat -f .
File:
On 04/24/2013 10:40 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/24/2013 03:35 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Hi,
I am using Fedora-19-Alpha with nilfs2 on /.
While everything worked great with Fedora 17, the updated version of
yum also check for free inodes before executing the transaction:
Transaction
On 04/24/2013 03:35 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Hi,
I am using Fedora-19-Alpha with nilfs2 on /.
While everything worked great with Fedora 17, the updated version of
yum also check for free inodes before executing the transaction:
Transaction check error:
installing package . needs 40 in
On 02/01/2013 04:47 PM, Tethys wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
This is "supposed" to work, but so far I haven't been successful.
$ gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.a11y.keyboard slowkeys-enable false
It doesn't work for me either. I know nothing about gsettings, but
On 01/24/2013 09:42 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 01/24/2013 11:12 AM, Doug issued this missive:
On 01/24/2013 12:26 PM, Wojciech Komornicki wrote:
Expansion of the asterisk is handled by the shell. To see what such a
command
will do, issue the command
echo *.rpm
You will see the full l
On 07/23/2012 06:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.07.2012 17:39, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Reindl Harald wrote:
am i right that "Filedigests", "Filemd5s", "Provideversion",
"Pubkeys" and "Requireversion" are unused fragments of older
rpm/yum versions and can be removed?
Yes, they can be safely
On 06/03/2012 06:28 AM, JD wrote:
On 06/02/2012 08:02 PM, Edward M wrote:
On 06/02/2012 06:09 PM, JD wrote:
run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
but rpm exits with error message:
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error: xdfe-2.0.1.src.rpm cannot be inst
On 01/26/2012 02:58 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
I have a cheesy yum plugin I hacked up that allows me to run
a script right after yum finishes. I find this very useful
to restore hacks I may have made to my system which updates
may reverse.
This seems like such a useful concept, I figured there
would
On 01/12/2012 10:28 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Thursday 12 January 2012 05:53:42 g wrote:
if you compare "/etc/shadow" to "/etc/shadow.rpmnew" when it is there,
you will see that yum/rpm has added a program's name to "/etc/shadow"
when yum/rpm adds a new program that needs to be assigned an i
On 11/18/2011 12:26 PM, Karl wrote:
> I have a small library RPM which built OK on Fedora 13 but is broken on Fedora
> 16. Rpmbuild reports that the shared library in the package is required by
> the package itself. There is no "Provides" line, and when I try to install
> the RPM it reports:
>
>
On 09/26/2011 04:19 PM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:01:16PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> This is of no use whatsoever in this situation, it doesn't help
>> reconstructing the accidentally erased rpmdb contents.
>> <>
>
> Hmm...single po
On 09/25/2011 11:28 PM, g wrote:
> On 09/25/2011 08:15 PM, sean darcy wrote:
>> Doing something really silly, which erased /var/lib/rpm/. Sigh.
>>
>> Found http://www.sharp-tools.net/archives/000765.html which talks about
>> recovering from an erasure by using a log file /var/lib/rpmpkgs that a
>>
On 08/21/2011 06:15 PM, Mark Hittinger wrote:
>
> Hey guys
>
> Running Transaction
>Updating : 4:perl-libs-5.12.4-160.fc15.i686 1/4
> Error unpacking rpm package 4:perl-libs-5.12.4-160.fc15.i686
> error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/local/lib/perl5: cpio: mkdir
> Updating : 4:
On 05/25/2011 07:56 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>> When I start a XFCE session on F15, I get a Gnome terminal window
>> and I hear a voice from the computer. Can I avoid this?
>
> Odd.
>
> Kill them off and logout and save your
On 05/16/2011 10:00 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Is there a way to prevent a pkg from being deleted accidentaly when
> using apt.
>
> With yum you can use a conf file.
>
> Anyone how to use it with apt
>
> checked man apt, man apt_prefrences
> also googled, some Ubuntu solutions.
>
You can add packag
On 04/13/2011 04:55 AM, JD wrote:
> On F14, - with latest updates as of an hour ago.
>
> Whenever I try to build a package from source rpm,
> using rpmbuild, I get scrolling output like:
>
> error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16)
>15<(empty)
>14<
On 03/30/2011 06:31 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:58:02 -0400
> Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
>> On Mar 24, 2011 7:20 AM, "Steve Blackwell" wrote:
>>> Ah, Thanks. That helped. Now I need to lookup the syntax of the
>>> install macro.
>>
>> The install I'm referring to here is a no
On 02/20/2011 08:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I was googling for a way to figure out a dependency chain for a
> package I'm trying to flush out a spec file for and build. There
> doesn't seem to be a non-destructive equivalent to "yum erase
> " to see if I need to explicitly include a package/progr
23 matches
Mail list logo
