Re: Mailing List Etiquette (was Re: can't run sshd on 23456 in Fedora 19)

2013-07-10 Thread Vaclav Mocek
> > Reindl, > > Please understand that your use of the English language comes across as > violent and aggressive. Excessive accenting, excessive snipping, and > excessive profanity make up a majority of your postings to Fedora > mailing lists. Very subjective impressionsà. I have no problems with

Re: Fedora 18, future isn't too good as it seems :-

2012-11-01 Thread Vaclav Mocek
It seems that F18 will be the first version where the recomended way of installation will be installation of the previous version and distribution upgrade ... :-). Vaclav M. On Nov 1, 2012 3:55 AM, "Junayeed Ahnaf" wrote: > Hello, > > > I'm seeing that Fedora 18 has been delayed 5 times already,

Re: After the today's update git depends on subversion

2012-07-25 Thread Vaclav Mocek
Hi Todd, On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Hi Vaclav, > > > Without looking closely, it surely appears to be an unintended bug. Those > Git/SVN/*.pm files should be moved to the git-svn package. Please file a > bugzilla and either Adam or I will get that fixed up. > > Re

After the today's update git depends on subversion

2012-07-25 Thread Vaclav Mocek
Hi all, I noticed that the today's update of git brought dependency between git and subversion. Git requires perl-Git, perl-Git depends on subversion-perl and subversion-perl depends on subversion. It looks like that the used git spec file doesn't reflect the changes in the latest release of git

A bit OT: git - ridiculous memory requirements

2012-03-29 Thread Vaclav Mocek
Hi all, I have a cloned GCC git repository, on PC with 1.5GB of RAM and 3GB swap. When I run "$git gc --aggressive", I will get after few hours an error: $ git gc --aggressive Counting objects: 1332887, done. Delta compression using up to 2 threads. fatal: Out of memory, malloc failed (tried to

Re: Separate /usr partition

2011-04-14 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 04/14/2011 07:40 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 04/14/2011 08:12 PM, Mike McCarty wrote: >> Vaclav Mocek wrote: >>> Well, ldd confirms that it is an urban legend. >> On my system ldd is in /usr/bin, not /bin > ldd an analysis tool (Print shared library dependenc

Re: Separate /usr partition

2011-04-14 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 04/14/2011 07:31 PM, JD wrote: > Vaclav Mocek wrote: >>> It reminds me, that few months back I observed that Fedora's binaries in >>> /bin are much bigger that Slackware's binaries (tens of %), both +- the >>> same version. Now, I am wondering why, if it

Re: Separate /usr partition

2011-04-14 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 04/14/2011 01:58 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 04/14/2011 02:01 PM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: >> On 03/10/2011 05:08 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >>> Kam Leo wrote: >>>> It probably has less to do with the boot process and more with disto >>>> upgra

Re: Separate /usr partition

2011-04-14 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 03/10/2011 05:08 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Kam Leo wrote: >> It probably has less to do with the boot process and more with disto >> upgrading; i.e. less likely that user files get clobbered if /usr is >> separate. > Nope. It has everything to do with booting. Some packages in /bin > depe

Re: ATI FirePro V3800 question.

2011-04-04 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 04/03/2011 03:57 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > On 02/04/11 23:32, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 22:17:43 +0200, >> "Erik P. Olsen" wrote: >>> I've found that on F12 I have mesa-dri-drivers-experimental installed >>> whereas on >>> F14 it is "only" mesa-dri-drivers. I've n

Re: Direction of Fedora desktop manager Gnome, related to complaints in OT morons thread

2011-03-21 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 03/21/2011 06:19 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 03/21/2011 10:16 AM, stan wrote: >> And it >> begs the question of*why* people might be deserting Fedora. > No it doesn't; it *ASKS* the question. "Begging the question" is a > logical fallacy. Please stop using that term like an illiterate moron, >

Embedded Lua scripts in RPM

2010-11-28 Thread Vaclav Mocek
Hi all, I try to familiarise with [new] RPM features (4.8+). One feature is the embedded Lua interpreter (http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/RpmLua), however, I am struggling to find real [more advanced] examples, how it is being used in SPECs. Please, can anybody give me some links? Cheers, Vac

Re: Orinoco WiFi card

2010-11-28 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/28/2010 01:25 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > Thanks. I'll note that. > I'm actually using ndiswrapper now with a Vivanco USB WLAN dongle > (ID 0457:0163 Silicon Integrated Systems), > which seems to be working well under Fedora-14 and Windows XP. > But I would prefer not to use ndiswrapper if

Re: Orinoco WiFi card

2010-11-27 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/27/2010 12:33 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > USB WiFi I forgot to mention, I have Edimax EW-7711UTn USB adapter (Amazon UK) and it works quite reliably with F14 and rpmfusion RaLink drivers. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http

Re: Orinoco WiFi card

2010-11-27 Thread Vaclav Mocek
It looks like a regression which happens sometimes for an older and rarely used hardware.The driver is no longer under active development (http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/orinoco/), so you should contact the maintainer of the driver and hopefully they will have time and needed hardware to f

Re: Never Hacked or Infected--Yet (Was: Re: End of life for FC12?)

2010-11-13 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/12/2010 05:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > I would never consider using Fedora on a system where security was paramount. > That's why I only use it on my home desktop systems. > > And what do you use instead? I have never had a security problem with Fedora. -- users mailing list user

Re: Fedora-14: Slow nVidia video

2010-11-13 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/13/2010 07:27 AM, William Perkins wrote: > > Thank you for telling me about the Xorg log file. I should have saved the > old log file that showed the problem, but it gets rewritten during the > boot process. > No, it is not. See: ls /var/log/Xorg.* -- users mailing list users@lists.fed

Re: Another Question About Webcams in F13

2010-11-01 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/02/2010 01:11 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: It is a nasty marketing trick. You have 1.3X MP camera and every pixel has three sub-pixels (red, green, blue). So the total amount of (sub)pixels is: 3 x 1.3X ~= 5MP. Of cause 3 x1.3 is not 5MP and I am going to sleep because Another trick is

Re: Another Question About Webcams in F13

2010-11-01 Thread Vaclav Mocek
It is a nasty marketing trick. You have 1.3X MP camera and every pixel has three sub-pixels (red, green, blue). So the total amount of (sub)pixels is: 3 x 1.3X ~= 5MP. Another trick is that the higher "resolution" - understand the size of image - is artificially increased using an interpolation

Re: Fedora 12

2010-11-01 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/02/2010 12:54 AM, Adil Adil wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to get and install fedora 12. The reason for that is that I'm > gonna use a software that has been tested only with fedora 12.na > > Thank you > > > Download the installation ISO image, you can find the list of mirrors here: h

Re: F12: pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum

2010-11-01 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/01/2010 06:24 PM, g wrote: > On 11/01/2010 04:23 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: > > > >> I can't sleep >> > i know the feeling. but i did get some sleep. using melatonin. ;) > > > >> I use for example the following repositories: &g

Re: F12: pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum

2010-10-31 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/01/2010 03:35 AM, g wrote: > On 11/01/2010 02:17 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: > > > anyway, to all of other post... kafba. > > >> I am going to sleep, 2:15AM, it will be torture to get up at 6:45AM. >> Thanks "g". >> > welco

Re: F12: pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum

2010-10-31 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/01/2010 02:12 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: > On 11/01/2010 01:50 AM, g wrote: > >> oops... >> >> On 11/01/2010 01:40 AM, g wrote: >> >> >>> On 11/01/2010 01:34 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 11/

Re: F12: pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum

2010-10-31 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/01/2010 01:50 AM, g wrote: > oops... > > On 11/01/2010 01:40 AM, g wrote: > >> On 11/01/2010 01:34 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: >> >>> On 11/01/2010 01:23 AM, g wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/01/2010 01:12 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: >

Re: F12: pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum

2010-10-31 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/01/2010 02:07 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: > On 11/01/2010 02:04 AM, g wrote: > >> On 11/01/2010 01:57 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> The yum complains about "pkgtags.sqlite.gz". The checksum of the file >>> &quo

Re: F12: pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum

2010-10-31 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/01/2010 02:04 AM, g wrote: > On 11/01/2010 01:57 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: > > > >> The yum complains about "pkgtags.sqlite.gz". The checksum of the file >> "pkgtags.sqlite" in the archive is the same as described in the file >> "rep

Re: F12: pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum

2010-10-31 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/01/2010 01:40 AM, g wrote: > On 11/01/2010 01:34 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: > >> On 11/01/2010 01:23 AM, g wrote: >> >>> On 11/01/2010 01:12 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: >>> > >>>> I get the followi

Re: F12: pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum

2010-10-31 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 11/01/2010 01:23 AM, g wrote: > On 11/01/2010 01:12 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I get the following message every time I run yum [search|update|info]: >> >> "pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum" >> >

F12: pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum

2010-10-31 Thread Vaclav Mocek
Hi all, I get the following message every time I run yum [search|update|info]: "pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum" It is a problem of update repository and any cleaning doesn't help. I compared the checksum of my local file and checksum of the same file downloaded from several mir

Re: F13/F14 on an iPad ?

2010-10-23 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 10/23/2010 09:23 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 17:04 +0100, Vaclav Mocek wrote: > >> The problem is that ARM is for Fedora the secondary architecture; unless >> it is changed I don't expect we can use it with some tablets. >> > F14 i

Re: changing permissions for mounted drives

2010-10-23 Thread Vaclav Mocek
On 10/23/2010 06:22 PM, sumatheja wrote: > Sumatheja Dasararaju Well, I suggest to run "man mount" and read the section "File Independent Mount Options". -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list

Re: F13/F14 on an iPad ?

2010-10-23 Thread Vaclav Mocek
The problem is that ARM is for Fedora the secondary architecture; unless it is changed I don't expect we can use it with some tablets. V.M. On 10/22/2010 05:10 PM, James Szinger wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >> I would have little interest >> in it

RPM && soft dependencies

2010-02-19 Thread Vaclav Mocek
Hello, does somebody know, what is the current situation regarding soft dependencies in Fedora? OpenSuse already supports them (http://en.opensuse.org/Software_Management/Dependencies) and according the link http://stick.gk2.sk/blog/2009/10/rpm-summit-at-the-opensuse-conference-2009/ it shou