Re: [389-users] Req : Multimaster replication query

2011-06-22 Thread sigid@JINLab
On 06/22/2011 01:16 PM, s.varadha rajan wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone can help me, regarding my below query ? > > Regards, > Varad > > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Rich Megginson > > wrote: > > __ > On 06/20/2011 11:42 PM, s.varadha rajan wrote: >> Hi Rich

Re: [389-users] Req : Multimaster replication query

2011-06-22 Thread s.varadha rajan
Hi Sigid, Thanks for the reply.fedora-team,finally didn't update anything my query.hopefully, they will reply back soon.Meantime, will try your suggestions. Regards, Varad On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:44 PM, sigid@JINLab wrote: > On 06/22/2011 01:16 PM, s.varadha rajan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Any

Re: [389-users] Req : Multimaster replication query

2011-06-22 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/22/2011 03:10 AM, s.varadha rajan wrote: Hi Sigid, Thanks for the reply.fedora-team,finally didn't update anything my query.hopefully, they will reply back soon.Meantime, will try your suggestions. What information are you waiting for? mmr.pl has no maintainer. Regards, Varad On We

Re: [389-users] Req : Multimaster replication query

2011-06-23 Thread solarflow99
If you have that kind of need for high availability, you could provide better redundancy in other ways. Why do you need MMR for this? You could simply setup a 389 consumer, and use something like LVS to provide automatic failover, or even just do a DNS switch to point to the consumer if ever need