Re: 32 bit pam-libs?

2022-08-21 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 10:52:42 -0500 Javier Perez wrote: > Still no resolution? I did a dnf erase on the old 32 bit lib and let it take a couple of things with it, and haven't had a single problem since then. I don't know why the 32 bit lib was installed, but removing it let the update proceed and

Re: 32 bit pam-libs?

2022-08-21 Thread Javier Perez
Hi, I am getting this exact problem since about a week or two weeks ago that I noticed. Still no resolution? Thx On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 1:08 PM stan via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:17:05 -0400 > Tom Horsley wrote: > > > For a few days now, I've been

Re: 32 bit pam-libs?

2022-07-27 Thread stan via users
On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:17:05 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote: > For a few days now, I've been getting update errors because > (apparently) the 32 bit pam isn't yet in the repos even though the 64 > bit version is newer: They build from the same source package,

32 bit pam-libs?

2022-07-27 Thread Tom Horsley
For a few days now, I've been getting update errors because (apparently) the 32 bit pam isn't yet in the repos even though the 64 bit version is newer: Problem 1: pam-1.5.2-12.fc36.i686 has inferior architecture - cannot install both pam-1.5.2-13.fc36.x86_64 and pam-1.5.2-12.fc36.x86_64 -