Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-15 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 11 March 2010 11:56:56 pm Mike McCarty wrote: Typical root level directories one might find are /bin system user programs, not needed /boot system boot programs config, not needed /dev in modern systems, managed by udev not needed /etc system

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-12 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 15:21 -0700, Stuart McGraw wrote: Yesterday I had a little accident when I accidentally deleted an unknown number of files in /var. Since I haven't seen anyone else mention it, I will: The chances of that happening are drastically reduced when you don't run as the root

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-12 Thread Stuart McGraw
On 03/11/2010 06:07 PM, Mike McCarty wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:29 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I back up all of /etc and /usr/local. Also /opt if it exists. Is /opt really likely to contain some configuration information that a

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-12 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 10:59 -0700, Stuart McGraw wrote: On 03/11/2010 09:02 PM, Craig White wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 22:32 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:54 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 20:13 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu,

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-12 Thread Rick Stevens
On 03/12/2010 10:11 AM, Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 10:59 -0700, Stuart McGraw wrote: On 03/11/2010 09:02 PM, Craig White wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 22:32 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:54 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 20:13 -0430,

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-12 Thread Terry Polzin
On Friday 12 March 2010 12:59, Stuart McGraw wrote: find /etc -type f -name \*.conf /home anaconda-ks.cfg Plus any specific apps, data configs unique to that system -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-11 Thread Stuart McGraw
I currently backup user only my user files with the understanding that if I lose important system files, I will reinstall the system from distribution media. Yesterday I had a little accident when I accidentally deleted an unknown number of files in /var. But since the rpm database was still

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-11 Thread Mike McCarty
Stuart McGraw wrote: [...] since the rpm database was still intact, I was able to rpm --verify all my packages, identify those with missing /var files and reinstall just those rpms. Congratulations on your recovery. Which leads to my question... Are there certain files and

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 15:21 -0700, Stuart McGraw wrote: I currently backup user only my user files with the understanding that if I lose important system files, I will reinstall the system from distribution media. Yesterday I had a little accident when I accidentally deleted an unknown

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-11 Thread Mike McCarty
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I back up all of /etc and /usr/local. Also /opt if it exists. Is /opt really likely to contain some configuration information that a reinstall wouldn't set up? ISTM that, if the system is modern enough to use /opt for its install, then its config would also be in

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:29 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I back up all of /etc and /usr/local. Also /opt if it exists. Is /opt really likely to contain some configuration information that a reinstall wouldn't set up? ISTM that, if the system is modern enough to

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-11 Thread Mike McCarty
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:29 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I back up all of /etc and /usr/local. Also /opt if it exists. Is /opt really likely to contain some configuration information that a reinstall wouldn't set up? ISTM that, if the system

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-11 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 20:13 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:29 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I back up all of /etc and /usr/local. Also /opt if it exists. Is /opt really likely to contain some configuration information that a

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:54 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 20:13 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:29 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I back up all of /etc and /usr/local. Also /opt if it exists. Is /opt really

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-11 Thread Rick Sewill
/opt (and /usr/local) are likely to contain stuff that wasn't installed via rpm or yum, thus needs to be preserved. That's all. YMMV. what about /var ? /var/www/html /var/www/named /var/lib/dhcpd /var/lib/imap /var/cache/samba Did they move /var/named to /var/www/named?

Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?

2010-03-11 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 22:09 -0600, Rick Sewill wrote: Did they move /var/named to /var/www/named? nope... pebkac ;-) Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org