On 02/15/2011 01:37 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> I'm sorry that it appeared to be personal, but that's one problem with
> threading - you have to attach to something, and it tends to be the last
> message in the thread that catches it when such a general comment is made.
> Since your story was not part
On Monday 14 February 2011 19:05:36 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 12:38 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > Why is it that some people on this list think it clever to publicly
> > humiliate? Gentle reminders off-list are so much more effective.
>
> The story wasn't meant to humiliate or otherwise chastis
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 20:38 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> Why is it that some people on this list think it clever to publicly
> humiliate? Gentle reminders off-list are so much more effective.
If the idea was to humiliate, I wouldn't have used a euphemism.
Aside from that, whether private communic
On 02/11/2011 12:38 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> Why is it that some people on this list think it clever to publicly humiliate?
> Gentle reminders off-list are so much more effective.
The story wasn't meant to humiliate or otherwise chastise the OP; it was
just a story about a badly-configured mailin
On Friday 11 February 2011 19:27:15 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 10:50 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Please don't reply to digests, and especially don't reply to digests and
> > quite the entire fscking digest in your message (which will now show up
> > all over again in the next digest).
>
