On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:55:28 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 9/29/20 8:29 AM, stan via users wrote:
> >>> This is not the reality I live in though. New-style high level
> >>> programming languages tend to avoid being just a wrapper around C
> >>> APIs. And thus they implement minimal DNS clients th
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:25:13 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-09-29 23:29, stan via users wrote:
> > For me, the implication of that is that I am no longer in control of
> > DNS, etc. If some program has hard coded DNS servers, they bypass
> > everything and just ignore system settings. Am I u
On 9/29/20 8:29 AM, stan via users wrote:
This is not the reality I live in though. New-style high level
programming languages tend to avoid being just a wrapper around C
APIs. And thus they implement minimal DNS clients themselves,
ignoring the LLMNR, mDNS and so on.
Not just for DNS. For SMTP
On 2020-09-29 23:29, stan via users wrote:
> For me, the implication of that is that I am no longer in control of
> DNS, etc. If some program has hard coded DNS servers, they bypass
> everything and just ignore system settings. Am I understanding
> correctly?
You're not understanding it correctl
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:29:33 -0700
stan via users wrote:
> There is currently a large thread in devel discussing the
> implementation of systemd-resolved for resolving DNS.
I hope I'll still be able to disable and mask systemd-resolved
by the time they finish all their improvements.
_
Hi,
There is currently a large thread in devel discussing the
implementation of systemd-resolved for resolving DNS. As part of that
I read this:
> > This is not the reality I live in though. New-style high level
> > programming languages tend to avoid being just a wrapper around C
> > APIs. And t
