On 02/12/2010 06:39 AM, Tobias Ringström wrote:
Why would anyone even want user specific display settings? Are users
> expected to move monitors around between logging in? Per user settings
> might be useful as a feature, but it's a very unfriendly default, or am
> I missing something?
In my house
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> I use the big Dell WFP3008, which doubles up pixels quite
> nicely to 1280 x 800. Mind you, are you sure you don't just
> need new glasses?
It's not that I can't focus. It's that I don't want to have to.
Focussing all day long on text on
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
>> 2010/2/12 Tobias Ringström :
Thanks for the trouble but see my answer to Tobias Ringström.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
2010/2/12 Tobias Ringström :
> On 02/12/2010 08:47 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>> I'm trying in vain to get Twinview to work with NVIDIA's proprietary
>> drivers. You know, images that show in a 5x4 format on my Viewsonic
>> monitor showing fullscreen in 5x4 format on my Sony TV and images that
>> are
On 02/12/2010 12:17 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
>> What I've been looking for, for a long time, yet am unable to find, is
>> a very large, yet LOW resolution LCD display.
>>
>> What I would like to see are great big fat square sharp pixels, with
>> great big, sharply
On 10-02-12 01:56:46, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> What I've been looking for, for a long time, yet am unable to find,
> is a very large, yet LOW resolution LCD display.
>
> What I would like to see are great big fat square sharp pixels, with
> great big, sharply defined and completely non-
Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> What I've been looking for, for a long time, yet am unable to find, is
> a very large, yet LOW resolution LCD display.
>
> What I would like to see are great big fat square sharp pixels, with
> great big, sharply defined and completely non-antialiased text.
if yo
Marcel Rieux wrote:
> 2010/2/12 Tobias Ringström :
>
>> I'm using two 1280x1024 displays rotated 90 degrees with an Nvidia
>> graphics card, and I was very impressed by Fedora 12, because it was the
>> first Fedora release where I could get this setup working without using
>> Nvidia's closed sou
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 09:45 +0100, Tobias Ringström wrote:
> On 02/12/2010 09:26 AM, birger wrote:
> > Placement of screens is a different story. No, users are not supposed to
> > move their screens around. What they frequently do is move the computers
> > around. You know - laptops? For laptops yo
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 00:27 -0800, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> GnuStep isn't supported on Fedora because of some manner of Political
> Insanity. Cocoa and GnuStep software is always packaged in small
> directory trees known as bundles; all of the files that on a
> traditional *NIX box are s
On 02/12/2010 09:26 AM, birger wrote:
> Placement of screens is a different story. No, users are not supposed to
> move their screens around. What they frequently do is move the computers
> around. You know - laptops? For laptops you definitely want users to
> control placement of screens, right? A
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 07:39 +0100, Tobias Ringström wrote:
> Why would anyone even want user specific display settings? Are users
> expected to move monitors around between logging in? Per user settings
> might be useful as a feature, but it's a very unfriendly default, or am
> I missing somethi
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Tim wrote:
> Why do people repeatedly get this so wrong? (Users and those making the
> systems.) The pixel count and resolution should be set to match the
> display card and the monitor, it's the FONT SIZE and graphics sizes that
> you should change.
My weary e
On 02/12/2010 08:47 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> I'm trying in vain to get Twinview to work with NVIDIA's proprietary
> drivers. You know, images that show in a 5x4 format on my Viewsonic
> monitor showing fullscreen in 5x4 format on my Sony TV and images that
> are 16x9 filling up all the TV screen.
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 22:56 -0800, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> It would make sense for the cathode ray tube multisync monitors from
> the days of yore.
>
> Obsessive geek types could set the resolution very high to fit more
> source code on the screen...
>
> ... while those with poor eyes
2010/2/12 Tobias Ringström :
> I'm using two 1280x1024 displays rotated 90 degrees with an Nvidia
> graphics card, and I was very impressed by Fedora 12, because it was the
> first Fedora release where I could get this setup working without using
> Nvidia's closed source driver, and I didn't even h
Tobias Ringström wrote:
> I'm using two 1280x1024 displays rotated 90 degrees with an Nvidia
> graphics card, and I was very impressed by Fedora 12, because it was the
> first Fedora release where I could get this setup working without using
> Nvidia's closed source driver, and I didn't even hav
2010/2/11 Tobias Ringström :
> Why would anyone even want user specific display settings? Are users
> expected to move monitors around between logging in? Per user settings
> might be useful as a feature, but it's a very unfriendly default, or am
> I missing something?
It would make sense for the
I'm using two 1280x1024 displays rotated 90 degrees with an Nvidia
graphics card, and I was very impressed by Fedora 12, because it was the
first Fedora release where I could get this setup working without using
Nvidia's closed source driver, and I didn't even have to fiddle with
xorg.conf. Aft
19 matches
Mail list logo
