Re: Drive ordering mechanism /dev/sda /dev/sdb etc

2016-08-02 Thread Robin Laing
On 01/08/16 00:51, Philip Rhoades wrote: People, I know that it is possible to refer to drives by various naming conventions: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Persistent_block_device_naming but it is annoying that the "SCSI" drive (SATA and USB) order in which their corresponding devic

Re: Drive ordering mechanism /dev/sda /dev/sdb etc

2016-08-02 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: > People, > > I know that it is possible to refer to drives by various naming conventions: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Persistent_block_device_naming > > but it is annoying that the "SCSI" drive (SATA and USB) order in which the

Re: Drive ordering mechanism /dev/sda /dev/sdb etc

2016-08-02 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 08/01/2016 10:16 PM, jd1008 wrote: > On 08/01/2016 02:01 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >> Or maybe udev rules? They used to work many Fedora versions ago. >> > Isn't progress wonderful? I'm not implying that they are currently broken, probably they are ok. But my experience with them is at Fedora

Re: Drive ordering mechanism /dev/sda /dev/sdb etc

2016-08-01 Thread jd1008
On 08/01/2016 02:01 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: On 08/01/2016 07:23 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 07/31/2016 11:51 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote: but it is annoying that the "SCSI" drive (SATA and USB) order in which their corresponding device nodes are added is arbitrary - is there some way of forcin

Re: Drive ordering mechanism /dev/sda /dev/sdb etc

2016-08-01 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 08/01/2016 07:23 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 07/31/2016 11:51 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote: >> but it is annoying that the "SCSI" drive (SATA and USB) order in which >> their corresponding device nodes are added is arbitrary - is there some >> way of forcing the order to what I want? ie I have th

Re: Drive ordering mechanism /dev/sda /dev/sdb etc

2016-08-01 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 07/31/2016 11:51 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote: People, I know that it is possible to refer to drives by various naming conventions: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Persistent_block_device_naming but it is annoying that the "SCSI" drive (SATA and USB) order in which their corresponding de

Drive ordering mechanism /dev/sda /dev/sdb etc

2016-07-31 Thread Philip Rhoades
People, I know that it is possible to refer to drives by various naming conventions: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Persistent_block_device_naming but it is annoying that the "SCSI" drive (SATA and USB) order in which their corresponding device nodes are added is arbitrary - is there