On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 13:41 -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> I remember at one time being able to have the checksum program compare
> the results to the checksum file. Worked great when you were summing
> a dozen CDs, but can't seem to find the documentation on that feature
> right now.
man shasum
--- On Sun, 1/31/10, Reg Clemens wrote:
> > On 10-01-31 18:51:00, Patrick
> Bartek wrote:
> > > --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Tony Nelson
>
> > > wrote:
> > ...
> > > > All disks always fail the built-in test
> here, due to the
> > > > permanent kernel bug. A more robust test
> is:
> > > >
> > > >
--- On Sun, 1/31/10, Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 10-01-31 18:51:00, Patrick Bartek
> wrote:
> > --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Tony Nelson
>
> > wrote:
> ...
> > > All disks always fail the built-in test here, due
> to the
> > > permanent kernel bug. A more robust test is:
> > >
> > > # cmp /dev/dvd /
On Monday 01 February 2010, Reg Clemens wrote:
>> On 10-01-31 18:51:00, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> > --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Tony Nelson
>> > wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > > All disks always fail the built-in test here, due to the
>> > > permanent kernel bug. A more robust test is:
>> > >
>> > > # cmp
> On 10-01-31 18:51:00, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Tony Nelson
> > wrote:
> ...
> > > All disks always fail the built-in test here, due to the
> > > permanent kernel bug. A more robust test is:
> > >
> > > # cmp /dev/dvd /path/to/iso
> >
> > You can also verify the bur
On 10-01-31 18:51:00, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Tony Nelson
> wrote:
...
> > All disks always fail the built-in test here, due to the
> > permanent kernel bug. A more robust test is:
> >
> > # cmp /dev/dvd /path/to/iso
>
> You can also verify the burn by
>
>sha256s
--- On Sun, 1/31/10, Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 10-01-31 10:12:16, Tim wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 13:50 -0500, Joe Woodruff
> wrote:
> > > Disc's 1 & 3 failed Linux test at
> installation. Burned Disk 1 twice
> > > more and still fails. Went ahead with
> installation.
> >
> > You're asking f
On 10-01-31 10:12:16, Tim wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 13:50 -0500, Joe Woodruff wrote:
> > Disc's 1 & 3 failed Linux test at installation. Burned Disk 1 twice
> > more and still fails. Went ahead with installation.
>
> You're asking for trouble going ahead under that condition. Try and
> reso
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 01:42 +1030, Tim wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 13:50 -0500, Joe Woodruff wrote:
> > Disc's 1 & 3 failed Linux test at installation. Burned Disk 1 twice
> > more and still fails. Went ahead with installation.
>
> You're asking for trouble going ahead under that condition.
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 13:50 -0500, Joe Woodruff wrote:
> Disc's 1 & 3 failed Linux test at installation. Burned Disk 1 twice
> more and still fails. Went ahead with installation.
You're asking for trouble going ahead under that condition. Try and
resolve the failing disc burning issue, first.
B
Joe Woodruff wrote:
> After re-starting computer and logging into root, only get CLI operability
> and can't seem to get a GUI.
Text-mode installs default to not starting X11 by default. After logging in
as root, run:
sed -i -e 's/id:3:initdefault/id:5:initdefault/g' /etc/inittab
Alternatively,
Hi folks,
I've been trying to install Fedora 12 on a Dell Latitude C600, (Pentium III
750/600 MHz; 256 MB RAM; 250 KB Level 2 Cache; 8 MB Video Memory; ATI M3
Video Controller)
Downloaded iso files from Fedora Project, Verified integrity with
sha256sum.exe, burned to 5 CD's. Disc's 1 & 3 failed Li
12 matches
Mail list logo
