Fedora 15 +scsi Solved

2011-10-21 Thread Bill Perry
It appears that my scsi card went bad during the hardware upgrade. Arg! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guideline

Re: Fedora 15 +scsi Solved

2011-10-21 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:10:51 -0700 Bill Perry wrote: > It appears that my scsi card went bad during the hardware upgrade. > > Arg! I'm convinced that hardware just sits around waiting for a software upgrade so it can fail at the most confusing possible time :-). -- users mailing list users@

Re: Fedora 15 +scsi Solved

2011-10-21 Thread Joe Zeff
On 10/21/2011 12:10 PM, Bill Perry wrote: > It appears that my scsi card went bad during the hardware upgrade. > > Arg! Yeah; weird when that happens, isn't it? My sister had a problem with her Ubuntu box refusing to accept DNS numbers. When we tried to use a Live CD to upgrade to 11.10 (a

Re: Fedora 15 +scsi Solved

2011-10-21 Thread Joe Zeff
On 10/21/2011 12:18 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > I'm convinced that hardware just sits around waiting for > a software upgrade so it can fail at the most confusing > possible time :-). Of course it does, it's the AHS/ASS principle: All Hardware Sucks/All Software Sucks. And, I might add, ADS: All Do

Re: Fedora 15 +scsi Solved

2011-10-22 Thread Tim
Bill Perry: >> It appears that my scsi card went bad during the hardware upgrade. >> >> Arg! Tom Horsley: > I'm convinced that hardware just sits around waiting for > a software upgrade so it can fail at the most confusing > possible time :-). It's not too surprising, in some cases... Of

Re: Fedora 15 +scsi Solved

2011-10-23 Thread Bill Davidsen
Tim wrote: > Bill Perry: >>> It appears that my scsi card went bad during the hardware upgrade. >>> >>> Arg! > > Tom Horsley: >> I'm convinced that hardware just sits around waiting for >> a software upgrade so it can fail at the most confusing >> possible time :-). > > It's not too surprising,