On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 09:44 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Michael H. Warfield writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 19:57 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > > Michael H. Warfield writes:
> > > > Fedora 34 and the Fedora 33). All on the same network. All
> > > > with
> > > > the
> > > > same name
Michael H. Warfield writes:
On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 19:57 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Michael H. Warfield writes:
> > Fedora 34 and the Fedora 33). All on the same network. All with
> > the
> > same name servers for resolution.
> > /etc/resolv.conf
> > --
> > # Generated by NetworkManager
On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 23:36 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Actually, it's "-- " and that space matters. Any email clients that
> ignore that are borken.
And there's so few of them... :-p
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.11.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 18 16:34:56 UTC 2020 x86_64
Boilerplate: A
On 1/2/21 9:06 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
First thing. Try not starting a line with "--". Some email client
interpret that as the start of the
signature block and screws up presentation and reply formatting.
Actually, it's "-- " and that space matters. Any email clients that
ignore that are
On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 12:06 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/01/2021 11:52, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> First thing. Try not starting a line with "--". Some email
> client interpret that as the start of the
> signature block and screws up presentation and reply formatting.
That's good to n
On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 12:10 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/01/2021 12:06, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Note, I did try "ping6" to differentiate. Even though there was an
> > IPv6 address, it still failed with "unknown host or service".
> You indicated "I'm fully IPv6 enabled".
Yes. I'm the
On 03/01/2021 12:06, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
Note, I did try "ping6" to differentiate. Even though there was an
IPv6 address, it still failed with "unknown host or service".
You indicated "I'm fully IPv6 enabled".
In that case "ping" and "ping6" would both try IPv6 addresses. So, there is
On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 11:54 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/01/2021 06:30, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > [mhw@rpi-plate ~]$ ping mirrors.fedoraproject.org
> > ping: mirrors.fedoraproject.org: Name or service not known
> > [mhw@rpi-plate ~]$ ping6 mirrors.fedoraproject.org
> > ping6: mirrors.fedor
On 03/01/2021 11:52, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
First thing. Try not starting a line with "--". Some email client
interpret that as the start of the
signature block and screws up presentation and reply formatting.
But no... systemd-resolved is not running and is not
enabled. Not the p
On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 11:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/01/2021 08:57, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > Michael H. Warfield writes:
> >
> > > Fedora 34 and the Fedora 33). All on the same network. All with
> > > the
> > > same name servers for resolution.
> > >
> > > /etc/resolv.conf
> > > --
>
On 03/01/2021 06:30, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
[mhw@rpi-plate ~]$ ping mirrors.fedoraproject.org
ping: mirrors.fedoraproject.org: Name or service not known
[mhw@rpi-plate ~]$ ping6 mirrors.fedoraproject.org
ping6: mirrors.fedoraproject.org: Name or service not known
Just a note here.
If you d
On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 19:57 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Michael H. Warfield writes:
> > Fedora 34 and the Fedora 33). All on the same network. All with
> > the
> > same name servers for resolution.
> > /etc/resolv.conf
> > --
> > # Generated by NetworkManager
> > search wittsend.com
> > nam
On 03/01/2021 08:57, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Michael H. Warfield writes:
Fedora 34 and the Fedora 33). All on the same network. All with the
same name servers for resolution.
/etc/resolv.conf
--
# Generated by NetworkManager
search wittsend.com
nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 1.1.1.1
nameserver
Michael H. Warfield writes:
Fedora 34 and the Fedora 33). All on the same network. All with the
same name servers for resolution.
/etc/resolv.conf
--
# Generated by NetworkManager
search wittsend.com
nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 1.1.1.1
nameserver 10.205.38.3
--
Is /etc/resolv.conf a symli
On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 19:04 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jan 2021 18:18:30 -0500
> Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>
> > Problem is still real.
>
> I doubt it is the same issue, but I had DNS go out on my phone
> the other day, and eventually (after much confusion) discovered
> that the DNS
On Sat, 02 Jan 2021 18:18:30 -0500
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Problem is still real.
I doubt it is the same issue, but I had DNS go out on my phone
the other day, and eventually (after much confusion) discovered
that the DNS info in my router wasn't saved when I upgraded the
firmware, so when i
Sorry... Getting confused in my old age...
s/33/32/g
s/34/33/g
Got my revs out of sink. Problem is still real. Trying the trick of
beating NetworkManager into submission with "dns=none" I pulled off
this list.
Thanks!
Regards,
Mike
On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 17:30 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrot
I'm not even sure what to file a bug against. This makes no sense to
me.
I have four Raspberry Pi's on Fedora 34. One RPi4 and Three RPi3s, all
running aarch 64. I also have numerous other RPi's on Fedora 33
aarch64 that are running just fine, parallel configurations. I'm not
upgrading any of
18 matches
Mail list logo
