GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-01 Thread Bill Davidsen
Now that MINT has both a GNOME2 port and ax extension (plugin, whatever) for GNOME3 to make it usable without user retraining, will these features be available in Fedora17, or has the move to kill GNOME2 become a holy war. We support RHEL6 installations, and in addition to training time and app

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-01 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Now that MINT has both a GNOME2 port and ax extension (plugin, whatever) for > GNOME3 to make it usable without user retraining, will these features be > available in Fedora17, or has the move to kill GNOME2 become a holy war. There is nothi

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-01 Thread Bill Davidsen
T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Now that MINT has both a GNOME2 port and ax extension (plugin, whatever) for >> GNOME3 to make it usable without user retraining, will these features be >> available in Fedora17, or has the move to kill GNOME2 bec

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-01 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > What did I say which in any way referenced RHEL7? We are running Fedora on our > support machines (not the servers) and my question was pretty specific as to > FC17 being the issue, so we can get off FC14. Sorry, I thought you were talking ab

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-01 Thread Genes MailLists
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> What did I say which in any way referenced RHEL7? We are running Fedora on >> our >> support machines (not the servers) and my question was pretty specific as to >> FC17 being the issue, so we can get off FC14. > Seems you have some c

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-02 Thread Frank Murphy
On 01/12/11 19:49, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Now that MINT has both a GNOME2 port and ax extension (plugin, whatever) for > GNOME3 to make it usable without user retraining, will these features be > available in Fedora17, or has the move to kill GNOME2 become a holy war. I don't believe the Fedora ma

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-02 Thread Olav Vitters
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:49:30PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Now that MINT has both a GNOME2 port and ax extension (plugin, whatever) for > GNOME3 to make it usable without user retraining, will these features be > available in Fedora17, or has the move to kill GNOME2 become a holy war. Sugg

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-03 Thread Bill Davidsen
Olav Vitters wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:49:30PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Now that MINT has both a GNOME2 port and ax extension (plugin, whatever) for >> GNOME3 to make it usable without user retraining, will these features be >> available in Fedora17, or has the move to kill GNOME2 b

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-03 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:29:49PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > That's a good idea, I think it represents a minimal effort to ask, and would > be > a start. But I think the GNOME2 stack is desirable, there's a lot of stuff > depending on that mindset. Not sure why you bring up GNOME 2 to me, t