Hi Bill
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 23:35 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> William Case wrote:
> > Hi Terry;
> > On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:01 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 12:53 -0400, William Case wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:46 -0400, William Case wrote:
> >> Just curious w
William Case wrote:
> Hi Terry;
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:01 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 12:53 -0400, William Case wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:46 -0400, William Case wrote:
>> Just curious what do you do to get audio?
>
> I don't get audio. After futzing about for
Hi Terry;
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:01 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 12:53 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:46 -0400, William Case wrote:
> Just curious what do you do to get audio?
I don't get audio. After futzing about for a long while, submitting
bugs
On 02/09/10 02:53, William Case wrote:
> My video has returned in full glorious colour after my latest upgrade
...
> Updated: xorg-x11-xinit-1.0.9-18.fc13.x86_64
> Installed: kernel-2.6.34.6-47.fc13.x86_64
.. are my guesses. rpm -q --changelog on each one.
you might be able to tell if it was only
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 12:53 -0400, William Case wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:46 -0400, William Case wrote:
Just curious what do you do to get audio?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:46 -0400, William Case wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I have a Hauppauge WinTv-HVR 1800 tuner with an analog Cable TV (NTSC -
> Canada). In F12 I received a near perfect video picture from my cable
> TV. In F13, the picture is black and white with various degrees of
> interference lin
On 27/08/10 10:09, Michael Miles wrote:
> Just to see if it is a problem with tvtime and F13
I'm assuming it's reception of the signal that you are having trouble with.
But if it's the output, it could be that the output is set for YC
(s-video), but you have only the composite video connected (or
William Case wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 12:30 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
>
>> William Case wrote:
>>
>>> Hi;
>>>
>>> I have a Hauppauge WinTv-HVR 1800 tuner with an analog Cable TV (NTSC -
>>> Canada). In F12 I received a near perfect video picture from my cable
>>> TV. In F13, the
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 12:30 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
> William Case wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > I have a Hauppauge WinTv-HVR 1800 tuner with an analog Cable TV (NTSC -
> > Canada). In F12 I received a near perfect video picture from my cable
> > TV. In F13, the picture is black and white with vario
William Case wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I have a Hauppauge WinTv-HVR 1800 tuner with an analog Cable TV (NTSC -
> Canada). In F12 I received a near perfect video picture from my cable
> TV. In F13, the picture is black and white with various degrees of
> interference lines depending on the tv channel.
>
>
Hi;
I have a Hauppauge WinTv-HVR 1800 tuner with an analog Cable TV (NTSC -
Canada). In F12 I received a near perfect video picture from my cable
TV. In F13, the picture is black and white with various degrees of
interference lines depending on the tv channel.
I have played with (used) TVTime q
On 05/30/2010 01:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> Supposedly /boot cannot be ext4 as it's not yet supported by Grub, so I
> don't know how you got that to work.
>
Till Fedora 11, this was the case. Fedora 12 onwards can support Ext4
in a boot partition because GRUB has been patched to sup
On 05/30/2010 12:10 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Definitely. Best back up /home and create a new partition once and for
> all. While you're at it, make sure /boot is at least 500MB in case you
> want to use preupgrade in the future.
>
FYI, /boot is 500 MB by default in Fedora 13, precisely
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:38:33 +0100,
N James Bridge wrote:
>
> nouveau does not support compiz, so no desktop effects, but you can live
> without them. On the plus side, dvds play perfectly in totem (but you
You can try installing mesa-dri-drivers-experimental which will turn on
3d support
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sunday 30 May 2010 03:53 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Suvayu Ali
>> wrote:
>>> On Saturday 29 May 2010 12:33 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:06 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
>
> Sda
On Sunday 30 May 2010 03:53 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Suvayu Ali
> wrote:
>> On Saturday 29 May 2010 12:33 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:06 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
Sda1 ext4 /boot is 200 meg and locked, Will not allow me to do
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Saturday 29 May 2010 12:33 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:06 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
>>>
>>> Sda1 ext4 /boot is 200 meg and locked, Will not allow me to do anything
>>> except format
>>
>> Supposedly /boot cann
On Saturday 29 May 2010 12:33 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:06 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
>>
>> Sda1 ext4 /boot is 200 meg and locked, Will not allow me to do anything
>> except format
>
> Supposedly /boot cannot be ext4 as it's not yet supported by Grub, so I
> don't k
On Sun, 30 May 2010, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 08:19 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 May 2010, N James Bridge wrote:
>>
>>> Personally, I prefer to do a clean install, since it gets rid of
>>> accumulated clutter. That assumes you have a convenient way of back
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 08:19 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Sun, 30 May 2010, N James Bridge wrote:
>
> > Personally, I prefer to do a clean install, since it gets rid of
> > accumulated clutter. That assumes you have a convenient way of backing
> > up your /home directory.
>
> I back up rega
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 08:29 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Sun, 30 May 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> > Why can't they just admit that LVM is a bad idea?
> > It belongs to a past age when disk-space was limited.
>
> LVM is probably useful.
> That said, I was innoculated against its virtues
On Sun, 30 May 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Why can't they just admit that LVM is a bad idea?
> It belongs to a past age when disk-space was limited.
LVM is probably useful.
That said, I was innoculated against its virtues when
it was sprung on me as a surprise during an install.
If one has *on
On Sun, 30 May 2010, N James Bridge wrote:
> Personally, I prefer to do a clean install, since it gets rid of
> accumulated clutter. That assumes you have a convenient way of backing
> up your /home directory.
I back up regardless.
If you have a /home partition and do a custom install,
you can te
On 30/05/10 13:12, Timothy Murphy wrote:
--snip--
>
> Does the default installation destroy one's /home partition?
> I learned a long time ago never to let Fedora touch my partitioning.
> Why can't they just admit that LVM is a bad idea?
> It belongs to a past age when disk-space was limited.
>
I
N James Bridge wrote:
> Personally, I prefer to do a clean install, since it gets rid of
> accumulated clutter. That assumes you have a convenient way of backing
> up your /home directory.
Does the default installation destroy one's /home partition?
I learned a long time ago never to let Fedora t
I have just done a clean install of F13 86_64 and it has worked more
smoothly than ever before. The default installation creates a 500 MB
boot partition (ext4), as well as root and home. It's worth reviewing
the sizes because it gives equal shares to these two and you may well
want more for /home.
On 05/29/2010 03:37 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 15:49 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>
>>> Supposedly /boot cannot be ext4 as it's not yet supported by Grub,
>>>
>> so I
>>
>>> don't know how you got that to work.
>>>
>>>
>> It iis my impresssion th
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 15:49 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > Supposedly /boot cannot be ext4 as it's not yet supported by Grub,
> so I
> > don't know how you got that to work.
> >
> It iis my impresssion that the abovve is no longer true.
It seems so. It can't be Btrfs but ext4 isn't explicitly f
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 15:03 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:06 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
> > On 05/29/2010 11:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 11:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
> > >
> > >> I would like to install F13 x64
> > >>
> > >
On 05/29/2010 12:33 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:06 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
>
>> On 05/29/2010 11:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 11:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
>>>
>>>
I would like to install F13 x64
>>>
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:06 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
> On 05/29/2010 11:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 11:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to install F13 x64
> >>
> >> I have seen the size difference in the partitions.
> >> Question: Do I have
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 11:44 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
> On 05/29/2010 11:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 11:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to install F13 x64
> >>
> >> I have seen the size difference in the partitions.
> >> Question: Do I have
On 05/29/2010 11:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 11:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
>
>> I would like to install F13 x64
>>
>> I have seen the size difference in the partitions.
>> Question: Do I have to reformat my F12 installation or will upgrade
>> resize the boot pa
On 05/29/2010 11:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 11:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
>
>> I would like to install F13 x64
>>
>> I have seen the size difference in the partitions.
>> Question: Do I have to reformat my F12 installation or will upgrade
>> resize the boot pa
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 11:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
> I would like to install F13 x64
>
> I have seen the size difference in the partitions.
> Question: Do I have to reformat my F12 installation or will upgrade
> resize the boot partition?
Is your current F12 installation 32-bit or 64-bit? I
I would like to install F13 x64
I have seen the size difference in the partitions.
Question: Do I have to reformat my F12 installation or will upgrade
resize the boot partition?
I did not select a seperate Home partition when I installed F12. I
realize now I should have.
--
users mailing
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 08:42 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> Any body had any luck installing i386 version of F13 Alpha?
>
> I tried to install it on my Dell Inspiron 8600 laptop and it crashes
> just after checking the hardware and before it asks to check the
> media. I have tried this twice now a
Any body had any luck installing i386 version of F13 Alpha?
I tried to install it on my Dell Inspiron 8600 laptop and it crashes just
after checking the hardware and before it asks to check the media. I have
tried this twice now and it has crashed both times. This system is
currently running F12
38 matches
Mail list logo
