On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 17:58 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> And then if you're still feeling industrious by the time all of this
>> is done, tomorrow there will be a 4.2.0.rc5 build to test against and
>> you can report whether it implode
On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 17:58 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Is this a 32-bit system by any chance?
>
> Duh. Subject.
Right.
> If you know or are willing to learn how to setup netconsole you might
> be able to capture the call trace for a bug report (I just attach the
> entire thing I collect rath
> Is this a 32-bit system by any chance?
Duh. Subject.
If you know or are willing to learn how to setup netconsole you might
be able to capture the call trace for a bug report (I just attach the
entire thing I collect rather than "snipping here"). Switching to a
debug version of the problem kerne
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 16:13 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> > I'll try updating again tomorrow before I report anything.
>>
>> That sort of inconsistency leads one to suspect a hardware issue.
>> Perhaps a fan that's not running so things
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 16:13 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> > I'll try updating again tomorrow before I report anything.
>
> That sort of inconsistency leads one to suspect a hardware issue.
> Perhaps a fan that's not running so things are too hot, a power
> supply
> that's dying, dirty memory conne
hmm. I don't know if I'm in the same experience or not. I'm running
fedora 21 and upgraded to kernel 4.0.8 from 4.0.7 on 7/19. I didn't
have any issues until about the 26th. But then my system started to
lock up. It wasn't just GNOME but direct access was locked -- ie no
response via keyboard,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 13:21 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:54:02 +0100 "Patrick O'Callaghan" <
>> pocallag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > This is happening every few minutes since I updated today:
>> >
>> > Jul 30 1
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 16:13 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 03:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 13:21 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > > On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:54:02 +0100 "Patrick O'Callaghan" <
> > > pocallag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is happeni
On 07/30/2015 03:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 13:21 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:54:02 +0100 "Patrick O'Callaghan" <
pocallag...@gmail.com> wrote:
This is happening every few minutes since I updated today:
Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: BUG: unab
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 13:21 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:54:02 +0100 "Patrick O'Callaghan" <
> pocallag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is happening every few minutes since I updated today:
> >
> > Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
> > pointer
Hello Ranjan,
Yes I'm Real. To prove I'm real first off.. You are Ranjan Maitra and your
mail Id users@lists.fedoraproject.org
I was just taking a quick shower and I heard my phone vibrate, my hair isnt
even close to being dry yet but I wanted to quickly check my email to see if it
was you wr
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:54:02 +0100 "Patrick O'Callaghan"
wrote:
> This is happening every few minutes since I updated today:
>
> Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
> dereference at 0288
> Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: IP: []
> __kmalloc_node_trac
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> This is happening every few minutes since I updated today:
>
> Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
> dereference at 0288
> Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: IP: []
> __kmalloc_node_track_call
This is happening every few minutes since I updated today:
Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at 0288
Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: IP: []
__kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1c4/0x320
Going to try booting the previous kernel.
poc
--
users
14 matches
Mail list logo
