On 07/07/15 05:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
A mystery worked around ...
>
>Thanks for the help,
>
You're welcome
I should have added that once that worked I would move back the extensions and
plugins directories back to their original position, one by one, to see if the
problem returns.
.
I
On 07/07/15 17:24, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
>
> On 07/07/15 05:02, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> >I created a new user, rfg, and Firefox appears to work normally with
>>> >images, the weatherunderground Norfolk radar is good again. However using
>>> >a new user entails more reconfigurat
On 07/07/15 05:02, Ed Greshko wrote:
>I created a new user, rfg, and Firefox appears to work normally with images,
the weatherunderground Norfolk radar is good again. However using a new user
entails more reconfiguration than I wanted. It would be better to remove the
update triggering the p
On 07/07/15 16:55, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
>
> On 06/07/15 21:46, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/07/15 09:34, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>>> >My question is which of the updates has made this change and can I undo it?
>> Fully updated system, with the same versions you'
On 06/07/15 21:46, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/07/15 09:34, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>My question is which of the updates has made this change and can I undo it?
Fully updated system, with the same versions you've shown and I can use FF and
go tohttp://www.foxnews.com/ with no i
On 07/07/15 09:34, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> My question is which of the updates has made this change and can I undo it?
Fully updated system, with the same versions you've shown and I can use FF and
go to http://www.foxnews.com/ with no issues.
Have you logged in as a differen
This morning's DNF update did the following:
Upgrading:
bash x86_64 4.3.39-3.fc22
updates 1.6 M
file-roller x86_64 3.16.3-1.fc22
updates 911 k
file-roller-nautilus x86_64 3.16.3-1.fc22
updat
