Well,
Which one do you prefer? And Why?
For me, I seem to prefer KDE more :-)
--
Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor
Core Developer Intern, Diaspora http://joindiaspora.com
Twitter - @Nirjhor http://twitter.com/nirjhor
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/12 13:00, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Mobile 'ish Desktop (Read GNOME 3) vs Traditional Desktop
(Read KDE
I have gone the XFCE route, but failing that I would have picked the KDE
route.
Joe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
On 04/03/2012 08:03 PM, Joe Feely wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/12 13:00, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Mobile 'ish Desktop (Read GNOME 3) vs Traditional Desktop
(Read KDE
I have gone the XFCE route, but failing that I would have picked
Which one do you prefer? And Why?
GNOME 3 for sure! I am always very open to new concepts and GNOME 3's
fits my requirements better then every other Desktop did before. Some
reasons are:
• Quick and easy to use with both mouse/touchpad and keyboard
• Looks awesome (this is personal taste of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2012 08:03 PM, Joe Feely wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/12 13:00, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Mobile 'ish Desktop (Read GNOME 3) vs Traditional Desktop
(Read KDE
I have gone the XFCE
On 04/03/2012 10:28 PM, chritallic wrote:
For me, I seem to prefer KDE more :-)
… and your reason is? ;-)
The integration and sticking to the traditional Desktop as we know it.
Also, some sympathy for KDE I guess :-)
--
Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor
Core Developer Intern, Diaspora
On 04/03/2012 11:47 AM, Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor wrote:
Well,
Which one do you prefer? And Why?
This either/or and this one size fits all notion behind it doesn't
make actual sense.
There are use cases where what you call Mobilish Desktops are better
suitable and there are use-case where
