On 5/11/19 3:40 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
[bobg@bobg bobg]$ sudo tcptraceroute 118.214.253.200
[sudo] password for bobg:
Running:
traceroute -T -O info 118.214.253.200
traceroute to 118.214.253.200 (118.214.253.200), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 router.viasatmodem.com (192.168.1.1) 0.35
On 5/12/19 6:40 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 05/11/19 18:31, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> That "probably" is it. But just for completeness, what do you get for...
>>
>> sudo tcptraceroute 118.214.253.200
> .
> Supper time here, gotta go ...
>
> [bobg@bobg bobg]$ sudo tcptraceroute 118.214.253.200
> [
On 05/11/19 18:31, Ed Greshko wrote:
That "probably" is it. But just for completeness, what do you get for...
sudo tcptraceroute 118.214.253.200
.
Supper time here, gotta go ...
[bobg@bobg bobg]$ sudo tcptraceroute 118.214.253.200
[sudo] password for bobg:
Running:
traceroute -T -O in
On 5/12/19 5:26 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 05/11/19 17:16, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 5/12/19 4:49 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/09/19 07:23, Ed Greshko wrote:
Your Viasat Modem has 2 interfaces. The interface that connects to the
Radio Equipment,
does it have an IP addres
On 05/11/19 17:16, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 5/12/19 4:49 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 05/09/19 07:23, Ed Greshko wrote:
Your Viasat Modem has 2 interfaces. The interface that connects to the Radio
Equipment,
does it have an IP address? Do you know what it is?
.
No, I've decided that I probably
On 5/12/19 4:49 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 05/09/19 07:23, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Your Viasat Modem has 2 interfaces. The interface that connects to the
>> Radio Equipment,
>> does it have an IP address? Do you know what it is?
> .
> No, I've decided that I probably don't know what that addre
On 05/09/19 07:23, Ed Greshko wrote:
Your Viasat Modem has 2 interfaces. The interface that connects to the Radio
Equipment,
does it have an IP address? Do you know what it is?
.
No, I've decided that I probably don't know what that address is. I set
out assuming it was 192.168.1.1 like it
Tim:
>> Because most ISPs will only assign one IP to each customer.
Ed Greshko:
> My ISP gave me 4722366482869645213696 IP addresses.
>
> OK, they are IPv6 addresses. :-) :-)
Aussie ISPs are still dragging their feet on supporting IPv6. They
should have been getting it ready MANY years ago.
_
On 5/10/19 1:25 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> Because most ISPs will only assign one IP to each customer.
My ISP gave me 4722366482869645213696 IP addresses.
OK, they are IPv6 addresses. :-) :-)
--
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default
color scheme
__
On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 15:14 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 05/09/19 07:23, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > So, your network kinda looks like the attached. (no switch in my
> > diagram)
> >
> > Your Viasat Modem has 2 interfaces. The interface that connects to
> > the Radio Equipment,
> > does it have a
On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 15:14 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> If I put the viasat unit into it's bridged mode I would expect output
> as 182.168.1.1 but not sure of that.
If you put it into bridge mode, it'll have the public IP that the ISP
assigns to you (previously that IP would have just been interna
On 5/9/19 12:14 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
It's not clear to me how this could work? I have an identical ASUS
router in the barn set up as a bridge and it seems useless for anything
else. I know that I can't access it's browser set up function without
bringing it in here and plugging a cat5 cable i
On 5/10/19 8:28 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 10May2019 07:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 5/10/19 2:01 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>> On 5/9/19 4:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of
the ASUS was
something like 192.168.1.5 and
On 10May2019 07:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 5/10/19 2:01 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/9/19 4:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of the
ASUS was
something like 192.168.1.5 and I would run the ASUS in Bridge mode.
This way everything on yo
On 5/10/19 2:01 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/9/19 4:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of the
>> ASUS was
>> something like 192.168.1.5 and I would run the ASUS in Bridge mode.
>>
>> This way everything on your network could have IP ad
On 05/09/19 07:23, Ed Greshko wrote:
So, your network kinda looks like the attached. (no switch in my diagram)
Your Viasat Modem has 2 interfaces. The interface that connects to the Radio
Equipment,
does it have an IP address? Do you know what it is? And the second interface
connects to
On 5/9/19 4:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of the
ASUS was
something like 192.168.1.5 and I would run the ASUS in Bridge mode.
This way everything on your network could have IP addresses of 192.168.1.X
There should be no reason to
Allegedly, on or about 9 May 2019, Bob Goodwin sent:
> Everything I have read says Viasat's equipment must be used. ... It
> also contains a voip adapter for the telephone, before this "system
> upgrade" two months ago that was separate.
If it's a standard VOIP thing, then you probably can continu
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 07:21, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 05/07/19 20:17, Tony Su wrote:
> > I've posted several times over the past 8 months or so about the
> > equipment I've been using on Cox and Spectrum, I don't even have to
> > tell the ISP what equipment I'm using... I just tell them I'm us
On 5/9/19 6:43 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 05/09/19 06:29, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Wasn't it pointed out quite some time ago that 2 devices can't have the same
>> IP address?
>>
>> You show your Viasat Modem and ASUS Router as both having 192.168.1.1.
> .
> Yes and understood. The diagram simply
On 05/09/19 06:29, Ed Greshko wrote:
Wasn't it pointed out quite some time ago that 2 devices can't have the same IP
address?
You show your Viasat Modem and ASUS Router as both having 192.168.1.1.
.
Yes and understood. The diagram simply shows what I have to start with,
the new router/modem
On 5/9/19 6:20 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Any further suggestions appreciated
Wasn't it pointed out quite some time ago that 2 devices can't have the same IP
address?
You show your Viasat Modem and ASUS Router as both having 192.168.1.1.
--
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What
On 05/07/19 20:17, Tony Su wrote:
I've posted several times over the past 8 months or so about the
equipment I've been using on Cox and Spectrum, I don't even have to
tell the ISP what equipment I'm using... I just tell them I'm using my
own equipment on the Service Order, then hook up my own e
I also endorse using your own equipment although some equipment might
be a little bit of an adventure.
I've posted several times over the past 8 months or so about the
equipment I've been using on Cox and Spectrum, I don't even have to
tell the ISP what equipment I'm using... I just tell them I'm
On 04/21/19 16:46, Samuel Sieb wrote:
emorable ...
That is a different "bridged mode" than what we've been referring to.
If you can't set the modem to bridged mode, then you need to change
it's IP subnet to something other than 192.168.1.0/24. If the modem
and your router are both using t
On 4/21/19 10:56 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 04/21/19 13:19, Mike Wright wrote:
Basically it will say the same thing. Put your Viasat modem/router
into BRIDGED mode. That's all you have to do.
.
Mike, I would be happy to do that but I have gone over the Viasat router
configuration menus and f
On 04/21/19 13:19, Mike Wright wrote:
Basically it will say the same thing. Put your Viasat modem/router
into BRIDGED mode. That's all you have to do.
.
.
Mike, I would be happy to do that but I have gone over the Viasat router
configuration menus and found nothing to select Bridged mode.
On 4/21/19 10:19 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
On 4/21/19 8:10 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
my router at 192.168.1.1 and the Viasat router uses 192.168.1.1 also.
Hi Bob,
Therein lies your problem. You can continue to use your original setup
if you configure your Viasat router correctly. There is no re
On 4/21/19 8:10 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
my router at 192.168.1.1 and the Viasat router uses 192.168.1.1 also.
Hi Bob,
Therein lies your problem. You can continue to use your original setup
if you configure your Viasat router correctly. There is no reason to
keep beating your head against a
On Sun, 2019-04-21 at 11:10 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I have cameras and another ASUS router set up in the barn and all
> that stuff will need to be reconfigured if I change the
> address range.
Third option, then: Put a switch after the ISP's modem/router, and
plug everything that you trust n
On 04/20/19 22:06, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On this computer NM shows 192.168.122.1 initially, the other one I
have been using ...124.1
If this is the address you are seeing on your computer, then you're
probably looking at virbr0 which is the virtual bridge interface used
by libvirtd for virtua
Tim:
>> If you could put the ISP supplied thingummy into bridge mode, it
>> would act simply as a modem, giving a bare ethernet output to your
>> own router.
See this diagram:
https://pasteboard.co/Ib7teuG.png
The upper three boxes show what we think your current situation is.
Internal to the IS
On 4/20/19 4:38 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
. I would answer yes to all those questions ... On this computer NM
shows 192.168.122.1 initially, the other one I have been using ...124.1
If this is the address you are seeing on your computer, then you're
probably looking at virbr0 which is the virtua
On 04/20/19 15:54, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Is this device you have shaped like a triangular prism?
According to the little information I've been able to find, the viasat
gateway should be at 192.168.100.1. But it's not clear, so what IP
address does your computer get when it's connected to the
On 4/20/19 8:34 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have found nothing in the settings indicating that option is
available. NetworkManager shows two connection options, Ethernet (eno1)
virbr0, I have it running at the eno1 and a fixed ipaddress on this
computer, that works, the other never did where it wo
On 4/20/19 6:40 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 04/19/19 21:04, Samuel Sieb wrote:
That's not what you want. I don't know why you're trying to make a
network bridge on your computer.
.
Ok, I can accept that based on you greater knowledge, but what's in a
name? I want to connect a wide area networ
supplied > your own ---+-> the
receiver horrible preferred | rest
modem & router router +> of
doing NAT also doing NAT | your
Is this of any help?
http://wildbluetools.com/content/FS/110/111/I12000_EnableDisableBridgeModemSB2PlusModem.pdf
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of C
the
receiverhorrible preferred|rest
modem & router router +> of
doing NAT also doing NAT |your
+--->LAN
Yes that is e
-> the
receiverhorrible preferred | rest
modem & router router +> of
doing NAT also doing NAT |your
+--->LAN
With the ISP-supplied modem rou
On 04/19/19 21:04, Samuel Sieb wrote:
That's not what you want. I don't know why you're trying to make a
network bridge on your computer.
.
Ok, I can accept that based on you greater knowledge, but what's in a
name? I want to connect a wide area network to a local area network but
a network
On 4/19/19 11:42 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 04/16/19 16:01, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/16/19 12:59 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
According to everything I've found it should work with their modem
feeding mine but I can't seem to get it working with the reworked
modem I am using so I ordered a new one whi
On 04/16/19 16:01, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/16/19 12:59 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
According to everything I've found it should work with their modem
feeding mine but I can't seem to get it working with the reworked
modem I am using so I ordered a new one which should be here tomorrow
and intend
On 04/16/19 16:01, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Did you check the IP subnets?
.
Yes, and in desperation I just changed my router back to 192.168.1.1,
same as isp router, I had it at 192.168.0.1 which seems like it should
be to differentiate them?
Also setting up the NAT is complicated, and taxiing m
On 4/16/19 12:59 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
According to everything I've found it should work with their modem
feeding mine but I can't seem to get it working with the reworked modem
I am using so I ordered a new one which should be here tomorrow and
intend to try that. I hesitate to reset mine to
On 04/15/19 17:51, Mike Chambers wrote:
Do you have to use their modems? I have been on ATT, charter, and now
spectrum (all same thing just diff business bought them out), and I've
been using my own model for years now, and I don't have to pay a
monthly fee. I just called and gave them my in
On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 17:12 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> .
> I have a new problem with my internet connection which a few others
> on
> this list may have encountered. They [Viasat] replaced the modem and
> antenna in upgrading the system. The new modem has an integral
> router
> having none of t
On 4/15/19 1:08 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Initially the ISP feed was into the WAN port on my dd-wrt router a [a
system I have been using for 13 years] and nothing was reaching the LAN,
wired or wifi. Normally the router feeds a 16 port switch that connects
What IP range are you using on your rou
On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 04:08 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Initially the ISP feed was into the WAN port on my dd-wrt router a
> [a system I have been using for 13 years] and nothing was reaching
> the LAN, wired or wifi. Normally the router feeds a 16 port switch
> that connects the equipment on my wi
On 04/14/19 20:37, Samuel Sieb wrote:
You could turn off dhcp on your router and then connect through the
LAN ports, but that's not what your original email indicated that you
wanted.
Connect only the WAN port on your router to one of the ethernet ports
on the modem. Leave the rest of your n
Samuel Sieb:
>> If you can't disable the wifi on the modem, then you can just
>> ignore it. Connect the WAN port on your router to the ethernet
>> port on the modem. You end up with double NAT, but it should still
>> work.
Bob Goodwin:
> Yeah, I think it's a poor design for the application, I
>
> As mentioned, my solution has been to log into to their router, change to
> bridged (usually had a simple pass through setting), then built my own
> network. Should kill the WiFi at that point as well if memory serves me
> right.
___
users mailing lis
Tim:
>> If you did things like SSH in from the outside world, or accept
>> other incoming connections, then you will strike problems. Their
>> equipment would act as a firewall. That's why people say put it
>> into bridge mode, then it's virtually transparent.
Joe Zeff:
> You should be able to t
On 4/14/19 3:41 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 04/14/19 17:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
If you can't disable the wifi on the modem, then you can just ignore
it. Connect the WAN port on your router to the ethernet port on the
modem. You end up with double NAT, but it should still work.
.
Yeah, I thin
On 04/14/2019 06:00 PM, Tim via users wrote:
If you did things like SSH in from the outside world, or accept other
incoming connections, then you will strike problems. Their equipment
would act as a firewall. That's why people say put it into bridge
mode, then it's virtually transparent.
You
On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 17:12 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> The problem is feeding their router data through my DD-WRT router.
> An ethernet port is provided which they claim work but provide no
> information for doing so. They sent a "technician" a few days ago and
> he knew nothing more about it tha
On 14Apr2019 18:41, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 04/14/19 17:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
If you can't disable the wifi on the modem, then you can just ignore
it. Connect the WAN port on your router to the ethernet port on the
modem. You end up with double NAT, but it should still work.
.
Yeah, I think
Please ignore that message.
-Original Message-
From:
Sent: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 23:10:05 + (UTC)
To: 3603060...@txt.att.net
Subject: RE: Re: Modem/Router/Router -
>ON @kingstontech
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
> Sent: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 19:04:47 -0400
ON @kingstontech
-Original Message-
From:
Sent: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 19:04:47 -0400
To: 3603060...@txt.att.net
Subject: Re: Modem/Router/Router -
>On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 06:41:14PM -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/14/19 17:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 06:41:14PM -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 04/14/19 17:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >
> >If you can't disable the wifi on the modem, then you can just
> >ignore it. Connect the WAN port on your router to the ethernet
> >port on the modem. You end up with double NAT, but i
On 04/14/19 17:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
If you can't disable the wifi on the modem, then you can just ignore
it. Connect the WAN port on your router to the ethernet port on the
modem. You end up with double NAT, but it should still work.
.
Yeah, I think it's a poor design for the applicati
On 4/14/19 2:12 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have a new problem with my internet connection which a few others on
this list may have encountered. They [Viasat] replaced the modem and
antenna in upgrading the system. The new modem has an integral router
having none of the feature I need to manage da
.
I have a new problem with my internet connection which a few others on
this list may have encountered. They [Viasat] replaced the modem and
antenna in upgrading the system. The new modem has an integral router
having none of the feature I need to manage data usage, I've already
used more tha
63 matches
Mail list logo
