Re: NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-17 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:16:16 -0500 Tom Horsley wrote: > I guess I'll poke around some more and see if I can figure > out what the delay is all about. Ah-HA! Need to turn off STP on the bridge: nmcli con modify br0 bridge.stp no The original web page mentioned I could do that, but didn't say

Re: NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-17 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 17:53:59 -0500 Tom Horsley wrote: > > # nmcli con mod net-eth0 ipv4.ignore-auto-dns yes > > Sounds like what I want, I've just resurrected an old > system and installed f31 so I can try experimenting > with network manager. I'll see how it goes. Thanks. I've been

Re: NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-17 Thread Tom H
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 8:37 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > > I keep seeing signs that "network" will someday disappear > entirely and I'll be forced to use NetworkManager, so the > first question I haven't been able to find an answer > for: > > What is the "proper" way to setup a network connection >

Re: NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-16 Thread Tim via users
On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 19:55 -0600, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote: > There is no technical reason for AT to lock this down. I might > understand this for the VOIP and IPTV segments of the gateway. Those > probably have very complex and proprietary DHCP configurations. But > for the Internet

Re: NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-16 Thread Robert G (Doc) Savage via users
On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 19:22 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 02/16/2020 06:55 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote: > > U-verse does not allow the user to change the Primary DNS address > > on the > > residential gateway's DHCP configuration page. It is hard-coded to > > 192.168.1.254, which is

Re: NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-16 Thread Joe Zeff
On 02/16/2020 06:55 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote: U-verse does not allow the user to change the Primary DNS address on the residential gateway's DHCP configuration page. It is hard-coded to 192.168.1.254, which is the gateway itself. I want to change that to 192.168.1.1 which is

Re: NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-16 Thread Robert G (Doc) Savage via users
On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 14:43 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 02/16/2020 02:39 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote: > > AT U-verse customers are forced to use the DNS service in their > > residential gateway, which would be fine for IPTV and VOIP > > sessions. > > How? Does the router block

Re: NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-16 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 06:47:42 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > # nmcli con mod net-eth0 ipv4.ignore-auto-dns yes Sounds like what I want, I've just resurrected an old system and installed f31 so I can try experimenting with network manager. I'll see how it goes. Thanks.

Re: NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-16 Thread Ed Greshko
On 2020-02-17 03:36, Tom Horsley wrote: > I keep seeing signs that "network" will someday disappear > entirely and I'll be forced to use NetworkManager, so the > first question I haven't been able to find an answer > for: > > What is the "proper" way to setup a network connection > using nmcli

Re: NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-16 Thread Joe Zeff
On 02/16/2020 02:39 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote: AT U-verse customers are forced to use the DNS service in their residential gateway, which would be fine for IPTV and VOIP sessions. How? Does the router block outgoing DNS requests? ___

Re: NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-16 Thread Robert G (Doc) Savage via users
I would like to know the answer to this also, but probably for a different reason. AT U-verse customers are forced to use the DNS service in their residential gateway, which would be fine for IPTV and VOIP sessions. However, if I want to install a Raspberry Pi device running Pi-Hole as my primary

Re: NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-16 Thread stan via users
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 14:36:42 -0500 Tom Horsley wrote: > I keep seeing signs that "network" will someday disappear > entirely and I'll be forced to use NetworkManager, so the > first question I haven't been able to find an answer > for: > > What is the "proper" way to setup a network connection

NetworkManager and PEERDNS=no

2020-02-16 Thread Tom Horsley
I keep seeing signs that "network" will someday disappear entirely and I'll be forced to use NetworkManager, so the first question I haven't been able to find an answer for: What is the "proper" way to setup a network connection using nmcli which will get an IP via DHCP, but will ignore the DHCP