Re: OOo 3.2 for F12?

2010-04-30 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Friday 30 April 2010 04:54 AM, Kirk Lowery wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Suvayu Ali > wrote: >> On Thursday 29 April 2010 12:03 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >>> I would spend a few minutes downloading the F13 rpms and attempting >>> some "rpm --test -Uhv" commands. >>> >> >> Or just c

Re: OOo 3.2 for F12?

2010-04-30 Thread Kirk Lowery
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Thursday 29 April 2010 12:03 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >> I would spend a few minutes downloading the F13 rpms and attempting >> some "rpm --test -Uhv" commands. >> > > Or just create a repo file for F13 and do, > > # yum --enablerepo Fedora-

Re: OOo 3.2 for F12?

2010-04-29 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Thursday 29 April 2010 12:03 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > I would spend a few minutes downloading the F13 rpms and attempting > some "rpm --test -Uhv" commands. > Or just create a repo file for F13 and do, # yum --enablerepo Fedora-13 update openoffice.org\* That way yum handles the deps and t

Re: OOo 3.2 for F12?

2010-04-29 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Kirk Lowery wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan > Having OOo 3.2 is not mission critical. But it would be *very* > convenient. That's why I was wondering if there is a set of rpms that > could be used which were competently built that would not mess up my > F12 install; o

Re: OOo 3.2 for F12?

2010-04-29 Thread Kirk Lowery
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Mohamed El Morabity wrote: > > > 2010/4/29 Kirk Lowery >> >> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 08:24 -0400, Kirk Lowery wrote: >> >> After googling around, it seems that OpenOffice 3.2 won't be >> >> offici

Re: OOo 3.2 for F12?

2010-04-29 Thread mike cloaked
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 08:24 -0400, Kirk Lowery wrote: >> After googling around, it seems that OpenOffice 3.2 won't be >> officially packaged for Fedora 12. I really would like to upgrade to >> it because 3.2 now handles OpenType fonts.

Re: OOo 3.2 for F12?

2010-04-29 Thread Mohamed El Morabity
2010/4/29 Kirk Lowery > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 08:24 -0400, Kirk Lowery wrote: > >> After googling around, it seems that OpenOffice 3.2 won't be > >> officially packaged for Fedora 12. I really would like to upgrade to > >> it beca

Re: OOo 3.2 for F12?

2010-04-29 Thread Kirk Lowery
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 08:24 -0400, Kirk Lowery wrote: >> After googling around, it seems that OpenOffice 3.2 won't be >> officially packaged for Fedora 12. I really would like to upgrade to >> it because 3.2 now handles OpenType fonts.

Re: OOo 3.2 for F12?

2010-04-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 08:24 -0400, Kirk Lowery wrote: > After googling around, it seems that OpenOffice 3.2 won't be > officially packaged for Fedora 12. I really would like to upgrade to > it because 3.2 now handles OpenType fonts. > > Can anyone confirm that 3.2 definitely won't be packaged for

OOo 3.2 for F12?

2010-04-29 Thread Kirk Lowery
After googling around, it seems that OpenOffice 3.2 won't be officially packaged for Fedora 12. I really would like to upgrade to it because 3.2 now handles OpenType fonts. Can anyone confirm that 3.2 definitely won't be packaged for F12? In that case, what would be the best alternative? Are there