On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 09:48 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 01Feb2018 12:04, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > See how that logic feels to you.
> >
> > Just an update on this. I tried a lightly-modified version of your
> > script and got it to work. However as it stands it will only work
> > co
On 01Feb2018 12:04, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
See how that logic feels to you.
Just an update on this. I tried a lightly-modified version of your
script and got it to work. However as it stands it will only work
correctly if I deal with all the files in a set in one run, and don't
change my m
On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 07:45 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Another untested version with a fix for his bug and a fix for the sleep thing:
>
>cd your-staging-directory
>n=1
>while :
>do
> moved=
> for f in *.jpg
> do
>[ -s "$f" ] || continue
>while :
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 14:07 -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
> > The idea is that the script picks up the files as fast as you drag them.
> > You might need to shrink the "sleep 1" to "sleep 0.1", or perhaps
> > better, to not sleep at all _if_ any files were run on that loop. The
> > sleep is there to s
On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 07:45 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > Dragging the files 'in the right order' doesn't affect their names. The
> > script loops over the files in lexical order, not in the order I've
> > dragged them, so the final order won't change.
>
> The idea is that the script picks up
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>
>
> Now (had to "rpm --erase . ." first and then install the new version -
> which installed a lot more stuff):
Sorry, you could have used:
dnf reinstall https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/Photini-2017.
12.0-1.fc27.noarch.rpm
Thanks,
Richard,
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:54:22 -0600
From: Richard Shaw
Subject: Re: Organising photos visually
To: p...@pricom.com.au, Community support for Fedora users
Message-ID:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="001a113c3c4cf77d4d05640
On 01/30/2018 12:45 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 30Jan2018 12:01, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 20:53 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>>> cd your-staging-directory
>>> n=1
>>> while :
>>> do
>>> for f in *.jpg
>>> do
>>> [ -s "$f" ] || continue
>>>
On 30Jan2018 12:01, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 20:53 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
cd your-staging-directory
n=1
while :
do
for f in *.jpg
do
[ -s "$f" ] || continue
while :
do
target=$( printf 'your-ordered-directory/%05d-%s' "$n"
[ Brought back on list, since Jon is very correct. - Cameron ]
On 30Jan2018 05:09, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 08:53:32PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Run a small shell script like this (untested, but happy to help debug):
cd your-staging-directory
n=1
while :
do
for f
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 08:56 -0600, Kenny Gow wrote:
> $ ls -lrt --time=ctime
>
> to order the list by the time each image was put into the directory.
> 'ctime' is the key. I use this all the time to see the latest
> new files in a directory, in time order.
BTW, for that I tend to use:
$ ls -last
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Richard,
>
> On Fedora 27 x86_64:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/bin/photini", line 6, in
> from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
> File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line
> 30
Richard,
On 2018-01-31 03:23, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:44:50 -0600
From: Richard Shaw
Subject: Re: Organising photos visually
To: Community support for Fedora users
Message-ID:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 08:44 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> From what I could tell searching google, you best bet is to plug in the info
> you need into the EXIF data and then rename the files based on the EXIF data.
>
> I've never used this before but it only took me about 10 minutes to package:
>
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 08:56 -0600, Kenny Gow wrote:
> On 01/30/2018 06:01 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > $ ls -l
> > total 7388
> > -rwxr--r--. 1 poc poc 1036281 Jan 29 11:38 20180129113839_01.jpg
> > -rwxr--r--. 1 poc poc 1183695 Jan 29 11:38 20180129113839_02.jpg
> > -rwxr--r--. 1 poc poc 113
On 01/30/2018 06:01 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> $ ls -l
> total 7388
> -rwxr--r--. 1 poc poc 1036281 Jan 29 11:38 20180129113839_01.jpg
> -rwxr--r--. 1 poc poc 1183695 Jan 29 11:38 20180129113839_02.jpg
> -rwxr--r--. 1 poc poc 1133299 Jan 29 11:38 20180129113839_03.jpg
> -rwxr--r--. 1 poc poc
>From what I could tell searching google, you best bet is to plug in the
info you need into the EXIF data and then rename the files based on the
EXIF data.
I've never used this before but it only took me about 10 minutes to package:
https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/Photini-2017.12.0-1.fc27.noa
Allegedly, on or about 30 January 2018, Patrick O'Callaghan sent:
> is in principal a very simple requirement: the files were scanned in
> a certain order, but I want to reorder them in the sequence the shots
> were actually taken. This has to be manual because the files have no
> EXIF information.
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 20:53 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> cd your-staging-directory
> n=1
> while :
> do
> for f in *.jpg
> do
> [ -s "$f" ] || continue
> while :
> do
> target=$( printf 'your-ordered-directory/%05d-%s' "$n" "$f" )
> [ -e "$target
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 20:53 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 29Jan2018 12:35, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 12:27 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > Looking for some advice here. I have a large set of old slides
> > > (transparencies) which I'm currently scanning for
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 08:20 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 30/1/18 12:22 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 07:49 -0500, William Oliver wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 12:27 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > Looking for some advice here. I have a large set of old
On 29Jan2018 12:35, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 12:27 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Looking for some advice here. I have a large set of old slides
(transparencies) which I'm currently scanning for the family, but of
course many of them are out of order. Clearly they don
On 30/1/18 12:22 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 07:49 -0500, William Oliver wrote:
On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 12:27 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Looking for some advice here. I have a large set of old slides
(transparencies) which I'm currently scanning for the family, but
On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 07:49 -0500, William Oliver wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 12:27 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Looking for some advice here. I have a large set of old slides
> > (transparencies) which I'm currently scanning for the family, but of
> > course many of them are out of ord
On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 12:27 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Looking for some advice here. I have a large set of old slides
> (transparencies) which I'm currently scanning for the family, but of
> course many of them are out of order. Clearly they don't have EXIF
> information (they were taken i
Allegedly, on or about 29 January 2018, Patrick O'Callaghan sent:
> Looking for some advice here. I have a large set of old slides
> (transparencies) which I'm currently scanning for the family, but of
> course many of them are out of order.
I suppose it depends on how you're going to view them.
On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 12:27 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Looking for some advice here. I have a large set of old slides
> (transparencies) which I'm currently scanning for the family, but of
> course many of them are out of order. Clearly they don't have EXIF
> information (they were taken i
Looking for some advice here. I have a large set of old slides
(transparencies) which I'm currently scanning for the family, but of
course many of them are out of order. Clearly they don't have EXIF
information (they were taken in the 70s and 80s). I'm looking for a way
to order them *visually* aft
28 matches
Mail list logo
