Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-07 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 06 June 2017, Samuel Sieb sent: > Maybe you could point out to them that all the major webmail (and > forum) providers don't expect you to use the web interface on your > phone. They provide alternate access, usually with a native app (or > standard protocol) of some sort.

RE: Modern webmail client

2017-06-07 Thread J.Witvliet
Some {free) WIFI-providers block much else besides 80 & 443. That’s the only sensible reason for using webnail. -Original Message- From: Tom Horsley [mailto:horsley1...@gmail.com] Sent: dinsdag 6 juni 2017 21:37 To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Modern webmail client On

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/06/2017 03:19 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 06/06/2017 03:04 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> I think of Squirrelmail as a remote MUA or an MUA proxy. The MUA >> functionality remains on the Squirrelmail server--not on the client as >> in a classic MUA. It simply uses the browser to do the GUI part o

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 06/06/2017 03:04 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: I think of Squirrelmail as a remote MUA or an MUA proxy. The MUA functionality remains on the Squirrelmail server--not on the client as in a classic MUA. It simply uses the browser to do the GUI part of the job. You have to explicitly request downloadin

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/06/2017 02:17 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 06/06/2017 02:01 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> Just to clarify for others reading this thread, Squirrelmail is a >> web-based mail _server_, not a client. It pulls mail off an MTA (mail >> transport agent like sendmail) by either behaving like an MDA (ma

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/06/2017 02:14 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> On 06/06/2017 11:42 AM, Alex wrote: >>> Hi, we have fedora25 set up with apache and dovecot and have been >>> using squirrelmail. We're looking to replace squirrelmail with >>> something more mode

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 06/06/2017 02:01 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: Just to clarify for others reading this thread, Squirrelmail is a web-based mail _server_, not a client. It pulls mail off an MTA (mail transport agent like sendmail) by either behaving like an MDA (mail delivery agent) or by using a real MDA such as do

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Alex
Hi, On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 06/06/2017 11:42 AM, Alex wrote: >> Hi, we have fedora25 set up with apache and dovecot and have been >> using squirrelmail. We're looking to replace squirrelmail with >> something more modern and "responsive" on mobile. > > Just to cla

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/06/2017 11:42 AM, Alex wrote: > Hi, we have fedora25 set up with apache and dovecot and have been > using squirrelmail. We're looking to replace squirrelmail with > something more modern and "responsive" on mobile. Just to clarify for others reading this thread, Squirrelmail is a web-based m

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/06/2017 01:01 PM, Andy Blanchard wrote: "No, it's just you... The IMAP client is perfectly fine, here, look!" *evil grin* Have you been taking lessons from Simon the BOFH? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 06/06/2017 12:27 PM, Alex wrote: Yes, I agree, and that's what I've asked them to do, but they still prefer the webmail client. Maybe you could point out to them that all the major webmail (and forum) providers don't expect you to use the web interface on your phone. They provide alternat

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Andy Blanchard
On 6 June 2017 at 20:53, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> Then that means they prefer squirrelmail, right? So you might >> as well keep using it or they'll hate the replacement just >> as irrationally :-). > > > I would second this. Someone that prefers webmail *on a phone* over a > native app is likely to

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 06/06/2017 12:36 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:27:51 -0400 Alex wrote: Why wouldn't you just use an IMAP client on the phone? Yes, I agree, and that's what I've asked them to do, but they still prefer the webmail client. Then that means they prefer squirrelmail, right? So

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Tom Horsley
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:27:51 -0400 Alex wrote: > > Why wouldn't you just use an IMAP client on the phone? > > Yes, I agree, and that's what I've asked them to do, but they still > prefer the webmail client. Then that means they prefer squirrelmail, right? So you might as well keep using it or t

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 06/06/2017 11:42 AM, Alex wrote: Before I start installing and testing roundcube, rainloop, and the others, I thought I would ask this list if they have a preference for users on mobile? I've gotten to be pretty impressed with SOGo. They maintain a yum repo for customers. If you want to b

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Alex
Hi, >> Hi, we have fedora25 set up with apache and dovecot and have been >> using squirrelmail. We're looking to replace squirrelmail with >> something more modern and "responsive" on mobile. >> >> Before I start installing and testing roundcube, rainloop, and the >> others, I thought I would ask

Re: Modern webmail client

2017-06-06 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 06/06/2017 11:42 AM, Alex wrote: Hi, we have fedora25 set up with apache and dovecot and have been using squirrelmail. We're looking to replace squirrelmail with something more modern and "responsive" on mobile. Before I start installing and testing roundcube, rainloop, and the others, I thou