Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>>> john wendel wrote:
>>>
Looks like I'll spend a little time poking at F13 scp and see if I can
improve the transfer speed.
>>> Maybe you are using compression? Compression is a disadvantage when
>>> the network is f
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> john wendel wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like I'll spend a little time poking at F13 scp and see if I can
>>> improve the transfer speed.
>> Maybe you are using compression? Compression is a disadvantage when
>> the network is fast (gigabit); you just spend C
>There actually is a patch to provide encryption "none" to improve speed and
>reduce CPU for trusted connections.
That would be cool, but you can avoid this by rsyncing over an alternative
transport, like rsh to a remote rsync daemon which you can instantiate off
the cmd line trivially...
jlc
-
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> john wendel wrote:
>
>> Looks like I'll spend a little time poking at F13 scp and see if I can
>> improve the transfer speed.
>
> Maybe you are using compression? Compression is a disadvantage when
> the network is fast (gigabit); you just spend CPU time.
>
> Then there
john wendel wrote:
> Looks like I'll spend a little time poking at F13 scp and see if I can
> improve the transfer speed.
Maybe you are using compression? Compression is a disadvantage when
the network is fast (gigabit); you just spend CPU time.
Then there is encryption. That can't be turned of
On 08/21/2010 12:52 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> john wendel wrote:
>> I've got a couple of boxes connected with wire and a gigabit ethernet
>> switch. With F11 on the sending and receiving sides, I see a transfer
>> speed of ~ 40 MB/s transfering large files. With F13 on the sending box
>> (same bo
