I downgraded to clamd 0.99.4-3 and it works.
so something broke in 0.100.0-2
Suggestions on how to track down the failure cause to see if it is a
configuration error on my part or a broken package/dependency?
Jeff
On 2018-06-12 13:46, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
> this morning I did a dnf upgrade
Hi
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
/usr/bin/rkhunter: Osx.Worm.Inqtana-3 FOUND
/usr/bin/rkhunter: moved to '/var/cache/clam/rkhunter.001'
rkhunter-1.4.2-2.fc20.noarch
Rkhunter was updated to this during the week,http://ask.fedoraproject.org
rkhunter is likely getting
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 09:53 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
/usr/bin/rkhunter: Osx.Worm.Inqtana-3 FOUND
/usr/bin/rkhunter: moved to '/var/cache/clam/rkhunter.001'
The ClamAV Inqtana-3 check looks for a couple of phrases (actually parts
of filenames) which also occur in rkhunter as part of its
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:46:56 +0100
John Horne john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 09:53 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
/usr/bin/rkhunter: Osx.Worm.Inqtana-3 FOUND
/usr/bin/rkhunter: moved to '/var/cache/clam/rkhunter.001'
The ClamAV Inqtana-3 check looks for a couple of
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote:
Bugfix (by a non-Albanian): FIRST send this mail to everyone you know, and
AFTER THAT delete all the files on the disk.
See. Open source works!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
Tim:
If you read the reviews of anti-virus software, from time to time, you
will see that none of them are 100% effective. The last review I read
came to the conclusion that the most effective checkers only managed to
find about 60% of the viruses, and not all the same viruses. That is a
From: Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, 2010/April/20 06:00
Tim:
If you read the reviews of anti-virus software, from time to time, you
will see that none of them are 100% effective. The last review I read
came to the conclusion that the most effective checkers only managed to
DEAR RECEIVER,
You have just received an Albanian virus. Since we are not so
technologically advanced in Albania, this is a MANUAL virus. Please
delete all the files on your hard disk yourself and send this mail to
everyone you know.
Thank you very much for collaboration.
Dr. Alban, the
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 00:07:57 kalinix wrote:
DEAR RECEIVER,
You have just received an Albanian virus. Since we are not so
technologically advanced in Albania, this is a MANUAL virus. Please
delete all the files on your hard disk yourself and send this mail to
everyone you know.
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:46:56 -0400
Steven W. Orr ste...@syslang.net wrote:
I have this feeling that most people are missing the point of why CLAMAV is a
useful tool. If you do it to protect yourself against a virus then that's the
wrong reason. We can debate this till we're blue in the face,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:16:02 +0100,
Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
The number of Linux people who don't realise that this is just as true
viewing a PDF or PS file in the wrong way is astounding. PDF and PS have
a safe mode but an alarming number of people set their helper apps
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 11:20 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Anti virus is still the wrong way to go for this stuff. It doesn't
scale well. It sucks a lot of resources. It doesn't match all bad
stuff.
Yes, it's always been a bit of a fail... It lags behind in detecting
new things, they only
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 12:28 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
If the virus definitions from Clamav is written for linux based
viruses and not windows based then what real good is it.
All virus definitions should be included with the scan
Especially if Wine and virtualbox are running on a linux
From: Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au
Sent: Monday, 2010/April/19 10:29
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 12:28 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
If the virus definitions from Clamav is written for linux based
viruses and not windows based then what real good is it.
All virus definitions should be included
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 19:54:10 -0700,
jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
When giving advice it's best to presume the user is going to do something
unusual, such as run Wine, and receive an infection. A Wine install needs
ClamAV. Without Wine I'd suggest chkrootkit and rkhunter, at the least.
On 04/17/2010 07:54 PM, jdow wrote:
From: Sam Sharpelists.red...@samsharpe.net
Sent: Saturday, 2010/April/17 13:20
On 17 April 2010 21:05, jdowj...@earthlink.net wrote:
From: Sam Sharpelists.red...@samsharpe.net
Sent: Saturday, 2010/April/17 02:25
On 17 April 2010
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 10:13 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
[...]
I think that it is a must to have protection on your machines
considering I am looking at a machine that was supposed to be bullet
proof, and proved to be infectable with windows crap through wine. If
you are running wine
On 04/18/2010 10:22 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 10:13 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
[...]
I think that it is a must to have protection on your machines
considering I am looking at a machine that was supposed to be bullet
proof, and proved to be
So the myth is just that, a myth
IOW, when you run Windows apps, you get infected.
Where's the myth? Did
your Linux system crash? Were any of your system files
corrupted? Was
any of your non-Wine data leaked? Was your root
password compromised?
Did anything happen that would
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 10:39 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
On 04/18/2010 10:22 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 10:13 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
[...]
I think that it is a must to have protection on your machines
considering I am looking at a
On 04/18/2010 10:54 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
So the myth is just that, a myth
IOW, when you run Windows apps, you get infected.
Where's the myth? Did
your Linux system crash? Were any of your system files
corrupted? Was
any of your non-Wine data
On 04/15/2010 12:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 12:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
I have removed all and I will wait for proper instruction as I really
do not know enough about this OS
Given that you say so yourself, the logical question is why do you need
--- On Sun, 4/18/10, Daniel B. Thurman d...@cdkkt.com wrote:
From: Daniel B. Thurman d...@cdkkt.com
Subject: Re: Clamav
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Sunday, April 18, 2010, 11:37 AM
On 04/15/2010 12:50 PM, Patrick
O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu
On Sunday 18 April 2010, Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Sun, 4/18/10, Daniel B. Thurman d...@cdkkt.com wrote:
From: Daniel B. Thurman d...@cdkkt.com
Subject: Re: Clamav
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Sunday, April 18, 2010, 11:37 AM
On 04/15/2010 12
On 04/18/2010 11:48 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Sun, 4/18/10, Daniel B. Thurmand...@cdkkt.com wrote:
From: Daniel B. Thurmand...@cdkkt.com
Subject: Re: Clamav
To: Community support for Fedora usersusers@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Sunday, April 18, 2010, 11:37 AM
On 04/15
On 04/18/2010 12:00 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 April 2010, Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Sun, 4/18/10, Daniel B. Thurmand...@cdkkt.com wrote:
From: Daniel B. Thurmand...@cdkkt.com
Subject: Re: Clamav
To: Community support for Fedora usersusers@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 12:37 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
One other weird thing i forgot to mention.
I install xp via wine 2 months ago.
Have not touched it since.
Started scanning just to see a week ago.
The files that were renamed by the virus were done two days ago,
according to time
On 04/18/2010 12:53 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 12:37 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
One other weird thing i forgot to mention.
I install xp via wine 2 months ago.
Have not touched it since.
Started scanning just to see a week ago.
The files that were renamed by the
On Sunday 18 April 2010, Michael Miles wrote:
On 04/18/2010 12:00 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 April 2010, Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Sun, 4/18/10, Daniel B. Thurmand...@cdkkt.com wrote:
From: Daniel B. Thurmand...@cdkkt.com
Subject: Re: Clamav
To: Community support for Fedora
On Sunday 18 April 2010, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 12:37 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
One other weird thing i forgot to mention.
I install xp via wine 2 months ago.
Have not touched it since.
Started scanning just to see a week ago.
The files that were renamed by the virus
From: Michael Miles mmami...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, 2010/April/18 10:13
On 04/17/2010 07:54 PM, jdow wrote:
From: Sam Sharpelists.red...@samsharpe.net
Sent: Saturday, 2010/April/17 13:20
On 17 April 2010 21:05, jdowj...@earthlink.net wrote:
From: Sam Sharpelists.red...@samsharpe.net
From: Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
Sent: Sunday, 2010/April/18 12:00
On Sunday 18 April 2010, Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Sun, 4/18/10, Daniel B. Thurman d...@cdkkt.com wrote:
From: Daniel B. Thurman d...@cdkkt.com
Subject: Re: Clamav
To: Community support for Fedora users users
From: Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
Sent: Sunday, 2010/April/18 13:39
On Sunday 18 April 2010, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 12:37 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
One other weird thing i forgot to mention.
I install xp via wine 2 months ago.
Have not touched it since.
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 10:39 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
My point is if wine is part of a Fedora install because it installs
with Fedora automatically it is part of the system in general.
Wine is not installed automatically. In no sense is it part of the
system. Anyone who installs Wine should
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 11:37 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
Given that you say so yourself, the logical question is why do you
need
Clamav? Clamav is usually installed by people running mail servers
for
users who access them from Windows.
Where is the proof that an AV is not needed for
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 12:28 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
If the virus definitions from Clamav is written for linux based
viruses and not windows based then what real good is it.
You seem to be rather confused about ClamAV. AFAIK it's designed to trap
Windows viruses in email, since these are the
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 13:58 -0700, jdow wrote:
I think that it is a must to have protection on your machines
considering I am looking at a machine that was supposed to be bullet
proof, and proved to be infectable with windows crap through wine. If
you are running wine without protection
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 16:57 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 12:28 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
If the virus definitions from Clamav is written for linux based
viruses and not windows based then what real good is it.
You seem to be rather confused about ClamAV. AFAIK
On 04/18/2010 02:28 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 13:58 -0700, jdow wrote:
I think that it is a must to have protection on your machines
considering I am looking at a machine that was supposed to be bullet
proof, and proved to be infectable with windows crap through wine.
I have this feeling that most people are missing the point of why CLAMAV is a
useful tool. If you do it to protect yourself against a virus then that's the
wrong reason. We can debate this till we're blue in the face, but AFAICT there
is no threat of a virus against anything other than Windows.
I
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 14:12 -0700, jdow wrote:
the question becomes, how did they get there?
Michael says he hardly used it. It also is an infection that has appeared
on a Linux system. GNU/Linux is not bulletproof.
{^_^}
99% of the cases the interference between the chair and the
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, 2010/April/18 14:27
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 12:28 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
If the virus definitions from Clamav is written for linux based
viruses and not windows based then what real good is it.
You seem to be rather confused
From: Michael Miles mmami...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, 2010/April/18 14:39
...
Has been nuked
Got rid of wine all together
Virtualbox as well.
If I am going to run windows products I will do it in it's own PC and
that's that.
Too bad I really liked virtualbox
Re ran scans with Avira
From: Steven W. Orr ste...@syslang.net
Sent: Sunday, 2010/April/18 14:46
...
Another thing ClamAV does on an email scan is pick off a goodly number
of phishes, some of which are really well done. It helps mitigate a
wetware failure mechanism.
{o.o}
--
users mailing list
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 15:32 -0700, jdow wrote:
Needed or not, I personally believe it is wise to use them. And if
you feel ClamAV is inappropriate do mention tools that are appropriate
such as chkrootkit and rkhunter.
This is the last time I'm going to say it: I wasn't then and am not now
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 14:39 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
Virtualbox as well.
If I am going to run windows products I will do it in it's own PC and
that's that.
Too bad I really liked virtualbox
VB (and VMware, and KVM) are entirely different from Wine. Perhaps you
need to understand the
On 04/18/2010 03:36 PM, jdow wrote:
From: Michael Milesmmami...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, 2010/April/18 14:39
...
Has been nuked
Got rid of wine all together
Virtualbox as well.
If I am going to run windows products I will do it in it's own PC and
that's that.
Too bad I really
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, 2010/April/18 16:18
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 15:32 -0700, jdow wrote:
Needed or not, I personally believe it is wise to use them. And if
you feel ClamAV is inappropriate do mention tools that are appropriate
such as chkrootkit and
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 22:49
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 19:43 -0700, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 16:51
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 13:47 -0700, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghan
On 17 April 2010 08:41, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 22:49
Which of the vulnerabilities discussed on the kernel list is
communicable via an email message in such a way as to compromise the
security of the target
From: Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.net
Sent: Saturday, 2010/April/17 02:09
On 17 April 2010 08:41, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 22:49
Which of the vulnerabilities discussed on the kernel list is
communicable
On 17 April 2010 10:17, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
jdow
How many people get frustrated with SELinux and simply disable it?
I don't know, but stupidity appears to be an infinite resource. I tend
to believe that if you disable SELinux and you get exploited by
something that SELinux would
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 20:29:25 -0700,
Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
Clearly no OS is safe from exploit. The most effective security method
employed on Linux is simply not to run as superuser where most Windows
and Macintosh users are running as superuser and the software
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 00:41 -0700, jdow wrote:
Which of the vulnerabilities discussed on the kernel list is
communicable via an email message in such a way as to compromise the
security of the target system without manual intervention on the
part of
its user? Please be specific.
Here
On Saturday 17 April 2010, jdow wrote:
From: Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.net
Sent: Saturday, 2010/April/17 02:09
On 17 April 2010 08:41, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 22:49
Which of the vulnerabilities
On 04/17/2010 04:17 AM, jdow wrote:
jdow
How many people get frustrated with SELinux and simply disable it?
{o.o}
It is hard to say. How many people get frustrated with iptables and
simply disable the firewall? It is the same type of fix.
I have seen some people on this list recommend
On 04/17/2010 12:41 AM, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghanpocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 22:49
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 19:43 -0700, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghanpocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 16:51
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at
From: Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.net
Sent: Saturday, 2010/April/17 02:25
On 17 April 2010 10:17, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
jdow
How many people get frustrated with SELinux and simply disable it?
I don't know, but stupidity appears to be an infinite resource. I tend
to believe
From: Michael Miles mmami...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, 2010/April/17 09:02
On 04/17/2010 12:41 AM, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghanpocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 22:49
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 19:43 -0700, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghanpocallag...@gmail.com
On 17 April 2010 21:05, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
From: Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.net
Sent: Saturday, 2010/April/17 02:25
On 17 April 2010 10:17, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
jdow
How many people get frustrated with SELinux and simply disable it?
I don't know, but stupidity
From: Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.net
Sent: Saturday, 2010/April/17 13:20
On 17 April 2010 21:05, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
From: Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.net
Sent: Saturday, 2010/April/17 02:25
On 17 April 2010 10:17, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
jdow
How many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/15/2010 05:32 PM, Michael Miles wrote:
On 04/15/2010 01:09 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 04/15/2010 03:22 PM, Michael Miles wrote:
How on earth do I set this up to get virus definitions that selinux
won't jump all over
I just want
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 2010/April/15 12:50
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 12:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
I have removed all and I will wait for proper instruction as I really
do not know enough about this OS
Given that you say so yourself, the logical
From: Michael Miles mmami...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 2010/April/15 13:02
On 04/15/2010 12:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 12:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
I have removed all and I will wait for proper instruction as I really
do not know enough about this OS
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 2010/April/15 13:31
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 13:02 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
Is Fedora really that secure?
Even if we limit the discussion to email viruses, that's a very complex
and difficult question (to which the answer is
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 13:39:42 -0700,
jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 2010/April/15 12:50
4) I will agree with you as far as to say Linux is not as vulnerable as
Windows. That is mostly because it is still perceived as being
On 04/16/2010 01:39 PM, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghanpocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 2010/April/15 12:50
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 12:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
I have removed all and I will wait for proper instruction as I really
do not know enough about this OS
Michael Miles wrote:
On 04/16/2010 01:39 PM, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghanpocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 2010/April/15 12:50
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 12:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
I have removed all and I will wait for proper instruction as I really
On 04/16/2010 03:00 PM, Seann Clark wrote:
Michael Miles wrote:
On 04/16/2010 01:39 PM, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghanpocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 2010/April/15 12:50
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 12:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
I have removed all and I will wait for proper
From: Michael Miles mmami...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 14:55
On 04/16/2010 01:39 PM, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghanpocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 2010/April/15 12:50
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 12:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
I have removed all and I will wait for
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 13:47 -0700, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 2010/April/15 13:31
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 13:02 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
Is Fedora really that secure?
Even if we limit the discussion to email viruses, that's a very
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 16:50
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 13:39 -0700, jdow wrote:
1) I have seen at least one active exploit, I fortunately recognized
myself, for Linux in my mumble years with computers. (longer than
yours, sonny, although I
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 16:51
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 13:47 -0700, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 2010/April/15 13:31
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 13:02 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
Is Fedora really
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 19:37 -0700, jdow wrote:
You also said Linux machines were perfectly safe. And I reacted by
saying I don't believe that. Active exploits exist for Linux. Some are
transmitted by email and activated in one of the more or less standard
ways.
People said MacOS was
On 04/16/2010 04:26 PM, jdow wrote:
From: Seann Clarknombran...@tsukinokage.net
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 15:00
As a note, Virus Total is a good proving ground on how most AV programs
just plain suck half the time especially with bleeding edge bugs.
(Search Sans ISC for articles on that
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 19:37 -0700, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 16:50
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 13:39 -0700, jdow wrote:
1) I have seen at least one active exploit, I fortunately recognized
myself, for Linux in my mumble years with
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 19:43 -0700, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 2010/April/16 16:51
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 13:47 -0700, jdow wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 2010/April/15 13:31
On Thu, 2010-04-15
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 12:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
I have removed all and I will wait for proper instruction as I really
do not know enough about this OS
Given that you say so yourself, the logical question is why do you need
Clamav? Clamav is usually installed by people running mail
On 04/15/2010 12:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 12:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
I have removed all and I will wait for proper instruction as I really
do not know enough about this OS
Given that you say so yourself, the logical question is why do you need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/15/2010 03:22 PM, Michael Miles wrote:
How on earth do I set this up to get virus definitions that selinux
won't jump all over
I just want email scanned out and in
I tried the latest 96 could only find i686 rpm for clamav, clamd,
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 13:02 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
Is Fedora really that secure?
Even if we limit the discussion to email viruses, that's a very complex
and difficult question (to which the answer is yes :-). It's not an
attribute exclusive to Fedora as such, but to all Unix-based systems,
81 matches
Mail list logo
