On 06/09/2015 12:43 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply, this is the information I was missing!
DisplayLink is crucial search keyword, so after DuckDuckGo-ingit
(yeah, I know) found a ArchWiki page that says there is some
experimental open source support:
https://wiki.archl
On 06/09/15 15:38, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> Here is bugzilla link:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224534
>
> But now that I searched I see few similar open bugs. I see @birger
> saying that it is a driver issue, thought so. I hope some red hat
> people up the chain ladder
Sorry I missed this crucial line:
"Note: Modern USB 3.0 DisplayLink adapters are not supported as of
October 2014.[1] Older DisplayLink chips (USB 2.0) are supported."
On 9 June 2015 at 09:43, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, this is the information I was missing!
> Disp
Thanks for your reply, this is the information I was missing!
DisplayLink is crucial search keyword, so after DuckDuckGo-ingit
(yeah, I know) found a ArchWiki page that says there is some
experimental open source support:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DisplayLink
So is there a way to get Di
Here is bugzilla link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224534
But now that I searched I see few similar open bugs. I see @birger
saying that it is a driver issue, thought so. I hope some red hat
people up the chain ladder also have this issue with their laptops and
contact Lenovo and
The lenovo USB 3 dock uses DisplayLink chips for the display part. DisplayLink
have not provided a linux driver for the new chip set yet even if they promised
so when they launched it. :-(
The Lenovo OneLink dock has USB 3, power and DisplayPort in one cable. If you
have a lenovo pc with the O
On 06/09/15 07:38, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> I love Fedora, but there is still no fix for Lenovo docks :( No
> external monitor works over dock, but under windows they work
> flawlessly :(
> But reported weeks and weeks ago... still no reply :(
What is the bugzilla?
--
Sorta what I want
I love Fedora, but there is still no fix for Lenovo docks :( No
external monitor works over dock, but under windows they work
flawlessly :(
But reported weeks and weeks ago... still no reply :(
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 22:36:07 +0200,
Suvayu Ali wrote:
Well, my first preupgrade experience was okayish, but I was also very
new to linux then. However by the time preupgrade had resolved its
issues, I had already moved on to yum. I just find it a bit surprising
that it is not *one of* th
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 11:16 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 16:51 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > I removed kmod-nvidia after failing to get a GUI on first boot.
> > Then
> > it
> > worked (with Nouveau of course). I didn't rebuild
> > initrd.
>
> Nvidia worked good
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 16:51 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I removed kmod-nvidia after failing to get a GUI on first boot. Then
> it
> worked (with Nouveau of course). I didn't rebuild
> initrd.
Nvidia worked good with one kernel initially (4.0.2 I think cause had a
kmod built already), but
On 05/27/2015 05:29 PM, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
There are a bunch of Perl modules that need to be rebuilt.
Which? I am not aware of any Fedora-provided Perl module which this
would apply to.
Ralf
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opti
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 08:29 -0700, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
> *** If you have the nVIDIA kmod stuff installed from rpmforge,
> uninstall
> before you upgrade. It is a lot less painful than rebuilding initrd
> on the
> command line. (Which I have done before, but not for the squeamish.)
> Actual
>>
>>
>> On 05/26/2015 05:26 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 17:50 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> YMMV. In my case it was all over in 30 minutes, but I have a
reasonably
> fast
> machine and Internet connection. I wouldn't expect the total
elapsed
>
On 05/27/2015 12:20 AM, Derek Tattersall wrote:
>
> Speaking of clobbered.
>
> I ran the fedup upgrade today, and something seems to have gone badly
> wrong. It still has the old f21 kernel
> Konsole output
> uname -r => 3.19.7-200.fc21.x86_64
what command did you run?? fedup --network 22 ??
did y
On 05/26/2015 10:44 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
From the log of the not working machine, there are a bunch of lines
missing.
It seems like whatever does this part was not executed:
[ 0.080] (II) fedup:() /usr/bin/fedup 0.9.2 starting at Tue
May 26 20:17:05 2015
[ 0.117] (II) fedup.sysp
On 05/27/2015 01:04 AM, Derek Tattersall wrote:
>
>
> On 05/26/2015 09:52 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 05/26/2015 09:20 PM, Derek Tattersall wrote:
>>> Is there a way to rescue my system? Or should I scrub it and start over?
>>
>> Probably. Check /var/log/fedup.log to see what went wrong, fir
On 05/26/2015 10:04 PM, Derek Tattersall wrote:
Not working machine:
...
[ 1581.578] (II) fedup:message() 2:libnm-qt-0.9.8.4-1.fc21.x86_64
[ 1581.580] (II) fedup:() /bin/fedup exiting cleanly at Tue May
26 08:31:42 2015
I can't be sure without seeing the rest of the log, but that isn't t
On 05/26/2015 09:52 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/26/2015 09:20 PM, Derek Tattersall wrote:
Is there a way to rescue my system? Or should I scrub it and start over?
Probably. Check /var/log/fedup.log to see what went wrong, first.
How you proceed probably depends on what failed.
Actual
On 05/26/2015 09:20 PM, Derek Tattersall wrote:
Is there a way to rescue my system? Or should I scrub it and start over?
Probably. Check /var/log/fedup.log to see what went wrong, first. How
you proceed probably depends on what failed.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 05/26/2015 08:14 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 05/26/2015 08:55 PM, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
On 05/26/2015 05:26 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 17:50 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
YMMV. In my case it was all over in 30 minutes, but I have a
reasonably
fast
machine and Int
On 05/26/2015 08:55 PM, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
On 05/26/2015 05:26 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 17:50 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
YMMV. In my case it was all over in 30 minutes, but I have a
reasonably
fast
machine and Internet connection. I wouldn't expect the t
>
>
> On 05/26/2015 05:26 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 17:50 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
YMMV. In my case it was all over in 30 minutes, but I have a
>>> reasonably
fast
machine and Internet connection. I wouldn't expect the total
>>> elapsed
time to va
On 05/26/2015 05:26 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 17:50 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
YMMV. In my case it was all over in 30 minutes, but I have a
reasonably
fast
machine and Internet connection. I wouldn't expect the total
elapsed
time to vary much with alternative upg
> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 16:00 -0700, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
>> > I had about 2800 packages to update, cleanup, and verify.
>>
>> There is a big difference doing an upgrade on a system with an SSD vs
>> a
>> SATA hard drive. Having a fast pipe also helps a lot.
>
> Forgot to mention that I have
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 16:00 -0700, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
> > I had about 2800 packages to update, cleanup, and verify.
>
> There is a big difference doing an upgrade on a system with an SSD vs
> a
> SATA hard drive. Having a fast pipe also helps a lot.
Forgot to mention that I have / on an
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 17:50 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> > YMMV. In my case it was all over in 30 minutes, but I have a
> reasonably
> > fast
> > machine and Internet connection. I wouldn't expect the total
> elapsed
> > time to vary much with alternative upgrade methods.
> >
> > poc
> >
>
>
> On 05/26/2015 05:45 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 16:06 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
>>> On 05/26/2015 03:36 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:05:38PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 12:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> IIRC yum used t
On 05/26/2015 05:45 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 16:06 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
>> On 05/26/2015 03:36 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:05:38PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/26/2015 12:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> IIRC yum used to be re
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 16:06 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 03:36 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:05:38PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > > On 05/26/2015 12:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > IIRC yum used to be recommended before fedup came along. In any
> > > >
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:06:48PM -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> If I were to add anything to the fedup documentation it would be
> Start this and then go to lunch. It's gonna be a while.
Or to sleep, yes. :)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproje
On 05/26/2015 03:36 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:05:38PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 05/26/2015 12:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> IIRC yum used to be recommended before fedup came along. In any case
>>> I've just upgraded with fedup and it worked again as it has for th
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:05:38PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 12:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >IIRC yum used to be recommended before fedup came along. In any case
> >I've just upgraded with fedup and it worked again as it has for the
> >last 4 or 5 upgrades.
>
> Before there wa
On 05/26/2015 12:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
IIRC yum used to be recommended before fedup came along. In any case
I've just upgraded with fedup and it worked again as it has for the
last 4 or 5 upgrades.
Before there was the aptly-named fedup, there was preupgrade, which
worked just fine
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 21:22 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> This question is not exactly about FedUp. I find it strange that no
> release so far has supported yum (or dnf now) as one of the upgrade
> methods. And yet, I have had the most reliable upgrade experiences
> with
> it since F12 or so! Any
Hi Matthew,
Looking forward to this release. I haven't read the release notes yet,
however I have a few questions or comments. If "read the release notes"
is the best answer, please feel free to say so :).
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 09:49:49AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> * Atomic Improvement
36 matches
Mail list logo
