On 08/03/15 05:49, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I do not have any Wifi in Fedora 22 while when I boot on the DVD
>> live, I can get the Wifi.
>> How can I setup it right?
> It may not be enabled in hardware (logic board's firmware setup
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I do not have any Wifi in Fedora 22 while when I boot on the DVD
> live, I can get the Wifi.
> How can I setup it right?
It may not be enabled in hardware (logic board's firmware setup menu,
or often there's a function key + icon t
On 02/03/2015 07:31 AM, poma wrote:
On 02.02.2015 20:52, Stephen Morris wrote:
I issued this command which didn't display much, but the output is
below. The first line is very interesting.
Couldn't open device, some information will be missing
bcdUSB 2.10
bcdDevice
On 05/12/2015 04:52 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
<<>>
> I tried all the mechanisms suggested in the manual, and none worked.
> If I were writing the manual, I would say on page 1,
> "The first step has to be to access the device web-page.
> If you aren't able to do this you cannot set up the repeat
Doug:
>> You should be able to access the device over the network in wifi mode
>> simply by entering the ip address in the address line of your router.
>
Timothy Murphy:
> I get the web-page of my router when I do that.
Depending on how your wireless extender works, it could just act like a
switc
Doug wrote:
>> In any case, I managed to see the device's web-page briefly,
>> by switching off WiFi on my laptop, connecting the device
>> to the laptop by ethernet, and changing the laptop's ethernet address
>> to 192.168.10.5 .
>> Now I could see the web-page at 192.168.10.1 for about 30 second
Tim wrote:
>> The manual says the device has IP address 192.168.10.1,
>> but as far as I can see you have to have a machine
>> running 192.168.10.something to see the device's web-page?
>> I know 192.168.10.* is an allowed address,
>> but is it so popular that one can assume it is in use?
> Withi
On 05/11/2015 07:33 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
/snip/
But I haven't actually solved my problem.
/snip/
I've continued to try to get my SilverCrest WiFi extender working
(model SWR 300 a1, from Lidl).
(Actually, I've asked in a few places about this,
and never heard from anyone who has it wor
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 13:33 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> The manual says the device has IP address 192.168.10.1,
> but as far as I can see you have to have a machine
> running 192.168.1.something to see the device's web-page?
> I know 192.168.10.* is an allowed address,
> but is it so popular tha
g wrote:
>> Actually, I already did that - I got two much longer arms from
>> Amazon, which had a considerable effect.
>
> glad to have seen you cured problem.
> while re-indexing my firefox bookmarks, i ran across an interesting
> some interesting bookmarks tagged 'wifi antennas' that was still
On 04/24/2015 06:04 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Doug wrote:
>
>> Another "fix"--obtain a longer antenna made for the frequency
>> band, which is surely 2400~2480 MHz. Make sure the connector mates
>> with the connector on the router!
>> This may work, since you _almost_ have enough signal now, an
On 04/29/2015 11:01 AM, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
>>> This blessing is cursed... ;-)
>>>
>>> I wonder if all off-the-shelf WiFi antennas are omnidirectional.
>>> I've never actually needed to change my antenna.
>
> g:
>> not even.
>>
>> types include all sorts of; array beam, biconical, butterfly,
>>
Tim:
>> This blessing is cursed... ;-)
>>
>> I wonder if all off-the-shelf WiFi antennas are omnidirectional.
>> I've never actually needed to change my antenna.
g:
> not even.
>
> types include all sorts of; array beam, biconical, butterfly,
> cantenna, coaxial, corner reflector, dipole, disc
On 04/29/2015 06:09 AM, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
>>> With close distances, it's usually signal reflections, that mess up a
>>> signal, rather than signal losses. The reflections can add together
>>> in bad ways, and cancel out, or seriously mess up the signal.
>
> g:
>> all of which can be decreased w
My cell phone has no problem. chromecast has no problem. Shifting seats
doesn't make it go away. I'm 20 feet from the router in line of sight.
I'm not in a faraday cage. There are no overlapping channels.
There's no RF voodoo here.
sean
On 04/28/2015 02:52 AM, Tim wrote:
Timothy Murphy wrote
Tim:
>> With close distances, it's usually signal reflections, that mess up a
>> signal, rather than signal losses. The reflections can add together
>> in bad ways, and cancel out, or seriously mess up the signal.
g:
> all of which can be decreased with a parabolic reflector for each
> antenna.
On 04/29/2015 12:33 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 10:01 +0200, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
>> With only ten feet away, drop of signal because of distance isn't a
>> serious consideration.
>
> With close distances, it's usually signal reflections, that mess up a
> signal, rather than sign
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 10:01 +0200, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
> With only ten feet away, drop of signal because of distance isn't a
> serious consideration.
With close distances, it's usually signal reflections, that mess up a
signal, rather than signal losses. The reflections can add together i
erlap.
Hw
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Tim
Sent: dinsdag 28 april 2015 8:53
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: WiFi restoration
Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> One room in my hous
Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
>> and WiFi occasionally fails there.
>> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
>> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
>> Is there any other step I could take, short of r
On 04/23/2015 06:29 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
and WiFi occasionally fails there.
When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
Is there any other step I could take,
Hmm, one possible place to look at is the changelog on the later
kernel packages as they may include clues about wifi module updates
and related software stack.
B.R.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On 27 April 2015 at 11:02, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ian Malone wrote:
>
>> If restarting the card allows it to reconnect when it gets into the
>> connection lost state that does somewhat suggest there are accumulated
>> errors somewhere (in the driver maybe) due to the poor connection that
>> event
Ian Malone wrote:
> If restarting the card allows it to reconnect when it gets into the
> connection lost state that does somewhat suggest there are accumulated
> errors somewhere (in the driver maybe) due to the poor connection that
> eventually cause a failure. Increasing the signal by moving th
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/25/15 18:18, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I'm running Fedora/KDE, and I don't see anything called "Airplane mode"
>> (or Airplane anything) in KNetworkManager.
>
> I don't know what you mean by "KNetworkManager" but I am running F21/KDE.
>
> I am using "kde-plasma-nm". Whe
Allegedly, on or about 25 April 2015, Timothy Murphy sent:
> When I google for "fedora airplane mode" I get lots of hits
> but none of the ones I've looked at actually explain
> what they mean by this term.
Did you mean defining what Fedora does about it, or what "airplane mode"
refers to?
Airpl
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/25/15 18:18, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'm running Fedora/KDE, and I don't see anything called "Airplane mode"
(or Airplane anything) in KNetworkManager.
I don't know what you mean by "KNetworkManager" but I am running F21/KDE.
I am using "kde-plasma-
On 04/25/2015 05:08 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 10:22 +0200, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
Powerline adapters are illegal in several countries as they pollute
the radio spectrum.
I wasn't aware of that. They are not illegal where I live (UK).
I would not want to exclud
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 10:22 +0200, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
> Powerline adapters are illegal in several countries as they pollute
> the radio spectrum.
I wasn't aware of that. They are not illegal where I live (UK).
> Only good solution is cat6 or fibre and a second accesspoint.
Certainly the
On 04/25/15 18:18, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'm running Fedora/KDE, and I don't see anything called "Airplane mode"
> (or Airplane anything) in KNetworkManager.
I don't know what you mean by "KNetworkManager" but I am running F21/KDE.
I am using "kde-plasma-nm". When I left-click on the Network-I
On 25 April 2015 at 11:18, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Tim wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 01:22 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> Airplane mode? Is there such a thing on a laptop?
>>
>> I would have thought so, people do use laptops when they travel.
>
> I'm running Fedora/KDE, and I don't see anyth
Tim wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 01:22 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Airplane mode? Is there such a thing on a laptop?
>
> I would have thought so, people do use laptops when they travel.
I'm running Fedora/KDE, and I don't see anything called "Airplane mode"
(or Airplane anything) in KNetwo
Powerline adapters are illegal in several countries as they pollute the radio
spectrum.
Only good solution is cat6 or fibre and a second accesspoint.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
> Op 25 apr. 2015 om 01:36 heeft Patrick O'Callaghan
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 00:51 +02
On 04/25/2015 01:35 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 00:51 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I did get a longer antenna for the Linksys WRT54GL WiFi router.
I also tried to set up a WiFi repeater (SilverCrest SWR 300 a1)
but could not get it working under Fedora or Windows.
I ha
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 01:22 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Airplane mode? Is there such a thing on a laptop?
I would have thought so, people do use laptops when they travel.
I kind-of wouldn't expect it on a desktop, though, but the function may
be in all the wireless software.
--
tim@localho
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 00:35 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I tried a wireless repeater a few years ago. Complete waste of money,
> despite being a reputable brand (Linksys).
Interesting to know. Never actually used one, just know of their
existence. I can well imagine problems if there isn'
Matthew Miller wrote:
>> However, I didn't know computers (other than phones) had an Airplane
>> mode. Another thing that could be tried would be to rmmod the wifi driver
> They usually do -- look at
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/rfkill.txt
>
> and if you're curious, try the 'rfk
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 00:51 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > Move the wireless access point, move or improve the antenna
> (transmitter
> > and/or receiver), re-position the the failing client device, add
> another
> > access point or wireless repeater, move objects that may be in the
> way
> > of
Jim Lewis wrote:
>>> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
>>> and WiFi occasionally fails there.
>>> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
>>> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
>>> Is there any other step I could take, short of
Dan Mossor wrote:
>> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
>> and WiFi occasionally fails there.
>> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
>> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
>> Is there any other step I could take, short of re-b
Doug wrote:
> Another "fix"--obtain a longer antenna made for the frequency band,
> which is surely 2400~2480 MHz. Make sure the connector mates with the
> connector on the router!
> This may work, since you _almost_ have enough signal now, and another dB
> or two may make all the difference.
Act
Tim wrote:
>> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
>> and WiFi occasionally fails there.
>> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
>> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
>> Is there any other step I could take, short of re-booting?
On 04/24/2015 07:14 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 18:44 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
I do something similar that works great to boost the signal
across the length of the house, but I cut off a square of
aluminum flashing I had instead of opening up a beer can :-).
You hadn't finished drin
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 18:44 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I do something similar that works great to boost the signal
> across the length of the house, but I cut off a square of
> aluminum flashing I had instead of opening up a beer can :-).
You hadn't finished drinking it yet? ;-)
--
tim@localho
On 04/23/2015 03:44 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:36:16 -0400
Doug wrote:
WiFi is radio frequency signals. What you need to do is take steps to
make the signals stronger in that area.
http://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Wi-Fi-Booster-Using-Only-a-Can
(I do something similar that wo
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:36:16 -0400
Doug wrote:
> WiFi is radio frequency signals. What you need to do is take steps to
> make the signals stronger in that area.
http://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Wi-Fi-Booster-Using-Only-a-Can
(I do something similar that works great to boost the signal
across the l
On 04/23/2015 06:29 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
and WiFi occasionally fails there.
When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
Is there any other step I could tak
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:23:53AM -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
> However, I didn't know computers (other than phones) had an Airplane
> mode. Another thing that could be tried would be to rmmod the wifi driver
They usually do -- look at
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/rfkill.txt
and if you'
> On 04/23/2015 05:29 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
>> and WiFi occasionally fails there.
>> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
>> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
>> Is there any other st
On 04/23/2015 05:29 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
and WiFi occasionally fails there.
When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
Is there any other step I could take,
I have the same issue when the DHCP lease expires even though I
authenticate again to the network I do not get an IP back without a reboot
"systemctl resatart network.service" doesn't even work.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 2015-04-23 at 20:47:10 Tim wrote:
>
> > On
On 2015-04-23 at 20:47:10 Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 12:29 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
> > and WiFi occasionally fails there.
> > When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
> > Re-starting NetworkManager nev
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 12:29 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
> and WiFi occasionally fails there.
> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
> Is there any other
On 10.02.2015 02:08, poma wrote:
> On 09.02.2015 21:28, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>
>> On 02/04/2015 11:10 AM, poma wrote:
>>> Any throughput measurement, any at all? :)
>>>
>>>
>> I haven't been able to get any measurements as yet, I'm having trouble
>> synchronizing times with my son to use his Arc
On 02/10/2015 07:40 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/09/2015 12:28 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
One thing I have noticed is that since switching to this
modem/router/adapter combination my internet download speeds have
decreased significantly under both Linux and Windows, plus I can't play
games under Win
On 09.02.2015 21:28, Stephen Morris wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2015 11:10 AM, poma wrote:
>> Any throughput measurement, any at all? :)
>>
>>
> I haven't been able to get any measurements as yet, I'm having trouble
> synchronizing times with my son to use his Arch linux system to do the
> measurements.
On 02/09/2015 12:28 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
One thing I have noticed is that since switching to this
modem/router/adapter combination my internet download speeds have
decreased significantly under both Linux and Windows, plus I can't play
games under Windows using the ac 5GHz interface, I have
On 02/04/2015 11:10 AM, poma wrote:
Any throughput measurement, any at all? :)
I haven't been able to get any measurements as yet, I'm having trouble
synchronizing times with my son to use his Arch linux system to do the
measurements.
One thing I have noticed is that since switching to this
Any throughput measurement, any at all? :)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.
On 02.02.2015 21:59, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 08:57 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 01.02.2015 21:19, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2015 10:26 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 23:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
>> On 01/30/2015 06:47 AM, p
On 02/02/2015 08:57 AM, poma wrote:
On 01.02.2015 21:19, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 10:26 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 23:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 06:47 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 20:25, poma wrote:
...
Try this
$ gi
On 02.02.2015 20:52, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I issued this command which didn't display much, but the output is
> below. The first line is very interesting.
>
> Couldn't open device, some information will be missing
>bcdUSB 2.10
>bcdDevice0.00
>
USB3 device sh
On 02/02/2015 10:07 AM, poma wrote:
On 01.02.2015 22:57, poma wrote:
On 01.02.2015 21:19, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 10:26 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 23:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 06:47 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 20:2
On 01.02.2015 22:57, poma wrote:
> On 01.02.2015 21:19, Stephen Morris wrote:
>> On 01/30/2015 10:26 AM, poma wrote:
>>> On 29.01.2015 23:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 06:47 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 29.01.2015 20:25, poma wrote:
>>
On 01.02.2015 21:19, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 10:26 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 29.01.2015 23:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 06:47 AM, poma wrote:
> On 29.01.2015 20:25, poma wrote:
>> ...
>>> Try this
>>> $ git
On 01/30/2015 10:26 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 23:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 06:47 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 20:25, poma wrote:
...
Try this
$ git clone https://github.com/vsurrel/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux.git
$ cd rtl8812AU_882
On 29.01.2015 23:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
>> On 01/30/2015 06:47 AM, poma wrote:
>>> On 29.01.2015 20:25, poma wrote:
...
> Try this
> $ git clone https://github.com/vsurrel/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux.git
>
> $ cd rtl8812AU_8821AU_li
On 01/30/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 06:47 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 20:25, poma wrote:
...
Try this
$ git clone https://github.com/vsurrel/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux.git
$ cd rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux/
$ git log -1
commit 7a427372bf5540285d95f090ad5523019a365415
Author: M
On 01/30/2015 06:47 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 20:25, poma wrote:
...
Try this
$ git clone https://github.com/vsurrel/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux.git
$ cd rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux/
$ git log -1
commit 7a427372bf5540285d95f090ad5523019a365415
Author: MilhouseVH
Date: Thu Dec 18 11:42:48 2014 +00
On 29.01.2015 20:25, poma wrote:
> ...
>> Try this
>> $ git clone https://github.com/vsurrel/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux.git
>>
>> $ cd rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux/
>> $ git log -1
>> commit 7a427372bf5540285d95f090ad5523019a365415
>> Author: MilhouseVH
>> Date: Thu Dec 18 11:42:48 2014 +
>>
>> Ad
...
> Try this
> $ git clone https://github.com/vsurrel/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux.git
>
> $ cd rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux/
> $ git log -1
> commit 7a427372bf5540285d95f090ad5523019a365415
> Author: MilhouseVH
> Date: Thu Dec 18 11:42:48 2014 +
>
> Add support for kernel 3.18
>
Also try PLD
On 28.01.2015 21:09, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 01/28/2015 09:09 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 27.01.2015 21:42, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> On 01/28/2015 03:17 AM, poma wrote:
On 25.01.2015 13:46, poma wrote:
> On 25.01.2015 00:05, Stephen Morris wrote:
> ...
>> pci adapter. The only proble
On 01/28/2015 09:09 AM, poma wrote:
On 27.01.2015 21:42, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/28/2015 03:17 AM, poma wrote:
On 25.01.2015 13:46, poma wrote:
On 25.01.2015 00:05, Stephen Morris wrote:
...
pci adapter. The only problem I have now is that it is very hard to get
devices that support Linux
On 27.01.2015 21:21, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 01/27/2015 09:30 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 26.01.2015 21:47, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> On 01/25/2015 11:46 PM, poma wrote:
On 25.01.2015 00:05, Stephen Morris wrote:
...
> pci adapter. The only problem I have now is that it is very hard to g
On 27.01.2015 21:42, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 01/28/2015 03:17 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 25.01.2015 13:46, poma wrote:
>>> On 25.01.2015 00:05, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> ...
pci adapter. The only problem I have now is that it is very hard to get
devices that support Linux from retail stores
On 01/28/2015 03:17 AM, poma wrote:
On 25.01.2015 13:46, poma wrote:
On 25.01.2015 00:05, Stephen Morris wrote:
...
pci adapter. The only problem I have now is that it is very hard to get
devices that support Linux from retail stores.
Help yourself with these two references to search:
http://w
On 01/27/2015 09:30 AM, poma wrote:
On 26.01.2015 21:47, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/25/2015 11:46 PM, poma wrote:
On 25.01.2015 00:05, Stephen Morris wrote:
...
pci adapter. The only problem I have now is that it is very hard to get
devices that support Linux from retail stores.
Help yoursel
On 25.01.2015 13:46, poma wrote:
> On 25.01.2015 00:05, Stephen Morris wrote:
> ...
>> pci adapter. The only problem I have now is that it is very hard to get
>> devices that support Linux from retail stores.
>
> Help yourself with these two references to search:
> http://wireless.kernel.org
> ht
On 26.01.2015 21:47, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 01/25/2015 11:46 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 25.01.2015 00:05, Stephen Morris wrote:
>> ...
>>> pci adapter. The only problem I have now is that it is very hard to get
>>> devices that support Linux from retail stores.
>> Help yourself with these two refere
On 01/25/2015 11:46 PM, poma wrote:
On 25.01.2015 00:05, Stephen Morris wrote:
...
pci adapter. The only problem I have now is that it is very hard to get
devices that support Linux from retail stores.
Help yourself with these two references to search:
http://wireless.kernel.org
https://wikidev
The question mark means that there's a sign-in page (such as in a cafe. )
--
Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse my brevity.Steven Stern wrote:
The wifi is working, but it's switch to a question mark icon: See
http://imgur.com/m1G7n9o
F21
--
On 12/30/2014 11:31 AM, Temlakos wrote:
> On 12/30/2014 12:27 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
>> The wifi is working, but it's switch to a question mark icon: See
>> http://imgur.com/m1G7n9o
>>
>> F21
>>
>
> It sounds as though it is trying to find a hotspot to connect to, and
> can't.
>
> It can't beca
On 12/30/2014 12:27 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
The wifi is working, but it's switch to a question mark icon: See
http://imgur.com/m1G7n9o
F21
It sounds as though it is trying to find a hotspot to connect to, and can't.
It can't because you still have to specify not just the ESSID but also
the
before moving on.. i want to fully understand the issue, why it's
occurring, the cause, etc - not just punting...
thanks
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> I don't use CentOS, but why do you think that the issue will persist with
> Fedora? Fedora has newer kernels so may
I don't use CentOS, but why do you think that the issue will persist with
Fedora? Fedora has newer kernels so may have already addressed this issue.
Perhaps, if you want to try it out, try out one of the LiveCDs first with
Fedora 21, due out tomorrow, and see if the issue still carries over?
Ju
Allegedly, on or about 19 September 2014, jd1008 sent:
> I was indeed eyed suspiciously by other cafe' clientele. They might
> have thought I was trying to hack into their computers. They must not
> be aware that the router isolates the lan clients from each other.
One might presume that a router
On 09/20/2014 03:28 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 20.09.2014, Doug wrote:
>
>> First: Higher power does NOT increase noise in the signal. It just increases
>> the amount of
>> radio frequency energy in the general area, which may be "noise" to some
>> _other_ piece of equipment.
>
> Yes, you are
On 20.09.2014, Doug wrote:
> A better location will probably be somewhere up above all the clutter around
> your work-station.
> Try it up about head-height or higher, on a little bracket or shelf on the
> wall.
This is what I did some time ago and what worked for me.
Btw: I'm using an exter
On 20.09.2014, Doug wrote:
> First: Higher power does NOT increase noise in the signal. It just increases
> the amount of
> radio frequency energy in the general area, which may be "noise" to some
> _other_ piece of equipment.
Yes, you are right. I was imprecise. What I meant is that barely
i
On 09/19/2014 07:24 PM, Doug wrote:
/snip/
***
I'm replying to myself! One other thing has occurred to me: With _any_ external
wi-fi
plug-in, you can remote the plug-in to a better location (which you find by
trial)
On 09/19/2014 05:24 PM, Doug wrote:
On 09/19/2014 07:00 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 09/19/2014 04:50 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/19/2014 02:53 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/19/2014 01:14 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
S
On 09/19/2014 07:00 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 09/19/2014 04:50 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 09/19/2014 02:53 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
>>>
>>> On 09/19/2014 01:14 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
>Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
> So, reaso
On 09/19/2014 04:50 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/19/2014 02:53 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/19/2014 01:14 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
So, reason I am asking is that I would like to increase Tx power to
30dBm
due
On 09/19/2014 02:53 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/19/2014 01:14 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
So, reason I am asking is that I would like to increase Tx power to
30dBm
due to poor connectivity with the hotspot route
On 09/19/2014 02:53 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/19/2014 01:14 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
So, reason I am asking is that I would like to increase Tx power to
30dBm
due to poor connectivity with the hotspot route
On 09/19/2014 01:14 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
So, reason I am asking is that I would like to increase Tx power to 30dBm
due to poor connectivity with the hotspot router.
There are two barriers:
1. the capability of you
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
> Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
> So, reason I am asking is that I would like to increase Tx power to 30dBm
> due to poor connectivity with the hotspot router.
There are two barriers:
1. the capability of your adapter
2. CRDA
For most countries,
On 09/18/2014 09:40 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 19:46 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
I do not have a physical access to the access point.
It is a public hotspot (at a restaurant). My laptop
has no antennas :)
. that might allow you to dangle a better antenna lead through
the chassis. Messy
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 19:46 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> I do not have a physical access to the access point.
> It is a public hotspot (at a restaurant). My laptop
> has no antennas :)
Probably, their system is crap, with nothing you can do about it. It
seems to be par for the course with those things.
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 18:23 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> So, reason I am asking is that I would like to increase Tx power to
> 30dBm due to poor connectivity with the hotspot router.
Something tells me that wouldn't help. WiFi seems to work well with
quite weak signals, so boosting them when your neari
201 - 300 of 488 matches
Mail list logo
